I AM A KING
*
REX SUM EGO
Ego in hoc natus sum
et ad hoc veni in mundum,
ut testimonium perhibeam veritati:
omnis, qui est ex veritate,
audit vocem meam.
#ChristusRex
#ChristTheKing
#CristoRey
#FêteDuChristRoi
#Christkönigfest
1
18
60
Lionel's blog
Matteo Salvini does not know theology like most Catholics.So they are easily fooled.If Salvini understood, then he could ask Pope Francis how could LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2,GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II be objective exceptions to the past popes and the historical 'triumphalism' of the Catholic Church in Italy ? How can there be a new culture with new salvation doctrines and a new ecclesiology created with a false premise ; created by confusing what is invisible as being visible ? Where are the cases of non Catholic being saved outside the Church ?
Salvini and the Orthodox Jews, who oppose abortion and homosexuality, are not allowed to meet the pope.. -Lionel Andrades
The priests in Rome who offer the Byzantine Greek Mass also interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise. They are following the new ecclesiology based upon the irrational premise.So there is a rupture with the traditional exclusivist salvation theology of the Church Fathers and the Apostles. -Lionel Andrades
Cushingism sees hypothetical cases as being non hypothetical in Newton's time and space. The result is a new false theology and a new false physics.With Cushingism Pope Benedict creates for himself what he calls the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. -Lionel Andrades
Amazon, Oxford, Ignatius and Angelus Press are probably working on another book on Vatican Council II interpreted with the common fake premise,inference and non traditional conclusion. -Lionel Andrades
Feeneyism is to see hypothetical cases as just being hypothetical.When Vatican Council II is not interpreted with Feeneyism a Catholic does not have an identity. - Lionel Andrades
Fr.Charles Curran's books are being promoted at the front display window of the Daughters of St. Paul book shop, near the Vatican.
Curran considers hypothetical cases, which exist only in his mind,as objective exceptions to the old moral law.
He promotes imaginary scenarios and then makes believe that they are real.
Catholics living in sin find it useful. They need to believe that Curran is correct and that the unknown exception contradicts the Biblical rule which indicates they are on the way to Hell. -Lionel Andrades
John Allen Jr.,Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters have no comment on Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise . It's a subject they do not want to write about. -Lionel Andrades
Cardinal Kasper, Archbishop Bruno Forte and Bishop Marcello Semeraro's books on Ecclesiology could be thrown out.They generally use a false premise to create a new theology , a new ecclesiology.
Their books promote the familiar ' development of doctrine based upon a false premise'. These books are Recommended Reading at Ecclesiology semesters at Pontifical Universities.They are approved by Pope Benedict and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. -Lionel Andrades
Rad Trad Fr. Dwight Longenecker would know that if he did not use the fake premise to interpret Vatican Counci II he would be affirming Feeneyite EENS like the St. Benedict Center in the USA. -Lionel Andrades
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II exist only in our mind. There are no objective cases in October 2020. -Lionel Andrades
Jim Russel used the false premise to interpret the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and Vatican Council II and then criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney for not doing the same.
CMTV is Cushingite on Vatican Council II.They are not Feeneyite on the Council.
May be they have to assure the Archbishop of Detroit and the USCCB that they interpret Magisterial documents ( Creeds and Catechisms) with the false premise.In this way they create a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition and so remain politically correct. -Lionel Andrades
Jim Russell and Michael Voris interpreted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO) and Vatican Council II with a false premise and then criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney for not doing the same. If they did not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and LOHO , there would be no rupture with Feeneyite EENS. Vatican Council II really supports the strict interpretation of EENS when the false premise is not used to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc. -:Lionel Andrades
No speaker has been invited to the Annual Cushingite Catholic Identity Conference, who interprets Vatican Council II without the false premise and inference. The Lefebvrist model approved by the Left is the norm. Their theology is Cushingite like that of the liberals. -Lionel Andrades
Yesterday the congregation at Holy Mass in Italian had to respond to the Profession of Faith in a questiona and answer form. I responded like every one else knowing that the priests, religious community and lay people there, interpreted the Creeds, Catechisms and Vatican Council II with Cushingism and I interpret them with Feeneyism.So our doctrines and theology are different.
Cushingism assumes hypothetical and invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, GS 22 etc are non hypothetical and objective in the present times( 1965-2020). So objective exceptions to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church emerge.
Feeneyism recognises that hypothetical and invisible cases are just that. So there are no objective exceptions to EENS, the Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors etc.
So our Profession of Faith is different on the Nicene Creed, Apostles Creed, Athanasius Creed, Catechism of Pope Pius X, Catechism of the Council of Trent, Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994), Vatican Council II, the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance etc. -Lionel Andrades
It is good to stay with Sacred Tradition since the present 'magisterium' differs from the past Magisterium on extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( without known exceptions), the Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors, Catechism of Pope Pius X...
In the past the Magisterium did not use a false premise to interpret Church documents and so create an artificial rupture with Tradition ( Catechism of the Council of Trent etc ). -Lionel Andrades