Thursday, December 5, 2019
Cardinal Ratzinger's theology is the cause of the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.The interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church is heretical and it is now common throughout the Church. He did not correct Pope Paul VI when he interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism.Instead he produced Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus, based upon the irrational philosophy and theology and then projected it as the Deposit of the Faith
BLOGS | DEC. 3, 2019
German Bishop Urges Diocese Not to Be Intimidated as Synodal Path Begins
Evangelization and unity must be the priority, Bishop Rudolf Voderholzer of Regensburg advised his flock, and ‘under no circumstances’ should the synodal process be ‘political or sociological.’
Lionel: Evangelisation based on a rational interpretation of Vatican Council II must be the priority. It is also important for unity.We cannot have Catholics interpreting the Council as a rupture with Tradition, while for others, there is confusion and so they reject Vatican Council II.
__________________________
The German Catholic Church’s two-year Synodal Path, which began Sunday, must be about evangelization rather than “political or sociological process” or driven by a mainstream media ignorant of the Church, a German bishop has cautioned.
Lionel: Vatican Council II and all magisterial documents must be interpreted with Feeneyism, a rational approach in philosophy and theology. This would take the Church back to the old ecclesiology, with traditional mission and salvation doctrines.
When Vatican Council II is interpreted with Cushingism, an irrational approach in philosophy and theology, which is common, there is a rupture with the past theology and doctrines on mission and salvation.
_________________________________
Bishop Rudolf Voderholzer of Regensburg also said claims that “apocalyptic impulses” mean the Synodal Path is a kind of “last chance” for the Church to reform herself are “not helpful” but rather a form of “attempted coercion.”
Lionel. The Synodal Path depends upon the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. So it creates a rupture with traditional theology, ecclesiology, ecumenism,evangelisation etc.
_________________________________
“We will not be intimidated by this!” Bishop Voderholzer told faithful at an investiture of a new cathedral capitular, Professor Josel Kreiml, in Regensburg cathedral Nov. 30.
The Synodal Path, which began on the first day of Advent with informal talks, is aimed at discussing “key issues” arising from the clerical sex-abuse crisis, in particular the Catholic Church’s perennial teaching on priestly celibacy, human sexuality and the role of women in the Church.
Lionel: The Church's perennial teaching on salvation has been rejected by the German bishops, including the bishop of Regensburg and Pope Benedict.
__________________________________
But the meeting, whose first general assembly will be held on Jan. 30, has already attracted controversy, with critics concerned it will result in proposals that will undermine the Church’s teaching and possibly lead the German Church into schism.
Lionel: The German bishops are already in schism with the past popes on extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return. Since they interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise.It is only with the use of this false premise that there can be a new Synodal Path.
If Catholics in general in Germany, the lay people, are taught on how they can interpret the Council and other magisterial documents, in harmony with the past ecclesiology in Germany, this will be a big change in the Church in the country.
______________________________
Drawing on Pope Francis’ June 29 letter to the German faithful, Bishop Voderholzer said the Pope has stressed the importance of evangelization in the Synodal Path which, the bishop believes, “must be the guiding criterion of all our deliberations.”
“I myself was received by Pope Francis in private audience at the end of August, and he also told me once again with urgent words: ‘The essence of the Church is evangelization,’” he said.
Lionel: Yes but it is a proclamation of Jesus without the necessity of being a member of the Catholic Church for salvation.It is not a proclamation on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.It is not a support for the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return, upon which was based the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in politics and national laws.
_____________________
The Synodal Path must therefore be a “spiritual process, a common listening to the Gospel,” the bishop insisted, and “under no circumstances” be a “political or sociological process” driven by a “mainstream media that usually doesn’t understand anything about the nature of the Church.”
For this reason, he said he was “very saddened” that the statutes for the Synodal Path failed to “take into account the main concern of the Holy Father” by establishing a separate forum dedicated to the “New Evangelization.”
Bishop Voderholzer, who has threatened to withdraw from the two-year process if unity and evangelization are not given priority, said that with Prof. Kreiml assisting him on the synodal process, he wishes to bring the diocese into the Synodal Path “with full force” and to help promote the “unity of the Church” which the “sensus ecclesiae (sense of the Church) values.”
Kreiml, he said, is an “outstanding expert” on Joseph Ratzinger’s theology who understands the Church “with all her traditions, not as a corporation or a political party, but as a community of prayer,” and not as “managers but priests who live from daily common prayer and celebration of the Eucharist.”
Lionel: Cardinal Ratzinger's theology is the cause of the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.The interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church is heretical and it is now common throughout the Church. He did not correct Pope Paul VI when he interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism.Instead he produced Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus, based upon the irrational philosophy and theology and then projected it as the Deposit of the Faith.The Bishop of Regensburg could choose to interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism. Then the others could follow.-Lionel Andrades
John Allen Jr, the Knights of Columbus and the Boston Globe, the former parent company of Crux could do an investigation into how the U.S bishops recently ignored a discussion on the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II, inspite of so many reports on this subject on line.
John Allen Jr, the Knights of Columbus and the Boston Globe, the former parent company of Crux could do an investigation into how the U.S bishops recently ignored a discussion on the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II, inspite of so many reports on this subject on line.
If they were asked, all the U.S Bishops at the fall assembly in Baltimore, would say that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only. So they are not objective examples of salvation in 2019. They would agree unanimously.
So LG 8 etc cannot be practical exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the past ecclesiology and the traditional ecumenism of return.Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX on outside the Church there is no salvation.
The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made an objective and factual mistake and Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Center were correct.
