Friday, May 31, 2024
There is no denial from any of the Rome Vicariate offices under the new Vicar General too.
There is no denial from any of the Rome Vicariate offices under the new Vicar General too. Cardinal Mauro Gambetti ofm conv., agrees that hypothetical cases of LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II do not contradict Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney made an objective mistake. It confused invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as being visible exceptions for EENS. So EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) was made obsolete.
“Outside the Church there is no salvation” (extra ecclesiam nulla salus) is a doctrine of the Catholic Faith that was taught By Jesus Christ to His Apostles, preached by the Fathers, defined by popes and councils and piously believed by the faithful in every age of the Church. Here is how the Popes defined it:
- “There is but one universal Church of the faithful, outside which no one at all is saved.” (Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, 1215.)
- “We declare, say, define, and pronounce that it is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff.” (Pope Boniface VIII, the Bull Unam Sanctam, 1302.)
- “The most Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics, can have a share in life eternal; but that they will go into the eternal fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless before death they are joined with Her; and that so important is the unity of this ecclesiastical body that only those remaining within this unity can profit by the sacraments of the Church unto salvation, and they alone can receive an eternal recompense for their fasts, their almsgivings, their other works of Christian piety and the duties of a Christian soldier. No one, let his almsgiving be as great as it may, no one, even if he pour out his blood for the Name of Christ, can be saved, unless he remain within the bosom and the unity of the Catholic Church.” (Pope Eugene IV, the Bull Cantate Domino, 1441.)https://catholicism.org/outside-the-church-there-is-no-salvation
The Dominicans and Franciscans held the strict interpretation of EENS which today is not contradicted by Vatican Council II (rational/Feeneyite) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (rational/Feeneyite). So are back to traditional faith and morals.
NEW MORAL THEOLOGY OBSOLETE
The new mortal theology and new
concept of mission and evangelization is based upon Vatican Council II (irrational/Cushingite).
There is no denial from the Vicar General of the offices of the Auxiliary
bishops. Neither has there been any denial over the year from Fr. Paulo Boumis,
the Parish Priest of Sant Agapito, Prenistina, Rome.
-Lionel Andrades
MAY 30, 2024
Whether they like it or not, the Vicar General and Auxiliary Bishops of Rome support me, when they interpret LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, rationally
MAY 20, 2024
Definition : fake premise, inference and conclusion and the rational premise, inference and conclusion.
The common fake premise is – invisible people are physically visible in 2024.
The common fake inference is – there are physically visible non Catholics in 2024 saved outside the Catholic Church without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
So the conclusion; the expected false conclusion is that Vatican Council II is a rupture with the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church. This is a New Theology in the Church. It says outside the Church there is known salvation.
All this reasoning I call Cushingism. This process of bad reasoning is common among the Cushingite popes, cardinals and bishops.
The rational premise is – invisible people are invisible in 2024. Lumen Gentium 16 etc refer to hypothetical cases only.
The rational inference is – there are no physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church in 2024 without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
The traditional and rational conclusion is that Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. There are no objective exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence (1441), the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q,27Q ) and the rest of Tradition.We are back to the old theology of the Roman Missal.
I call this reasoning Feeneyism.
Feeneyism and Cushingism, for me, refer to a way of thinking and not the two well known persons, Cardinal Richard Cushing and Fr. Leonard Feeney.
I interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance with Feeneyism. Cardinal Richard Cushing and the popes from Pius XII interpreted them with Cushingism.
I interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism ( invisible cases of Lumen Gentium 16 etc are invisible in 2024). Pope Paul VI and the popes who followed used Cushingism ( invisible cases of Lumen Gentium 14 are physically visible in 1965-2024).
In the 1920s and 1930's the Catholic Church was Feeneyite. Today it is Cushingite.
