Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Archbishops Guido Pozzo and Augustine di Noia are schismatic but I am not since I affirm all magisterial documents but interpret them with Feeneyism.So there is no rupture with the past popes.They instead affirm all magisterial documents but interpret them with Cushingism.So they emerge schismatic.
There is no malafide intention on their part I assume, but when they, or any one else, especially the traditionalists, use the false premise, they create a rupture with Tradition.
They do this with Vatican Council II and the Council becomes a break with the strict interpretation of the dogma extrra ecclesiam nulla salus.It is a rupture with what the lady journalist from the Associated Press last Thursday at the Press Conference on Placuit Deo referred to, as the Catholic Church's having the superiority and exclusiveness in salvation. But not for me. I affirm EENS along with Vatican Council II(Feeneyite). I affirm EENS along with the Syllabus of Errors. I affirm EENS along with only an ecumenism of return.I affirm the past exlusivist ecclesiology of the Church with invisible for us and visible only for God, baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance.
At the Press Conference on Placuito Deo Cardinal Ladaria could have affirmed EENS and Vatican Council II like me but he chose not to.
In March 2016 Pope Benedict could have affirmed EENS and Vatican Council II like me but he chose not to.
The traditionalists can affirm Vatican Council II and EENS like me but they probably do not know about it.They are still confused by the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
Schismatic Cardinal Luiz Ladaria's rejection of exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church last Thursday at the Press Conference on Placiut Deo comes from the Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston (1949). He assumed Lumen Gentium 8 ( elements of sanctification and truth/ subsist it) refers to known people saved outside the Catholic Church.Hypothetical cases were assumed to be non-hypotethical. This was the false reasoning in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.It can be seen with these graphics.
Here is the proof. It can be seen with the following three examples.Cardinal Ladaria , when he was Father Luiz Ladaria s.j, interpreted invisible and unknown cases as being known and visible exceptoins to the exclusivist e ecclesiocentrism of the past.His dark footprints can be seen in the International Theological Commission' s papers, Christianity and the World Religions(1997), andThe Hope of Salvation for Infants Who Die Without Being Baptised,Internaional Theological Commission(2007).
1.
10. Exclusivist ecclesiocentrism—the fruit of a specific theological system or of a mistaken understanding of the phrase extra ecclesiam nulla salus—is no longer defended by Catholic theologians after the clear statements of Pius XII and Vatican Council II on the possibility of salvation for those who do not belong visibly to the Church (cf, e.g., LG 16; GS 22).-International Theological Commission, Christianity and the World Religions 1997. President : Father Luiz Ladaria s.j
41. The semina verbi, "seeds of the word", can be found outside the limits of the visible Church and specifically in the different religions; this motif is frequently combined with that of the light which enlightens all men and with that of the preparation for the Gospel (AG 11, 15; LG 16, 17; NA 2; Redemptoris missio, 56).-Christianity and the World Religions, International Theological Commission.
MARCH 26, 2012
INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION ASSUMES ‘SEEDS OF THE WORD’ (VATICAN COUNCIL II ) IN OTHER RELIGIONS ARE KNOWN TO US AND THIS IS AN EXPLICIT EXCEPTION TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
59. The Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston (1949) offers further specifications. “To gain eternal salvation, it is not always required that a person be incorporated in reality (reapse) as a member of the Church, but it is necessary that one belong to it at least in desire and longing (voto et desiderio). It is not always necessary that this desire be explicit as it is with catechumens.-The Hope of Salvation for Infants Who Die Without Being Baptised,Internaional Theological Commission(2007)
Schismatic Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j does not have the faith: We need to ask the CDF and the Conferences of Catholic Bishops to interpret magisterial documents rationally.Then there is no schism with the past popes
Schismatic Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j does not have the faith.He has accepted the schismatic Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which infers that unknown people are known exceptions to the traditional teaching, on the Catholic Church having the superiority in salvation.1
He then interprets Vatican Council II with hypothetical references being non hypothetical.He uses the invisible people are visible premise. 2 If he avoided this error Vatican Council II would not be a rupture with the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors.
So at the Press Conference on Placuit Deo, last Thursday, in response to the question by a lady journalist from the Associated Press, he projected Lumen Gentium 8 as an exception to the traditional teaching on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.There was no superiority of the Catholic Church in salvation for him.
Unlike me he interprets the Catechism of the Catholic Church as a rupture with the dogma EENS and the old ecclesiology of the Church. He does this by assuming references to invisible people are not visible. They are examples of salvation outside the Church,for Cardinal Ladaria, even though no one knows them in real life.3
This is how Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger also reasons. It is expressed in the theological papers of the International Theological Commission and also in Redemptoris Missio and Dominus.
