Lionel Andrades
@AndradesLionel
| 24 ago | |
@paulkramer0 It shows you have still not understood what I have been writing on my blog .
| ||
Lionel Andrades
@AndradesLionel
| 24 ago | |
@paulkramer0 Are you saying the new ecclesiology contradicts extra ecclesiam nulla salus ?
| ||
Lionel Andrades
@AndradesLionel
| 24 ago | |
@paulkramer0 If you point out LG 16,LG 8, UR3, NA 2 etc as being exceptions to EENS I would say they are inivisible for us in 2015.
| ||
Lionel Andrades
@AndradesLionel
| 24 ago | |
@paulkramer0 So you would not be able to cite any case in Vatican Council II as being an exception to EENS. Since an exception must exist.
| ||
Lionel Andrades
@AndradesLionel
| 24 ago | |
@paulkramer0 When you would not be able to cite any exception to EENS in Vatican Council II you would be left with the old ecclesiology.
| ||
@AndradesLionel
| ||
@paulkramer0 So if the ecclesiology of Vatican Council II is the same as pre-Vatican Council II times there is no reason for sedevacantism.
| ||
No comments:
Post a Comment