Vatican Council II became a conspiracy in the Church when Pope Paul VI, Cardinal Ottaviani, Archbishop Lefebvre ,Cardinal Wojtyla and later Cardinal Ratzinger, chose to interpret the Council, with a false premise, as did the Council Fathers.They all could have interpreted the Council without the irrational reasoning of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO). LOHO sought to do away with the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
It seems like a conspiracy through which every one kept silent.Then books were written to support the false narrative on the Council.Who among the authors were writing their books in ignorance, obedience or malice we do not know. There was Fr. Hans Kung, Fr. John Hardon, Mons. Clifford Fenton...but all wrote their books by not seeing hypothetical cases as just being hypothetical.Instead what is implicit was assumed to be explicit at the same time, what was subjective was mistaken to be objective and politically the Left supported this.
Pope Benedict still interprets speculative and hypothetical cases of being saved with the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance as being objective people saved outside the Church. So he interprets LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being practical exceptions to Feeneyite EENS, the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return. He also pusts aside the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed.
He interprets unknown cases as being known and then the conclusion he calls ' a development'.This is an objective and factual mistake and the only development.He intentionally creates what he terms the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.
In 1965 no one corrected Pope Paul VI and told him that there are no exceptions in Vatican Council II to the Syllabus of Errors of Pius IX.
Similarly Lumen Gentium does not contradict Unam Sanctam on outside the Church there is no salvation.
Vatican Council II does not contradict the ecclesiology of St.Robert Bellarmine.
There is nothing in Unitatis Redintigratio to contradict an ecumenism of return.
Nostra Aetate does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.
Vatican Council II does not contradict the ecclesiology of St.Robert Bellarmine.
There is nothing in Unitatis Redintigratio to contradict an ecumenism of return.
Nostra Aetate does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.
So
we have Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and
the dogma EENS saying the Church has an exclusiveness and superiority in
salvation. It has an ecclesiocentric ecclesiology. Like the Magisterium
and missionaries of the 16th century it is saying outside the Church
there is no salvation.This is the Conciliar Church which is not referenced in articles and books on Vatican Council II.
We need to start intepreting Vatican Council II with the red not being an exception to the blue. 1
We need to start intepreting Vatican Council II with the red not being an exception to the blue. 1
-Lionel Andrades
1
7. This missionary activity derives its reason from the will of God, "who wishes all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, Himself a man, Jesus Christ, who gave Himself as a ransom for all" (1 Tim. 2:45), "neither is there salvation in any other" (Acts 4:12). Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it."(17) Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him (Heb. 11:6), yet a necessity lies upon the Church (1 Cor. 9:16), and at the same time a sacred duty, to preach the Gospel. And hence missionary activity today as always retains its power and necessity.-Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II
1
7. This missionary activity derives its reason from the will of God, "who wishes all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, Himself a man, Jesus Christ, who gave Himself as a ransom for all" (1 Tim. 2:45), "neither is there salvation in any other" (Acts 4:12). Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it."(17) Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him (Heb. 11:6), yet a necessity lies upon the Church (1 Cor. 9:16), and at the same time a sacred duty, to preach the Gospel. And hence missionary activity today as always retains its power and necessity.-Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II
TERMS CLARIFIED
BOD(
Baptism of Desire . Case of the unknown cathechumen who desires the
baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is allegedly saved
and now in Heaven)
BOB (Baptism of Blood. The case of unknown person who is in Heaven as a martyr without the baptism of water)
I.I (Invincible
ignorance: The case of an unknown non Catholics who is in Heaven
without faith and baptism and instead in invincible ignorance.)
LG
8 ( Lumen Gentium 8: The case of the unknown person saved outside the
Church with 'elements of sanctification and truth' or where the true
Church of Christ allegedly subsists.
LG 14 (Lumen Gentium 14: Baptism of Desire . Case of the unknown cathechumen who desires the
baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is allegedly saved
and now in Heaven)
LG
16 ( Lumen Gentium 16: The case of the unknown person saved outside the
Church in invincible ignorance and who is now in Heaven without faith
and the baptism of water)
UR
3 (Unitatitis Redintigratiio 3, Vatican Council II : The case of the
unknown Christian, who is saved in his religions without Catholic faith
or the baptism of water in the Catholic Church and is allegedly known to
someone on earth who has seen him or her in Heaven).
NA
2( Nostra Aetate 2: The case of the unknown non Catholic saved outside
the Catholic Church without faith and baptism. He or she is saved with
good and holy things in other religion or with the a ray of that Truth
which enlightens all mankind.
