Millions of people are being misinformed about the Catholic Church through Wikipedia. With Cushingism, Wikipedia projects Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition. If Wikipedia interpreted Vatican Council II rationally the Council (AG 7, LG 14) would be in harmony with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Fourth Lateran Council, 1215).This is a major error on Wikipedia.
Today Catholics do not have to interpret
Vatican Council II like Wikipedia. They have a rational option. They must not
interpret invisible cases of LG 16 etc as being visible persons in 2023 saved
outside the Catholic Church. This is Wikipedia’s mistake.Wikipedia does not mention that the change in doctrine and theology and revelation comes only with Cushingism i.e the Council is interpreted with a fake premise.
Support for aggiornamento won out over resistance to change, and as a result the sixteen magisterial documents produced by the council proposed significant developments in doctrine and practice: an extensive reform of the liturgy; a renewed theology of the Church, of revelation and of the laity; and new approaches to relations between the Church and the world, to ecumenism, to non-Christian religions.. -Vatican Council II (Wikipedia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Vatican_Council
We can affirm Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 in harmony with the Council of Florence (1442) on extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and not project invisible cases of LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being visible exceptions for EENS
This was not known to Fr. William Most, Jeff Mirus, EWTN and Catholic Culture/Trinity
Communications. They have posted a Cushingite report titled, The Tragic Errors
of Fr. Leonard Feeney’. Vatican Council II is made a rupture
with Tradition (EENS, Athanasius Creed etc) by confusing what is invisible (LG
8 etc) as being visible (exceptions for EENS etc).
This is
political-Left. It is not Catholic.
EWTN APOLOGISTS POLITICAL
The
apologists and journalists associated with EWTN are obligated to interpret
Vatican Council II irrationally to keep their job. They are not allowed to
affirm Feeneyite EENS.
Fr.Mitch
Pacwa, Raymond Arroyo, Edward Pentin and others are interpreting Vatican
Council II irrationally, even after being informed. So they are not criticized
by Reuters and the Associated Press in the USA.
Millions of
Catholics are being duped by EWTN for political reasons.
Catholic
Answers admit that they are rejecting the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church.
They can only do this by interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally.
EWTN’s coverage of pilgrimages to Israel and Catholic events in the Holy Land are biased. Only those people are projected who will not cite AG 7 and LG 14 and say all Jews and Muslims, need faith and the baptism of water for salvation from Hell and there are no known exceptions in LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc.
To save their souls from Hell all need to be Catholic. Teresa Tomeo will not say this.
On EWTN there were no discussions on Ratisbonne with Vatican Council II
interpreted rationally. There are no EWTN programs which say that the Church’s
exclusivist ecclesiology has not changed with Vatican Council II (rational). So
there is no change in faith and morals.Fr. James Martin sj cannot innovate on homosexual
sins.
There is no
kerygma without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church (LG 14 etc).
The USCCB
bishops are keeping things under wraps. So they are not opposing Wikipedia and
the Synods with Vatican Council II (rational).
They
allow Wikipedia to continue with their present propaganda on Vatican Council
II. Jimmy Akins gets a monthly salary it is reported. So he will not correct
the mistake on Wikipedia. Michael Warsaw has to protect his position, too. - Lionel Andrades
UNE 13, 2017
Wikipedia is misleading on Catholic theology
Wikipedia is misleading on 'Salvation outside the church'. It interprets the subject with Cushingism instead of rational Feeneyism.
Salvation outside the church-Catholic Theology- WIKIPEDIA
SUBSISTENCE- ECCLESIOLOGY-WIKIPEDIA
SUBSISTENCE IS THE DOCTRINE THAT THE CHURCH OF CHRIST "SUBSISTS IN" THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. THE DOCTRINE IS IN CONTINUITY WITH THE PREVIOUS PHRASING OF MYSTICI CORPORIS CHRISTI THAT THE CHURCH OF CHRIST "IS" (EST) THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, ALTHOUGH SOME THEOLOGIANS HAVE INTERPRETED THE PHRASE TO BE A RUPTURE WITH THE PREVIOUS TRADITION.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feeneyism
________________________
FR.LEONARD FEENEY -WIKIPEDIA
MAY 19, 2023
Wikipedia's entry on Feeneyism is irrational and political. It is not Catholic. Neither is it ethical.
Wikipedia’s entry on Feneeyism is false. Feeneyites do not reject the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. They instead interpret them as being hypothetical cases only. This is something obvious. They reject the baptism of desire etc as being an exception for extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Thoeretical cases of the baptism of desire are not objective exceptions, or relevant to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). They do not exist in our reality.
Fr. Leonard Feeney interpreted EENS with no exceptions and so did the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) which defined EENS. These two Councils were ‘Feeneyite’.
Also for Feeneyites, Vatican Council II does not contradict the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors or the dogma EENS. Since LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer always, to only hypothetical cases.This is interpreting Vatican Council II rationally.It is not confusing, what is invisible as being physically visible and then making false inferences.This is what Wikipedia does . If someone is saved outside the Catholic Church it can only be known to God. The norm for salvation is Catholic faith and the baptism of water (AG 7, LG 14 etc).- Lionel Andrades
________________________
JULY 5, 2016
The ordinary magisterium has replaced the traditional Feeneyite theology with irrational and non traditional Cushingite theology :Wikipedia's errors on EENS