The bishops of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops(USCCB) have been interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally, these 50 years, and now they can make the change. They can correct the error.
This is a major international story.
-Lionel Andrades
Labels:
Crux,
John Allen Jr.,
Knights of Columbus
Paul Lakeland - how to be sincere and teach ecclesiology with integrity would be an issue today.
Paul Lakeland has gone intro hibernation on Vatican Council II.Theology could now leave a sour taste in his mouth, when he teaches it at the University of Fairfield, Ohio.
An euphoria and liberalism on Vatican Council II, expressed as an author of a few books, has come to an unwelcome stop, now that he is informed that the Council is on the same wavelength on extra ecclesiam nulla salus, as Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
This was unknown to him for most of his life and as a professor of ecclesiology. So what is he going to teach now ? Will he still have to teach that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc are objective exceptions to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church, when he knows that they cannot really be exceptions.
Will he teach his students that Unitatis Redintigratio, the Decree on Ecumenism in Vatican Council II, is a rupture with the past ecumenism of return, when he knows that there are no such cases mentioned in the entire text of the Decree on Ecumenism.
How does he tell the truth to his liberal students at the University?. How to be sincere and teach with integrity should be an issue for him today.
-Lionel Andrades November 26, 2019
Paul Lakeland agrees that his interpretation of Vatican Council II was irrational and artificial : it was a false rupture with Tradition. He teaches a false theology at the University of Fairfield, Ohio
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/paul-lakeland-agrees-that-his.html
November 21, 2019
Prof.Paul Lakeland has made an objective eror in the interpretation of Lumen Gentium.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/profpaul-lakeland-has-made-objective.html
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
The National Catholic Reporter cannot keep posting reviews of books on Vatican Council II, in which the authors make the same mistake ( Graphics )
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-national-catholic-reporter-cannot.html
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
The National Catholic Reporter reviews of the books by Fr. Jared Wicks sj and Prof. Paul Lakeland on Vatican Council II were flawed. The authors made a mistake ( Graphics) https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-national-catholic-reporter-reviews.html
__________________________________________
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
The National Catholic Reporter's reviews of the books by Fr. Jared Wicks sj and Prof. Paul Lakeland on Vatican Council II, were flawed.The authors had made a mistake. Vatican Council II was interpreted by them with false reasoning.The NCR must admit it. Both authors read the Council superficially.Then they assumed hypothetical cases were objective exceptions to the past ecclesiology of the Church. This is irrational. So the authors conclusions and those of the editors and correspondents of the NCR were irrational, non traditional and an artifical rupture with Catholic theology and doctrines on salvation etc.
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters liberalism was based on an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.The National Catholic Reporter had two books reviewed, which interpreted Vatican Council II with the superficial and false reasoning.The books were authored by Paul Lakeland and Fr. Jared Wicks sj.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/massimo-faggiolis-and-michael-sean.html
NOVEMBER 19, 2019
Michael Sean Winters and Massimo Faggioli have converted ?
NOVEMBER 19, 2019
The Vatican websites in general have a mistake in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-vatican-websites-in-general-have.html
NOVEMBER 19, 2019
I am not a Lefebvrist or modernist from Boston College.Both groups interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/i-am-not-lefebvrist-or-modernist-from.html
I told the bishop that every one interprets Vatican Council II in the wrong way and it must be the same in his diocese in Africa
NOVEMBER 18, 2019
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/i-told-bishop-that-every-one-interprets.html
NOVEMBER 17, 2019
Pope Francis needs to tell Eugenio Scalfari that articles and reports in his newspaper on Vatican Council II have a built-in error : Andrea Tornielli needs to clean up the Vatican websites which carry the same mistake
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/pope-francis-needs-to-tell-eugenio.html
NOVEMBER 17, 2019
Will Michael Sean Winters now drop the usual name-dropping on Vatican Council II ?
ll
Will Michael Sean Winters now drop the usual name-dropping on Vatican Council II ?
Will Michael Sean Winters now drop the usual name-dropping on Vatican Council II ?
In his review of the book on Vatican Council by Fr. Jared Wicks sj., he mentioned the liberals who were present at the Council.But now we know that the days of telling us that Congar, Murray, Rahner, Ratzinger, Bea and others were present at the Council are over.
So what if they were present?
The Council is Feeneyite.The Council is traditional. The Council supports 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The Council does not mention any exceptions to the past ecclesiology.
So so what is Murray and Rahner were there at Vatican Council II.?!-Lionel Andrades
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters liberalism was based on an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.The National Catholic Reporter had two books reviewed, which interpreted Vatican Council II with the superficial and false reasoning.The books were authored by Paul Lakeland and Fr. Jared Wicks sj.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/massimo-faggiolis-and-michael-sean.html
NOVEMBER 19, 2019
Michael Sean Winters and Massimo Faggioli have converted ?
NOVEMBER 5, 2019
These are great days- when I say that Michael Sean Winters and Massimo Faggioli interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) like the traditionalist Brother Andre Marie MICM- and there is no denial from them.
2
NOVEMBER 4, 2019
Michael Sean Winters affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) since if asked he would say that the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) and LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to invisible and not visible people in 2019. So they are not practical exceptions to the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. I have sent him e-mails of these posts and there is no contradiction from him.
NOVEMBER 3, 2019
Michael Sean Winters affirms Vatican Council II and also the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) since the Council supports Feeneyite EENS when it is interpreted rationally.The Council is Feeneyite.He agrees with me.When he supports Fr. Leonard Feeney on EENS he is not in schism since the Council does the same when interpreted rationally.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)