-Lionel Andrades
Mary, Mother of the Church
Thursday, May 30, 2024
Whether they like it or not, the Vicar General and Auxiliary Bishops of Rome support me, when they interpret LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, rationally
MAY 29, 2024
Whether they like it or not, the Vicar General and Auxiliary Bishops of Rome support me, when they interpret LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, rationally
Whether they like it or not, the Vicar General and Auxiliary Bishops of Rome support me, when they interpret LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, rationally i.e LG 8 etc are invisible cases in 2024. We cannot meet or see someone saved outside the Church in invincible ignorance (LG 16) etc. So our conclusion is the same. Since our premise is the same ( invisible people are invisible). The Rome Vicariate becomes traditional. They lose their familiar liberalism.
-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.
GAMBETTI Card. Mauro, O.F.M. Conv.
Cardinal Mauro Gambetti, O.F.M. Conv., Archpriest of St. Peter’s Basilica, Vicar General of His Holiness for Vatican City and President of the Fabric of Saint Peter’s, was born on 27 October 1965 in Castel San Pietro Terme, Bologna. After graduating with a degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Bologna, he entered the Order of Friars Minor Conventual. After a year of novitiate, he professed his temporary vows on 29 August 1995, and his perpetual vows on 20 September 1998. Receiving his bachelor’s degree in theology from the Theological Institute of Assisi, Perugia, he subsequently earned a licentiate in theological anthropology from the Theological Faculty of Central Italy in Florence.
He was ordained a priest on 8 January in Longiano, Forlì-Cesena, where in the Convent of the Santissimo Crocifisso he headed the office of youth ministry and vocational pastoral care for the region of Emilia-Romagna and, from 2005 to 2009, also that of Guardian of the Franciscan community.
In spring 2009 his confreres in the Bologna province of Saint Anthony of Padua, with jurisdiction over the convents of the Friars Minor Conventual of Emilia-Romagna, elected him their Provincial Minister, an office he held until 22 February 2013. At that time, he was called to assume the role of Custos General of the General Custody of the Sacred Convent of Saint Francis in Assisi for the four-year period 2013-2017. At the same time, the Bishop of Assisi-Nocera Umbra-Gualdo Tadino appointed him as Episcopal Vicar for the pastoral care of the Papal Basilica of Saint Francis and the other places of worship entrusted to the Friars Minor Conventual of the same Diocese.
He was elected President of the Intermediterranean Federation of Provincial Ministers of the Friars Minor Conventual in September 2017.
In 2017 he was reconfirmed as Custos General of the Sacred Convent of Saint Francis of Assisi for the four-year term 2017-2021, a role he held until 31 October 2020.
He received episcopal consecrated on 22 November 2020 in the Basilica of St Francis in Assisi, becoming titular Archbishop of Thisiduo on 30 October 2020.
On 20 February 2021 Holy Father named him Archpriest of St. Peter’s Basilica, Vicar General of His Holiness for Vatican City State and President of the Fabric of Saint Peter’s.
On 2 June 2023 the Holy Father has appointed the Cardinal Gambetti judge of the Vatican City State Supreme Court, with effect from 1 January 2024.
Created and proclaimed Cardinal by Pope Francis in the consistory of 28 November 2020, of the Deaconry of Santissimo Nome di Maria al Foro Traiano.
Member of:
· Dicasteries: for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life; for Communication;
· Pontifical Commission for the Vatican City State.
__________________________________________
MAY 20, 2024
Definition : fake premise, inference and conclusion and the rational premise, inference and conclusion.
The common fake premise is – invisible people are physically visible in 2024.
The common fake inference is – there are physically visible non Catholics in 2024 saved outside the Catholic Church without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
So the conclusion; the expected false conclusion is that Vatican Council II is a rupture with the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church. This is a New Theology in the Church. It says outside the Church there is known salvation.
All this reasoning I call Cushingism. This process of bad reasoning is common among the Cushingite popes, cardinals and bishops.
The rational premise is – invisible people are invisible in 2024. Lumen Gentium 16 etc refer to hypothetical cases only.
The rational inference is – there are no physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church in 2024 without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
The traditional and rational conclusion is that Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. There are no objective exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence (1441), the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q,27Q ) and the rest of Tradition.We are back to the old theology of the Roman Missal.
