Traditionalists have to prepare their defense for schism-trials

 

Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez are forcing the traditionalists to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and produce a nontraditional conclusion, which they must accept to avoid being labeled schismatic and then being excommunicated. Even if they interpret Vatican Council II rationally, in harmony with Tradition, this will not be acceptable. The issue is not accepting Vatican Council II in general, but specifically, accepting a Council interpreted only irrationally. It is obligatory to use the fake premise and inference, to avoid being excommunicated.

Archbishop Vigano’s traditional response on the eve of the feast of St. Peter and St. Paul, was ignored by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith(DDF), Vatican, since Vatican Council II ( irrational) makes Tradition obsolete. It has exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the past ecclesiocentrism. The Archbishop did not speak in terms of Vatican Council II rational and irrational. This could have been meaningful for the DDF. Now the DDF will excommunicate traditionalists and conservatives who do not use the fake premise (invisible people are visible) and fake inference (invisible cases of LG 16 are visible exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors etc). They have to intentionally confuse invisible cases of LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, as being visible exceptions for Tradition. This was never mentioned by Archbishop Vigano.

Now when the SSPX bishops receive a notice from the DDF to appear for a trial, since the dialogue with Cardinal Luiz Ladaria has failed, and when they respond with long arguments from Tradition, the DDF clerics will probably laugh down their sleeves.

The Ecclesia Dei Superiors too have still not got it. The issue is Vatican Council II interpreted only irrationally, which is used to justify all liberalism and a rejection of Tradition.

So in their defense with Church and secular lawyers, the Franciscans of the Immaculate ,d the SSPX and Ecclesia Dei communities must target this particular point: is it ethical for the DDF to re-interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and then coerce every Catholics to consider this Magisterial?

They must announce that they accept Vatican Council II rational and demand that Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez do the same. With Vatican Council II (rational) there is a communion with the popes over the centuries. Since Vatican Council II (rational) does not contradict the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS etc.

With Vatican Council II (rational) there has to be heresy and schism irrespective of who employs it. Now it is the Vatican State which is deceptive for political and ideological reasons.

But Vatican Council II, with the NEW DISCOVERY of Vatican Council II rational and irrational, has become the strong point of the traditionalists and conservative Catholics. Without the fake premise and inference Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez cannot cite the Council, to justify their liberalism. They  need the false premise to project the Council as a rupture with Tradition.     - Lionel Andrades