GS
22 (Gaudium et Specs 22. The case of the unknown non Catholic who is
saved outside the Catholic Church. He or she is saved without faith and
baptism but with goodwill.
November 1, 2019
Pope Benedict needs to admit that there is a fundamental mistake in Vatican Council II and he was part of it, he contributed to it at Vatican Council II and in the years that followed.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/pope-benedict-needs-to-admit-that-there.html
NOVEMBER 1, 2019
Pope Benedict should apologize before he dies. He needs to admit that he made a mistake. He wrongly assumed BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8 etc were exceptions to EENS. Then upon this irrationality he created a New Theology, New Ecumenism, New Ecclesiology and New Evangelisation and changed Canon Law to support the error.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/pope-benedict-should-apologize-before.html
NOVEMBER 1, 2019
Pope Francis follows Pope Benedict's error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. He needs to correct it. They both need to apologize for the mistake.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/pope-francis-follows-pope-benedicts.html
OCTOBER 31, 2019
There are no arguements to support exceptions to EENS. There cannot be any objective exception, whatever is the argument
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/there-are-no-exceptions-to-support.html
Michael
Sean Winters affirms Vatican Council II and also the strict
interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) since the Council
supports Feeneyite EENS when it is interpreted rationally.The Council is
Feeneyite.He agrees with me.When he supports Fr. Leonard Feeney on EENS
he is not in schism since the Council does the same when interpreted
rationally. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/michael-sean-winters-affirms-vatican.html
OCTOBER 31, 2019
A Catholic can interpret Vatican Council in harmony with the past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and the Syllabus of Errors or/and he can also reject the Council since it has an objective error, which cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.The error the periti made was to assume there were exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and then they placed 'the exceptions' in the text of the Council.
So Massimo Faggioli can no more interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition(EENS, Syllabusof Errors, Athanasius Creed etc).
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/so-massimo-faggioli-can-no-more.html
NOVEMBER 4, 2019
Michael Sean Winters affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) since if asked he would say that the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) and LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to invisible and not visible people in 2019. So they are not practical exceptions to the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. I have sent him e-mails of these posts and there is no contradiction from him.
NOVEMBER 3, 2019
Michael
Sean Winters affirms Vatican Council II and also the strict
interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) since the Council
supports Feeneyite EENS when it is interpreted rationally.The Council is
Feeneyite.He agrees with me.When he supports Fr. Leonard Feeney on EENS
he is not in schism since the Council does the same when interpreted
rationally. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/michael-sean-winters-affirms-vatican.html
SEPTEMBER 2, 2019
AUGUST 24, 2019
Masimo Faggioli, Michael Sean Winters interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and justify so many changes in the Church
AUGUST 22, 2019
Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and so do not correct the error made by Pope Paul VI. They also interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and so do not correct the error made by Pope John XXIII https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/massimo-faggioli-and-michael-sean.html
AUGUST 22, 2019
Massimo Faggioli, Michael Sean Winters and the other Cushingites support heresy when they reject the Athanasius Creed , change the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, change the interpretation of Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms and reject traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS ) based upon rational Feeneyism.They are in a general rupture with the past Magisterium, when they use Cushingism as a philosophy and theology
JANUARY 26, 2018
Hilary White and Massimo Faggioli interpret the Catechism, Vatican Council II and Letter of the Holy Office with hypothetical cases not being hypothetical : so there is a rupture with Tradition (with graphics)
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/01/hilary-white-and-massimo-faggioli.html
November 12, 2019
At Oxford University 50 years after Vatican Council II they still do not have an insight into their collective error.Students at Oxford, thousands of them, did not think correctly and were going along with the masses, in their error. This centre of learning was in ignorance.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/at-oxford-university-england-professors.html
November 11, 2019
The Oxford University Press has produced many books on Vatican Council II based upon a false premise. A deceptive rupture is created with Catholic Tradition
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-oxford-university-press-has.html
OCTOBER 29, 2019
Such
a staggering thought.All those thousands of books, numerous, written on
Vatican Council II have a major theological error. They should be
thrown into the dustbin- O'Malley, Kasper, Faggioli,Gherardini,Mattei,
Ferrara.They violate Newton's laws of physics and Aristotle's Principle
of Non Contradiction.
OCTOBER 29, 2019
The 16 books of Vatican Council II have an error. They violate the Principle of Non Contradiction. The Council Fathers misunderstood the laws of physics. They wrongly assumed the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) referred to physical bodies in time and space. They they created a new false theology based upon this irrationality. This cannot be magisterial but is human error. Since the Holy Spirit cannot make a factual and objective error.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-16-books-of-vatican-council-ii-have.html
No comments:
Post a Comment