The books by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre are as obsolete as those of the liberals Kung and Kasper, since he used a false premise to interpret the Council and did not know how the Council could be interpreted without the irrationality.So today it is no more an issue of traditionalists versus the liberals.Both camps are Cushingite and not Feeneyite on Vatican Council II.
For all of them 'the red was an exception to the blue', when the red really referred to 'zero cases', 'zero passages' in Vatican Council II. 1
So the books by Roberto dei Mattei, Paulo Pasqualucci, Cristina Siccardi and others sold at the SSPX chapel are also obsolete.They assume the red is an exception to the blue and so misinterpret the Council.
They were correct in their conclusion that the Church was a rupture with Tradition.
But they were not aware of their Cushingite interpretation of the Council which causes the break with Tradition. They also did not interpret Vatican Council II, with Feeneyism, to affirm the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus).
There are no physical bodies of non Catholics saved without faith and baptism, in Newton's time and space. To assume there are such cases and then make a new theology based upon this irrationality, is not Catholic Tradition.Yet this was done by the traditionalists too after they accepted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
This is the new theology of the traditionalists and liberals, the former reject the conclusion and the latter accept it. Neither of the two interpret the Council without the irrationality and accept the traditional conclusion.
-Lionel Andrades
-Lionel Andrades
1
- Red being an exception to the blue -Vatican Documents (1)
- Red is an exception to the blue-Bologna School/ Fr.John Zuhlsdorf (4)
- Red is not an exception to the blue - Proclamation (2)
- Red is not an exception to the blue - profances Holy Mass (1)
- Red is not an exception to the blue :CCC 846-848 (4)
- Red not an exception to blue mapping (1)
No comments:
Post a Comment