So if LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in
Vatican Council II are not exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
and the rest f Tradition, as you say, then why did the Council Fathers (1965)
mention them?
Lionel: They made a mistake. They repeated the error in the 1949 Letter
of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney. It
wrongly projected invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in
invincible ignorance as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS, or EENS
according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), which did not mention any
exceptions. - Lionel Andrades
OCTOBER 30, 2016
With Feeneyite Vatican Council II the Catholic Church affirms the Social Reign of Christ the King. http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/with-feeneyite-vatican-council-ii.html
________________________
Questions and Answers
___________________________
FROM THE RIGHT HAND BARD/CLICK TO ACCESS
Questions and Answers : Vatican Council II is Feeneyite. It has an exclusivist ecclesiologyhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-vatican-council.html
Questions and Answers : Evangelizing with Vatican Council IIhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-evangelising-with.html
Questions and Answers : Vatican Council II affirms the Social Kingship of Christ the Kinghttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-vatican-council_7.html
Questions and Answers : Did the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 make a factual mistake ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-did-letter-of.html
________________________________
Questions and Answers : Vatican Council II affirms the Social Kingship of Christ the King
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-vatican-council_7.html
Questions and Answers : Evangelizing with Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-evangelising-with.html
Questions and Answers : Vatican Council II is Feeneyite. It has an exclusivist ecclesiology
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-vatican-council.html_________________________
The present 'Magisterium' supports the political Left on doctrine and has also made a factual mistake
If ' a ray of the Truth' (NA 2) is considered visible or invisible decides heresy
The Holy Office 1949 made a mistake. Cardinal Marchetti-Selvaggiani assumed there are known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus - Cantarella, CathInfo forum http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/08/the-holy-office-1949-made-mistake.html Magisterium: it all depends on how you look at It!
Archbishop Gerhard Muller was using the false premise : here is the proof! http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/06/archbishop-gerhard-muller-was-using.html#links
'This is the teaching of the Church'http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/07/this-is-teaching-of-church.html
_____________________________________
The Roman Rota and members of Canonists and theological associations in Italy interpret Vatican Council II by confusing invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as referring to visible non Catholics saved outside the Church. Even judges of the secular courts in Italy, have had a religious formation at pontifical universities.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/fr.html
The judiciary in Italy use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II like Abp. Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/the-judiciary-in-italy-use-false.htmlThis is a political issue in Italy, which Salvini and Meloni must bring up before their political opponents, their political parties, the judiciary, ecclesiastics and Italians in general
La Sapienza University Rome has a Faculty of Law(Jurisprudenza) which interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise
Catholics are discriminated in Rome because of their religion : seventeen years in Rome and I am still waiting to be a priest.
Directors of Periodica de re canonica,the journal of the Faculty of Canon Law of the Pontifical Gregorian University interpret Vatican Council II irrationally : so they would discriminate against conservative students
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/directors-of-periodica-de-re.htmlCanonists and speakers at the Archisodalitium, Curiae Romanae conferences overlook deception in the interpretation of Magisterial documents
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/canonists-and-speakers-at.html
To reject a conservative Catholic student, who affirms EENS, Vatican Council II, all the Catechisms and the Syllabus of Errors is unfair. It is unfair to tell him that Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally, contradicts Tradition
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/to-reject-conservative-catholic-student.html
Irrationality would also be part of the religious formation of Catholic members of the judiciary in Italy
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/irrationality-would-also-be-part-of.html
At the Angelicum and Gregorian University,Rome, they approve a doctoral thesis only of students who interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.This is unethical and dishonest
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/at-angelicum-and-gregorian.html
There is a formation course at the University of St.Thomas Aquinas, on the new ecumenism, titled Ut Unum Sint which interprets Unitatis Reintigratio in Vatican Council II has having exceptions to the traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/there-is-formation-course-at-university.html
Correspondents of the National Catholic Reporter, Crux,the Tablet, Commonweal, Catholic Herald, U.K,National Catholic Register and EWTN interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/correspondents-of-national-catholic.html
Cardinal Ratzinger's theology is the cause of the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.The interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church is heretical and it is now common throughout the Church. He did not correct Pope Paul VI when he interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism.Instead he produced Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus, based upon the irrational philosophy and theology and then projected it as the Deposit of the Faith
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/cardinal-ratzingers-theology-is-cause.html OCTOBER 1, 2018
Polish Government must not use Pope Benedict's writings as a reference : does not affirm Social Reign of Christ the King and non separation of Church and State, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.or Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) which is the basis for the past ecclesiology of the Churchhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/polish-government-must-use-pope.html
Vatican Council II can be interpreted without the error and this could be the official interpretation of the Council by the CDFhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/vatican-council-ii-can-be-interpreted.html
When the Catholic Church in Hungary and Poland affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) then the Church's doctrine and theology would be the same as during the time of the Austro-Hungarian Empirehttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/when-they-catholic-church-in-hungary.html
Thought police to control Catholic catechesis from Sept.23 in the parisheshttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/thought-police-to-control-catholic.html
_________________________________________________
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/they-have-choice-in-hungary-and-prime.html
No comments:
Post a Comment