APRIL 9, 2017
Present Magisterium is misusing the word 'Magisterium': Fr.Alessandro Minutella was suspended for not accepting heresy and false theology and doctrines
There is a relation between Scripture, Tradition and Magisterium.This is true.However the Church has been infiltrated.There is a false church within the Catholic Church as the parish priest Fr.Alessandro Minutella in Palermo said in public.He was suspended by the Archbishop of Palermo, Corrado Lorefice,who once drove a bicycle within the church.
What if the magisterium today is false and is teaching false theology and doctrine in a false church ? Is this possible ? Yes.
There is a specific rupture in Palermo, for example, between the present magisterium and Scipture and Tradition.
Archbishop Lorefice in his Letter suspending Fr. Alessandro Minutella says :
'(Fr.Alessandro) have taken a strong position of dissent in stark opposition to the Catholic hierarchy headed by the current Roman pontiff and even against your bishop to whom you are obliged to show reverence and obedience (Canon 273),the promise you made during priestly ordination and which you confirmed when assuming the office of pastor.'1
Fr.Alessandro was in dissent against the heresy of the magisterium,from the pontiff to the bishops.Archbishop Lorefice tells his parish priest that he has to accept the heresy and dissent of the magisterium.He has to show reverence and obedience towards it.Since he did not do so by discussing the issue in public,he was suspended.
Meanwhile there has been no denial from the Archbishop of Palermo or any priest there, nor from the Vatican, when I listed the heresies and irrationalities being taught today by the Catholic hierarchy, the magisterium, which cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.2
I have mentioned them on my blogEucharistandMissionand on GloriaTV.Ecclesia Dei and the CDF are familiar with what I have been writing about, repeatedly, for some six years.
I have mentioned them on my blogEucharistandMissionand on GloriaTV.Ecclesia Dei and the CDF are familiar with what I have been writing about, repeatedly, for some six years.
The teachings and beliefs of Archbishop Lorefice are not guided by the Holy Spirit and are not Catholic.
The Holy Spirit cannot teach error.Jesus did not give the keys to St.Peter to teach error.
They are an innovation in the Church, which has been made 'magisterial' by the false-church magisterium.
The Holy Spirit cannot teach error.Jesus did not give the keys to St.Peter to teach error.
They are an innovation in the Church, which has been made 'magisterial' by the false-church magisterium.
The doctrines and conclusions of Lorefice and the Vatican's present day teachings are based on the theology of Cushingism, which is irrational, non traditional and heretical.Vatican Council II interpreted with Cushingism produces a conclusion which is a rupture with Tradition.
Yet the word 'magisterium' is bandied about freely by the false church within the Catholic Church, which Minutella referred to in public and got himself suspended in Palermo.
The false call to obey a false magisterium is not there only in Lorefice's Letter to Minutella,but in many 'magisterial documents'.
We find it there also in 'magisterial documents' like Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger'sRedemptoris Missio.It is based on the theology of Cushingism!
Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus are Cushingite!
Cardinal Ratzinger did not interpret Vatican Council II with the theology of Feeneyism i.e invisible cases are not visible in the present times, invisible baptism of desire is not visible in personal cases,so there are no known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in 2017.
Here are some of Redemptoris Missio's references to the Magisterium.
51.As Pope Paul VI recalled, every community must live in union with the particular and the universal Church, in heartfelt communion with the Church's pastors and the Magisterium, with a commitment to missionary outreach and without yielding to isolationism or ideological exploitation...-Redemptoris Missio
We have to be aware that in this first document of Cardinal Ratzinger, as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, he was using a false theology.He affimed the false Church.He did not choose to interpret Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Feeneyism.He chose heresy as Prefect of the CDF.May be it was something he overlooked innocently.
55.All of this has been given ample emphasis by the Council and the subsequent Magisterium, without detracting in any way from the fact that salvation comes from Christ and that dialogue does not dispense from evangelization.-Redemptoris Missio
Here he is saying that salvation comes from Christ and he means that it excludes being a member of the Catholic Church. So there is no exclusivist ecclesiology of the past.It is vague Christology which can be used by other Christian communities too, for salvation.It is Jesus without the Catholic Church.This is the bad theology, the false theology of two theological papers of the International Theological Commission,'Christianity and the World Religions' and 'The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without Baptism''.
Sadly this was the false church-reasoning used by Cardinal Ratzinger in the excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre.The CDF interpreted Vatican Council II as a break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite) since LG 16, LG 8, UR 3 etc referred to explicit and visible cases.When Lefebvre protested against Vatican Council II ( Cushingism) being a rupture with Tradition and went ahead with the unapproved ordination of traditionalist bishops, he was excommunicated.Lefebvre was up against the false Church which was not going to interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.
Lefebvre was also unaware of how ecclesiastical Masonry changed the teachings of the Church on exclusivist salvation at Boston and Rome in the 1949 injustice against Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Center.
Sadly this was the false church-reasoning used by Cardinal Ratzinger in the excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre.The CDF interpreted Vatican Council II as a break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite) since LG 16, LG 8, UR 3 etc referred to explicit and visible cases.When Lefebvre protested against Vatican Council II ( Cushingism) being a rupture with Tradition and went ahead with the unapproved ordination of traditionalist bishops, he was excommunicated.Lefebvre was up against the false Church which was not going to interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.
Lefebvre was also unaware of how ecclesiastical Masonry changed the teachings of the Church on exclusivist salvation at Boston and Rome in the 1949 injustice against Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Center.
(Note: There is a computer hitch.Please
excuse the type matter being posted in
this disorganised way. It is out of
my control).
excuse the type matter being posted in
this disorganised way. It is out of
my control).
No comments:
Post a Comment