I call this reasoning Feeneyism.
Feeneyism and Cushingism, for me, refer to a way of thinking and not the two well known persons, Cardinal Richard Cushing and Fr. Leonard Feeney.
I interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance with Feeneyism. Cardinal Richard Cushing and the popes from Pius XII interpreted them with Cushingism.
I interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism ( invisible cases of Lumen Gentium 16 etc are invisible in 2024). Pope Paul VI and the popes who followed used Cushingism ( invisible cases of Lumen Gentium 14 are physically visible in 1965-2024).
In the 1920s and 1930's the Catholic Church was Feeneyite. Today it is Cushingite.
-Lionel Andrades
Mary, Mother of the Church
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/05/at-chartres-pilgrim-like-all-members-of.html
____________________________
MAY 23, 2024
How can the Vatican legally interpret Vatican Council II ( LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc) with Cushingism and not Feeneyism ?
How can the Vatican legally interpret Vatican Council II ( LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc) with Cushingism and not Feeneyism ? How is this allowed ? How can the FSCIRE and Cardinal Zuppi in Bologna do the same? - Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/05/how-can-vatican-legally-interpret.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/05/may-29-2024-am-i-opposing-magisterium-no.html
Cardinal Mauro Gambetti O.F.M Conv., the new Vicar General like Cardinal Angelo Donatis the former Vicar General of Rome support me when they interpret Vatican Council II rationally i.e LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to physically invisible cases in 2024
MAY 29, 2024
Am I opposing the Magisterium ? No. I am affirming Magisterial Documents right up to the Catechism of the Catholic Church. I interpret them rationally and so my conclusion is traditional. The Magisterium does not change.
Am I opposing the Magisterium ? No. I am affirming Magisterial Documents right up to the Catechism of the Catholic Church. I interpret them rationally and so my conclusion is traditional. The Magisterium does not change. The liberalism of the popes from Paul VI to Francis comes when the irrational interpretation of Magisterial Documents (Creeds, Catechisms etc), especially that of Vatican Council II.
-Lionel Andrades
MAY 29, 2024
The perennial Magisterium of the Catholic Church has not changed. All we have to do is interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc, as being hypothetical cases. We then return to the apostolic ecclesiology of the Church. This was the understanding of the Church Fathers.
The perennial Magisterium of the Catholic Church has not changed. All we have to do is interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc, as being hypothetical cases. We then return to the apostolic ecclesiology of the Church. This was the understanding of the Church Fathers.
We go back to the ecclesiology of the old Roman Missal simply by interpreting LG 8 etc rationally. This is not just my opinion. Anyone can test it out.- Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.
MAY 29, 2024
Whether they like it or not, the Vicar General and Auxiliary Bishops of Rome support me, when they interpret LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, rationally
Whether they like it or not, the Vicar General and Auxiliary Bishops of Rome support me, when they interpret LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, rationally i.e LG 8 etc are invisible cases in 2024. We cannot meet or see someone saved outside the Church in invincible ignorance (LG 16) etc. So our conclusion is the same. Since our premise is the same ( invisible people are invisible). The Rome Vicariate becomes traditional. They lose their familiar liberalism.
-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.
GAMBETTI
Card. Mauro, O.F.M. Conv.
Cardinal
Mauro Gambetti, O.F.M. Conv., Archpriest of St. Peter’s Basilica, Vicar
General of His Holiness for Vatican City and President of the
Fabric of Saint Peter’s, was born on 27 October 1965 in Castel San Pietro
Terme, Bologna. After graduating with a degree in mechanical engineering
from the University of Bologna, he entered the Order of Friars Minor
Conventual. After a year of novitiate, he professed his temporary vows on
29 August 1995, and his perpetual vows on 20 September 1998. Receiving
his bachelor’s degree in theology from the Theological Institute of Assisi,
Perugia, he subsequently earned a licentiate in theological anthropology from
the Theological Faculty of Central Italy in Florence.