We need to ask the CDF and the Conferences of Catholic Bishops to interpret magisterial documents rationally.Then there is no schism with the past popes.
We need to ask all Catholic religious communities to do the same.
-Lionel Andrades
1
_________________________________
2.
___________________________________
3.
_____________________________________
MARCH 6, 2018
Cardinal Ladaria does not have any theological basis to reject the teaching on the superiority of the Catholic Church in salvation.Lumen Gentium 8 is not an exception to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.
If Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j had used the For and Neutral to EENS approach Lumen Gentium 8 would not be a rupture with the old teaching on the superiority and exclusiveness of salvation in the Catholic Church
Hilary White and Massimo Faggioli interpret the Catechism, Vatican Council II and Letter of the Holy Office with hypothetical cases not being hypothetical : so there is a rupture with Tradition (with graphics)
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j does not have the faith.He does not have the Catholic Faith.He does not support the superiority of the Catholic Church in salvation.
One cannot simply reject a de fide teaching of the Church, which is obligatory for all Catholics to believe in.
There has to be a theological basis to suggest that there is a change.
He does not have any theological basis.
Lumen Gentium 8 is not an exception to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.
Cardinal Ladaria does not have any theological basis to reject the teaching on the superiority of the Catholic Church in salvation.
Pope John Paul II inspite of his poor health, and a schismatic Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, went to New Delhi,India and announced for all that they needed to accept Jesus in the Catholic Church for salvation.He read from Ecclesia di Eucarestia there, since the Chinese did not allow him to enter their territory.
The schismatic European bishop in New Delhi, to appease the locals said that the pope was calling all to personal conversion and not conversion into the Church. He soon died tragically in Bosnia.
I interpret Lumen Gentium 8 as being a hypothetical case. It can only be a hypothetical case for us human beings. It cannot be a known person, someone visible in the flesh.Since if someone known was saved outside the Church, with 'elements of sanctification and truth' it would only be known to God.The person would be in Heaven and not on earth.This is common sense. It is something obvious.
So the ordinary way of salvation is still 'faith and baptism' in the Catholic Church.
It means most people are oriented to Hell since they die without 'faith and baptism'.In Heaven there are only Catholics and they are there with Catholic faith and the baptism of water.Children are in limbo.
So when I meet a non Catholic, I know he is oriented to Hell since the Church guided by the Holy Spirit teaches this ( Ad Gentes 7,Catechism of the Catholic Church 845,846,1257, Dominus Iesus 20,Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441,Athanasius Creed etc).
When I say that all non Catholics are oriented to Hell it is based on the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.This traditional ecclesiology only supports an ecumenism of return.Lumen Gentium 8, Lumen Gentium 16 etc are not exceptions to the old teaching on the superiority of the Catholic Church for salvation.
Schismatics Cardinal Ladaria, Archbishop Augustine di Noia and Archbishop Guido Pozzo cannot say that they know someone, outside the Church( Protestant, Pentecostal etc) who will not be going to Hell.Personally, they cannot judge that someone will be an exception to the ordinary means of salvation, which is faith and baptism in the Catholic Church.
The ordinary means of salvation is notthe baptism of desire, baptism of blood, invincible ignorance or elements of sanctification and truth.
Cardinal Ladaria had lost the faith last Thursday during the Press Conference on Placuito Deo when the lady journalist from Associated Press asked him a question.He gave a heretical reply.He misinterpreted Lumen Gentium 8 to create a schism with the past popes. He wrongly interpreted LG 8 to reject the dogma EENS, interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS, make the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) a break with the past and to make the past Catechisms a rupture with EENS.
He has changed our understanding of doctrines in the Nicene Creed and has put aside dogmatic teachings of the popes including that on the infallibility of the pope ex cathedra, in this case, in the interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.-Lionel Andrades
MARCH 5, 2018
The Catholic Church still teaches it only has exclusive salvation .This is there in the text of magisterial documents interpreted with the for and neutral to EENS method
Card.Ladaria s.j, must ask the German Bishops Conference to interpret Vatican Council II with the for and neutral to EENS method..Their present for and against EENS method is irrational, non traditional,heretical and schismatic
No one is appealing to Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,Vatican to ask the Catholic Bishops Conferences to interpret Vatican Council II with the for and neutral to EENS method instead of the present for and against EENS method.
If Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j had used the For and Neutral to EENS approach Lumen Gentium 8 would not be a rupture with the old teaching on the superiority and exclusiveness of salvation in the Catholic Church
Press Conference – Presentation of « Placuit Deo » to Catholic Bishops 2018-03-01
____________________________________
FEBRUARY 15, 2018
The baptism of blood could never be an exception to EENS. Since it is known only to God and is a hypothetical case for us. It cannot be seen in the present times to be an exception.