The correspondents of the National Catholic Reporter, Crux,the Tablet, Commonweal, Catholic Herald, U.K,National Catholic Register and EWTN interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.
They do not choose the rational interpretation of the Council which supports Tradition( EENS, Syllbus of Errors of pope Pius IX, Athanasius Creed etc).
For them there are visible exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). They include the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) .These are practical exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.They would have to be visible and seen for them to be exceptions. Since invisible cases cannot be exceptions to EENS.
And there have to be exceptions to EENS.
Since if they say that BOD, BOB and I.I are invisible then they would be affirming the past ecclesiology. There would be no practical exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. There would be no literal exceptions to an ecumenism of return.It would be saying that there is no known salvation outside the Catholic Church. It would be saying that when we meet a non Catholic we know he is oriented to Hell. Since the norm for salvation is faith and baptism(AG 7) and we cannot judge any one to be an exception. An exception could only be known to God.
They would be rejecting the New Ecumenism, New Theology and New Ecclesiology.This is not allowed. They have to say that there are exceptions to EENS or the Left will object.1
-Lionel Andrades
1
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment