AUGUST 17, 2017
Bishops Fellay, Schneider are not proclaiming the Social Reign of Christ the King supported by Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite)
Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Bishop Bernard Fellay mention the Social Reign of Christ the King and the lack of its proclamtion or implementation, as if Vatican Council II was an impediment.They now know that Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) supports the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
Upon Feeneyite EENS the old ecclesiology of the Church was based.So with the old ecclesiology they are free to uphold the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State.
VATICAN COUNCIL II SUPPORTS OUTSIDE THE CHURCH THERE IS NO SALVATION
Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) supports outside the Church there is no salvation.So it is a priority that all political legislation have God as its center, as known in only the Catholic Church and there is no impediment in the Council.
APPEAL TO CATHOLICS TO SUPPORT POLITICAL PARTIES
Bishop Fellay and Schneider could appeal to the faithful to support those Catholic political parties which uphold that Jesus, as he is known in the Catholic Church, should be the measure to decide political legislation and government.
They can also ask the Catholic political parties which support the separation of Satanic secularism and State, to affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).Then ask the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the two popes to do the same.
CUSHINGITE THEOLOGY OPPOSES THE SOCIAL KINGSHIP OF CHRIST
Presently bishops Fellay and Schneider like the two popes and the Vatican Curia interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism.So with exceptions to the dogma EENS the old ecclesiology of the Church is put away.With the present new ecclesiology based on Cushingism, there is support for a new ecumenism and non Catholics do not need to convert for salvation.With Cushingism they could be saved with visible for us baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I).With this Cushingite reasoning everyone does not need to be a member of the Church and so the non separation of Church and State and the proclamation of the Kingship of Christ over all political legislation is not a priority.
This has to be rejected by Bishop Fellay and Bishop Schneider and the Catholic political parties.It is irrational and violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.This cannot be the teaching of the Holy Spirit.The reasoning is not honest and this deception cannot be Catholic philosophy or theology.
As I mentioned in a previous blog post 1 Bishop Schneide is not affirming the Social Reign of Christ the King based on Vatican Council II( without the irrational premise).It is the same with Bishop Fellay and the SSPX bishops and priests.
They are not rejecting the new ecumenism which is founded on LG 16, UR 3 etc being mistaken as visible exceptions to the dogma EENS and AG 7.
They are not affirming the old ecumenism of the Church based on the old ecclesiology which is intact with AG 7 and UR 3, LG 16 etc not being an exception.
They are not affirming exclusivist salvation in the Catholic Church based on the dogma EENS and AG 7.-Lionel Andrades
1.
1.
AUGUST 16, 2017
Bishop Athanasius Schneider does not proclaim the Catholic Faith honestly in Kazhkistan
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/bishop-athanasius-schneider-does-not.html
JULY 17, 2017
Catholic political parties must teach Catholics the faith which is not being taught by religious due to political pressure
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/catholic-political-parties-must-teach.html
MAY 3, 2017
Andrzej Duda President of Poland does not note the split between Church doctrine and State in Poland because of Cushingism
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/05/andrzej-dudathe-president-of-poland.html
DECEMBER 19, 2016
Catholics will not vote for the Catholic political parties :The four cardinals are using an irrational philosophy to reject the traditional ecclesiology and interpret Vatican Council II with the same irrationality
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/catholics-will-not-vote-for-catholic.html
NOVEMBER 18, 2016
The two Catholic political organisations are Forza Nuova and Militia Christi. These two lay organisations should be supported in some way this feast of Christ the King
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/11/the-two-catholic-political.html
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 16, 2017
Bishop Athanasius Schneider does not proclaim the Catholic Faith honestly in Kazhkistan
DOES NOT PROCLAIM SYLLABUS OF ERRORS
He could affirm the Syllabus of Errors in harmony with Vatican Council II ( without the Cushingite error) on ecumenism, Social Reign of Christ the King, exclusive salvation in the Church etc.
He could initiate Mission in Kazhakistan and the rest of the world by announcing that all Muslims there are on the way to Hell according to Vatican Council II(AG 7, LG 14) since they die without ' faith and baptism' needed for salvation.
With reference to Vatican Council II he could announce that there are no visible and known exceptions to Ad Gentes 7( all need faith and baptism for salvation) in 2017 Khazakistan where he is a bishop.
NO PRACTICAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA EENS IN VATICAN COUNCIL II
NO PRACTICAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA EENS IN VATICAN COUNCIL II
Neither are there any practical exceptions to the dogma EENS mentioned in Vatican Council II since LG 16,LG 8, LG 14, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, AG 11, AG 7 etc refer to hypothetical and theoretical cases.They are not visible and known people in the present or past. They are not living examples of salvation outside the Church.They do not contradict Ad Gentes 7. Neither do they contradict EENS as it was known to the magisterium, for example, in the 16th century.LG 16 does not contradict AG 7.Why does he not announce this in his interviews on Vatican Council II?
VATICAN COUNCIL II IS FEENEYITE
VATICAN COUNCIL II IS FEENEYITE
So outside the Church there is no salvation is the teaching of Vatican Council II(AG 7) and LG 16 etc is not an exception to Feeneyite EENS. The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake when it wrongly assumed invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) were visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.The error was repeated in Vatican Council II however the Council can still be interpreted in harmony with Tradition when the explicit-implicit, visible-invisible mistake is not made.
Since there is no salvation outside the Church according to Vatican Council II there is no change in the ecclesiology of the Church, the pre and post Vatican Council II ecclesiology is the same.
PAST ECCLESIOLOGY INTACT WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II
PAST ECCLESIOLOGY INTACT WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II
With the past ecclesiology intact there can only be an ecumenism of return and the need for Orthodox Catholics, Lutherans, Pentecostals and Evangelicals and other Christians to formally enter the Catholic Church to avoid the fires of Hell.This is not the Vatican Council II affirmed by Bishop Schneider in his writings and statements.
Since there is the priority for all people to enter the Catholic Church he could proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State.This is a priority for a Catholic.
SCHNEIDER DOES NOT AFFIRM SOCIAL REIGN OF CHRIST THE KING
SCHNEIDER DOES NOT AFFIRM SOCIAL REIGN OF CHRIST THE KING
But he is not affirming the Social Reign of Christ the King based on Vatican Council II( without the irrational premise).
He is not rejecting the new ecumenism which is founded on LG 16, UR 3 etc being mistaken as visible exceptions to the dogma EENS and AG 7.
He is not affirming the old ecumenism of the Church based on the old ecclesiology which is intact with AG 7 and UR 3, LG 16 etc not being an exception.
He is not affirming exclusivist salvation in the Catholic Church based on the dogma EENS and AG 7.
I hope Bishop Athanasius Schneider will not issue one of his usual statements on Vatican Council II since they are heretical, non traditional,irrational and appreciated by the magisterium and the political Left.He has not responded to reports and comments I made on his May interview to a Polish publication.-Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 15, 2017
Vatican Council II is a legitimate,dogmatic,pastoral,exclusivist and traditional Council : it is a rupture with Schneider, Burke, Kohl and Kasper
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/vatican-council-ii-is.html
AUGUST 15, 2017
For the Sacred Heart Major Seminary Detroit Vatican Council II is not exclusivist or traditional as it is for me
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/for-sacred-heart-major-seminary-detroit.html
__________________________________________
JULY 25, 2017
Bishop Athanasius Schneider does not respond to e-mails or reports on the Internet : Pope Francis has made an objective mistake and violates the Principle of No Contradiction in the interpretation of Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/bishop-athansius-schneider-does-not.html
JULY 22, 2017
Bishop Schneider will not say that Pope Francis has made an objective mistake and violates the Principle of Non Contradiction
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/bishop-schneider-will-not-say-that-pope.html
JULY 22, 2017
Rorate Caeili and Bishop Schneider do not write that Pope Francis made a factual mistake, an objective error in his interpretation of Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/rorate-caeili-and-bishop-schneider-do.html
JULY 21, 2017
Bishop Athanasius Schneider still incoherent and confused : has repeated last report without addressing previous critical points
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/bishop-athanasius-schneider-still.html
TUESDAY, JULY 25, 2017
Bishop Athanasius Schneider does not respond to e-mails or reports on the Internet : Pope Francis has made an objective mistake and violates the Principle of No Contradiction in the interpretation of Vatican Council II
Bishop Athanasius Schneider will still not say that Pope Francis has made an objective mistake and violates the Principle of No Contradiction in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents even after I have e-mailed him and there are numerous reports on the Internet.He is protecting himself. Soon he will issue another report on the Internet or do an interview on the subject of Vatican Council II.He will interpret the Council with the same irrational premise. He will choose Vatican Council II Cushingite instead of Feeneyite, since this is expected him of him by the Vatican.
He calls upon Catholics to proclaim the truth but he will not do it since it could be an expensive sacrifice to make.
His statements otherwise on Vatican Council II are vague and politically accommodating. He will say there is salvation in only the Catholic Church but will not say that there are no exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).He will not affirm Feeneyite EENS since invisible baptism of desire is a visible exception for him, to the strict interpretation, as it was known in the 16th century.
He is a modernist on this sensitive issue while he otherwise criticizes modernism in the Catholic Church.
“We are living in a very special time of a deep crisis of faith inside the Church,” said Bishop Athanasius Schneider, the Auxiliary in the diocese of Maria Santissima in Kazakhstan, who opens the video, produced by LifeSiteNews and yet he will not say that Pope Francis has made an objective mistake and violates the Principle of No Contradiction in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents
Cardinal Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider accept the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which made the objective mistake. It mixed up invisible cases as being visible.This determines how they and the popes interpret Vatican Council II.If they would believe that Cardinal Richard Cushing and not Fr.Leonard Feeney was in heresy in 1949 then the interpretation of Vatican Council II changes.
If Cardinal Cushing was wrong to assume there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus then Vatican Council II is traditional and has the old ecclesiology.Since there would no be exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to the dogma EENS as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.
Presently Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider both reject Feeneyism which says, according to me, that there are no known exceptions to the dogma EENS.For them there are exceptions!
For them the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to known people saved without the baptism of water.So LG 16 etc becomes an objective and known exception to the dogma EENS, even though there are no such cases on earth.Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with Tradition because of their personal irrationality and not because of the text of the Council.
The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 assumed that imaginary cases of the baptism of desire etc were not imaginary. This same error in reasoning is made by Cardinal Burke and Bishop Athansius Schneider.
Bishop Athanasius Schneider has called for a Syllabus of Errors on Vatican Council II and Cardinal Burke has called for a new catechesis when both of them do not see the factual mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, upon which so much of Vatican Council II,and their theology, is based.
Vatican Council II does not haev a hermeneutic of continuity only when hypothetical cases are considered explicit.Subjective cases are considered objective.
If they correct this error and re-read Vatican Council II ,without the premise from 1949 Letter of the Holy Office, the Council does not contradict the traditional teachings of the Church on other religions and Christian communities.
Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) does not contradict the original Syllabus of Errors or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).So there is no need for a new Syllabus of Errors.
The new ecumenism is based on Cushingite theology created by the false premise. With the old ecclesiology intact; with Feeneyism, there can only be an old ecclesiology and so only an ecumenism of return.
-Lionel Andrades
JULY 22, 2017
Bishop Schneider will not say that Pope Francis has made an objective mistake and violates the Principle of Non Contradiction
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/bishop-schneider-will-not-say-that-pope.html
JULY 22, 2017
Rorate Caeili and Bishop Schneider do not write that Pope Francis made a factual mistake, an objective error in his interpretation of Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/rorate-caeili-and-bishop-schneider-do.html
ULY 21, 2017
Bishop Athanasius Schneider still incoherent and confused : has repeated last report without addressing previous critical points
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/bishop-athanasius-schneider-still.html
JULY 19, 2017
When will Rorate Caeili learn?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/when-will-rorate-caeili-learn.html
JULY 17, 2017
Catholic political parties must teach Catholics the faith which is not being taught by religious due to political pressure
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/catholic-political-parties-must-teach.html
JULY 16, 2017
Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi do not deny that Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and non traditional conclusion
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/ralph-martin-and-robert-fastiggi-do-not.html
JULY 14, 2017
Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi, John Martignoni and Fr. Stefano Visintin osb indicate Pope Francis has violated the Principle of Non Contradiction in his interpretation of Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/ralph-martin-robert-fastiggi-john_27.html
JULY 13, 2017
Pope Francis violates the Principle of Non Contradiction: chooses irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II which is not the work of the Holy Spirit
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/pope-francis-violates-principle-of-non.html
JULY 13, 2017
Prof. Robert Fastiggi, Ralph Martin agree that invisible people cannot be visible at the same time : in agreement with Fr. Stefano Visintin's statement
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/prof-robert-fastiggi-ralph-martin-agree.html
JULY 11, 2017
Fr.Stefano Visintin osb new Rector University of St. Anselm at loggerheads with Cardinal Ladaria: attack on the New Theology with hard facts
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/frstefano-visintin-osb-new-rector.html
JULY 11, 2017
Scientist-Benedictine priest who says the baptism of desire was never an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is the new Rector at St. Anselm, Rome
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/scientist-benedictine-priest-who-says.html
JULY 6, 2017
Everything hinges on visible baptism of desire : correct the premise and change the Council
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/everything-hinges-on-visible-baptism-of.html
JULY 5, 2017
To accomodate the error of visible baptism of desire Cardinal Ratzinger changed the Profession of Faith, Oath of Fidelity and Canon Law
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/to-accomodate-error-of-visible-baptism.html
JULY 3, 2017
The bottom line is that we are all reciting the Nicene Creed but there are two different interpretations
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/the-bottom-line-is-that-we-are-all.html
JULY 2, 2017
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.j made factual errors in two ITC theological papers which were politically correct
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-sj-made-factual.html
JULY 1, 2017
Solemn Tridentine Rite Mass tomorrow with manifest sacrilege
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/solemn-tridentine-rite-mass-tomorrow.html
JUNE 30, 2017
Tridentine Rite Mass in Rome is a sacrilege : needs to be challenged canonically
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/06/tridentine-rite-mass-in-rome-is.html
No comments:
Post a Comment