He was
ordained a priest on 8 January in Longiano, Forlì-Cesena, where in the Convent
of the Santissimo Crocifisso he headed the office of youth ministry and
vocational pastoral care for the region of Emilia-Romagna and, from 2005 to
2009, also that of Guardian of the Franciscan community.
In spring
2009 his confreres in the Bologna province of Saint Anthony of Padua, with
jurisdiction over the convents of the Friars Minor Conventual of
Emilia-Romagna, elected him their Provincial Minister, an office he held until
22 February 2013. At that time, he was called to assume the role of
Custos General of the General Custody of the Sacred Convent of Saint Francis in
Assisi for the four-year period 2013-2017. At the same time, the Bishop
of Assisi-Nocera Umbra-Gualdo Tadino appointed him as Episcopal Vicar for the
pastoral care of the Papal Basilica of Saint Francis and the other places of
worship entrusted to the Friars Minor Conventual of the same Diocese.
He was
elected President of the Intermediterranean Federation of Provincial Ministers
of the Friars Minor Conventual in September 2017.
In 2017 he
was reconfirmed as Custos General of the Sacred Convent of Saint Francis of
Assisi for the four-year term 2017-2021, a role he held until 31 October 2020.
He received
episcopal consecrated on 22 November 2020 in the Basilica of St
Francis in Assisi, becoming titular Archbishop of Thisiduo on 30
October 2020.
On 20
February 2021 Holy Father named him Archpriest of St. Peter’s Basilica, Vicar
General of His Holiness for Vatican City State and President of the Fabric of
Saint Peter’s.
On 2 June
2023 the Holy Father has appointed the Cardinal Gambetti judge of the Vatican
City State Supreme Court, with effect from 1 January 2024.
Created and
proclaimed Cardinal by Pope Francis in the consistory of 28 November 2020, of
the Deaconry of Santissimo Nome di Maria al Foro Traiano.
Member of:
· Dicasteries: for Institutes of Consecrated Life and
Societies of Apostolic Life; for Communication;
· Pontifical Commission for the Vatican City State.
__________________________________________
MAY 20, 2024
Definition : fake premise, inference and conclusion and the rational premise, inference and conclusion.
The common fake premise is – invisible people are physically visible in 2024.
The common fake inference is – there are physically visible non Catholics in 2024 saved outside the Catholic Church without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
So the conclusion; the expected false conclusion is that Vatican Council II is a rupture with the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church. This is a New Theology in the Church. It says outside the Church there is known salvation.
All this reasoning I call Cushingism. This process of bad reasoning is common among the Cushingite popes, cardinals and bishops.
The rational premise is – invisible people are invisible in 2024. Lumen Gentium 16 etc refer to hypothetical cases only.
The rational inference is – there are no physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church in 2024 without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
The traditional and rational conclusion is that Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. There are no objective exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence (1441), the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q,27Q ) and the rest of Tradition.We are back to the old theology of the Roman Missal.
I call this reasoning Feeneyism.
Feeneyism and Cushingism, for me, refer to a way of thinking and not the two well known persons, Cardinal Richard Cushing and Fr. Leonard Feeney.
I interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance with Feeneyism. Cardinal Richard Cushing and the popes from Pius XII interpreted them with Cushingism.
I interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism ( invisible cases of Lumen Gentium 16 etc are invisible in 2024). Pope Paul VI and the popes who followed used Cushingism ( invisible cases of Lumen Gentium 14 are physically visible in 1965-2024).
In the 1920s and 1930's the Catholic Church was Feeneyite. Today it is Cushingite.
-Lionel Andrades
Mary, Mother of the Church
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/05/at-chartres-pilgrim-like-all-members-of.html
____________________________
MAY 23, 2024
How can the Vatican legally interpret Vatican Council II ( LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc) with Cushingism and not Feeneyism ?
How can the Vatican legally interpret Vatican Council II ( LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc) with Cushingism and not Feeneyism ? How is this allowed ? How can the FSCIRE and Cardinal Zuppi in Bologna do the same? - Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/05/how-can-vatican-legally-interpret.html
Posts
