Like even Cardinal Sean O'Malley, the Archbishop of Boston, they all accept the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.It infers that salvation in Heaven ( baptism of desire etc) is visible to us on earth to be exceptions to the dogma.These ghosts, spirits, phantoms, are allegedly living exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
This new theory in the Catholic Church has also been accepted by apologists Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Fr.William Most and Fr.Michael Muller, C.Ss.R.Their books are sold by the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX).
![Foto: The 2014-2015 academic year for Immaculate Heart of Mary School, our small school here on the monastery grounds, will begin tomorrow. Please pray for all our students and staff.](https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/v/t1.0-9/p235x350/10625066_10152698948899204_4577219204654246423_n.jpg?oh=7df6890ccac695561471eb956e1c5160&oe=54C5E5D4&__gda__=1422675823_3980f821b23cc22c6c20b556c08bc40a)
If the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary accepted Vatican Council II, with the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance as being only hypothethical probabilities ( and they cannot be anything else), then Vatican Council II would be in agreement with Fr.Leonard Feeney.Vatican Council II would be Feeneyite.
This would not be acceptable to the bishops who have given Fr.Leonard Feeney's communities official recognition.So novices and postulants with the MCM, Still River and Richmond,N.H, interpret Vatican Council II with this irrationality. The dead are visible for them in the New England area.
![foto di Sisters, Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.](https://scontent-a-mxp.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/s851x315/10320467_264817973701170_5605409209688200242_n.jpg?oh=6288cf50977b32b35bdc3a7c18d42ae7&oe=54932D99)
The SSPX priests use Cushingism to interpret the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and Vatican Council II - so do the MICM. The bishops are satisfied and so is the Jewish Left.Cushingism is irrational, non traditional and heretical but it is also politically correct.
There are no existing cases of the baptism of desire etc yet the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 has created a theology as if these cases exist in real life. This theology is used in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.The same theology is used by traditionalists and liberals( modernists heretics).There are no known cases but a theology of existing cases has been explained in the Letter of the Holy Office;precept and means etc.
![Foto: Finishing up a busy day in Saint Clare's Hostmaking Room.](https://scontent-b-mxp.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/p235x350/10377152_326696107513356_7673178728052057176_n.jpg?oh=4fd475aa97a36efd3b7bdf30b8c83ceb&oe=5490100E)
I reject this irrational inference and do not use it in the interpretation of Vatican Councl II and other magisterial documents. I affirm Vatican Council II in which NA 2,UR 3,LG 8,LG 16 etc are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
I reject the irrational inference used in the Letter of the Holy Office to imply that there are known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Leonard Feeney. No such case exists in 2014.
The first part of the Letter supports Fr.Leonard Feeney on doctrine and dogma. The second part is confusing and Cushingite.The Archdiocese of Boston made the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 public, three years after it was issued . The cardinal who issued the Letter,it is reported, had died at that time.The Holy Office never objected.
-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment