OCTOBER 22, 2020
Like the website Whispers of Restoration the Voice of the Family mentions the Baltimore Catechism without differentiating between Cushingism and Feeneyism.They also interpret all the Catechisms with Cushingism.So they maintain the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition
Like the website Whispers of Restoration the Voice of the Family mentions the Baltimore Catechism without differentiating between Cushingism and Feeneyism.They also interpret all the Catechisms with Cushingism.So they maintain the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.
For me there is no rupture with the Athanasius Creed. When the Baltimore Catechism mentions the Baptism of Desire it does not contradict the Athanasius Creed. For me EENS ha no objective exceptions . This I call Feeneyism.-Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 3, 2019
Peter Kwasniewski and Whispers of Restoration do not know how to handle it : they violate the Principle of Non Contradiction and are in a swamp
The apologists at the website Whispers of Restoration have not responded to so many posts on this blog and are now thinking of having a paid-employee. They will produce more of the same stuff as the Catholics who interpret magisterial documents with an irrational premise and inference and do not deny it.
So they actually interpret the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation) as a rupture with EENS.They wrongly assume that the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) are objective exceptions to EENS and the Catechism of Pope Pius X.
NEW THEOLOGY OF THE TRADITIONALISTS
AQUINAS CONTRADICTS HIMSELF FOR WR AND KWASNIEWSKI
NO RESTORATION WITH HERESY AND CONFUSION
AUGUST 9, 2018
Traditional Catechisms on Whispers of Restoration support the old exclusivist ecclesiology but the team at the website interpret these catechisms as a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors,EENS and the rest of Traditionhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/traditional-catechisms-on-website.html
THURSDAY, AUGUST 9, 2018
Repost : No Restoration with Cushingism.Not possible : There is not going to be a Restoration with Cushingism.Mattei and Ferrara are part of the problem. So is Whispers of Restoration and 1Peter5
AUGUST 5, 2018
There is not going to be a Restoration with Cushingism.Mattei and Ferrara are part of the problem. So is Whispers of Restoration and 1Peter5
Today's 'traditionalists' are not really traditional especially the Lefebvrist school.Since they are in a rupture with the old ecclesiology of the Church which was Feeneyite and is expressed in the traditional Catechisms available on the website Whispers of Restoration.
FR.CEKADA POLITICALLY CORRECT
I think of Fr. Anthony Cekada who now knows that there are no known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I in the present times and there were none in the past.But he keeps repeating his old line on 'Feeneyism',since it is politically correct.He does not have it in him to apologize and correct himself and others on this issue.
It was the same at the recent Lepanto FoundationConference in Rome when the New Theology was being criticized by the speakers, who in reality use the New Theology, Cushingism, to interpret Vatican Council II, the Catechisms and EENS.Roberto dei Mattei and John Lamont like Fr. Anthony Cekada remain politically correct with the Left.All is well. It is as if they use the LOHO mistake to stay alive.
UR 3 refers to a hypothetical and theoretical cases for us and not someone practically seen in Heaven, saved as a Protestant in his religion.What's so difficult to understand about this?
He will continue to interpret UR 3 as being a non Catholic who has been saved outside the Church and is known personally to him. So of course it becomes a rupture with the dogma EENS.
AUGUST 28, 2024
New Online Library: 1000 Years of Catechisms is flawed. Since it can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism, with the irrational premise or the rational premise and the conclusion is different
There can be two interpretations of the Catechisms.
So in the Catechism of Pope Pius X, 24Q (invincible ignorance) would contradict 27 Q and 29Q (other religions are not paths to salvation, outside the Church there is no salvation), for them- but not for me.
For them 29 Q would be a visible case of someone saved outside the Catholic Church but for me it is an invisible case. They are irrational and I am rational. For them the Catechism contradicts itself but for me there is no contradiction.
Similarly they would accept the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston which indicates that invisible cases of the baptism of desire are visible exceptions for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Similarly Lumen Gentium 16 (invincible ignorance) and Lumen Gentium 14(being saved with the baptism of desire) would be exceptions for the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors for them - but not for me.
Since are premises are different are conclusions are different. For them invisible people are visible and for me they are invisible only.
For them invisible people are visible exceptions for the dogma EENS. For me invisible cases cannot be exceptions for the dogma EENS. 1
- Lionel Andrades
1
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/08/archbishop-carlo-maria-vigano-cannot.html
No comments:
Post a Comment