Pope
Francis and Cardinal Fernandez are forcing the traditionalists to interpret
Vatican Council II irrationally and produce a nontraditional conclusion, which
they must accept to avoid being labeled schismatic and then being excommunicated.
Even if they interpret Vatican Council II rationally, in harmony with
Tradition, this will not be acceptable. The issue is not accepting Vatican
Council II in general, but specifically, accepting a Council interpreted only
irrationally. It is obligatory to use the fake premise and inference, to avoid
being excommunicated.
Archbishop
Vigano’s traditional response on the eve of the feast of St. Peter and St.
Paul, was ignored by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith(DDF), Vatican,
since Vatican Council II ( irrational) makes Tradition obsolete. It has
exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the past
ecclesiocentrism. The Archbishop did not speak in terms of Vatican Council II
rational and irrational. This could have been meaningful for the DDF. Now the
DDF will excommunicate traditionalists and conservatives who do not use the
fake premise (invisible people are visible) and fake inference (invisible cases
of LG 16 are visible exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors
etc). They have to intentionally confuse invisible cases of LG 8, 14, 15, 16,
UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, as being visible exceptions for Tradition.
This was never mentioned by Archbishop Vigano.
Now
when the SSPX bishops receive a notice from the DDF to appear for a trial,
since the dialogue with Cardinal Luiz Ladaria has failed, and when they respond
with long arguments from Tradition, the DDF clerics will probably laugh down
their sleeves.
The
Ecclesia Dei Superiors too have still not got it. The issue is Vatican Council II interpreted only irrationally,
which is used to justify all liberalism and a rejection of Tradition.
So
in their defense with Church and secular lawyers, the Franciscans of the
Immaculate ,d the SSPX and Ecclesia Dei communities must target this
particular point: is it ethical for the DDF to re-interpret Vatican Council II
irrationally and then coerce every Catholics to consider this Magisterial?
They
must announce that they accept Vatican Council II rational and demand that Pope
Francis and Cardinal Fernandez do the same. With Vatican Council II (rational) there
is a communion with the popes over the centuries. Since Vatican Council II (rational)
does not contradict the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS etc.
With
Vatican Council II (rational) there has to be heresy and schism irrespective of
who employs it. Now it is the Vatican State which is deceptive for political
and ideological reasons.
But
Vatican Council II, with the NEW DISCOVERY of Vatican Council II rational and
irrational, has become the strong point of the traditionalists and conservative
Catholics. Without the fake premise and inference Pope Francis and Cardinal
Fernandez cannot cite the Council, to justify their liberalism. They need the
false premise to project the Council as a rupture with Tradition. - Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment