The Franciscans of the
Immaculate can ask the Commissar Fr. Sabino Ardito sdb and Canonical Consultant
Fr. Gianfranco Ghirlanda sj if the books on Vatican Council II in general can
be dispensed with . Since they have been written with a False Premise,
Inference and non traditional conclusion.
This would include the books of Pope Benedict , Cardinal Kasper and Cardinal Semararo but also those of Fr. Serafino Lanzetta, Moms.Brunero Gherardino and Roberto dei Mattei.They all interpreted Vatican Council II with the False Premise.
The interpretation of
Vatican Council II by Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School (FSCIRE) can no more
be accepted. Since Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents read with
a Rational Premise has a traditional conclusion.The Council is in harmony with
the past Magisterium on the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla
salus, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of Pope Pius X
etc.
Fr. Gianfranco Ghirlanda
is an author of books on Canon Law. He also needs to clarify for the Canonical
Associations in Italy, the Roman Rota and the Jesuit Superior General, that he
interprets Vatican Councuil II only with
the Rational Premise.
Vatican Council II
interpreted with the Rational Premise has LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22
etc being hypothetical and not objective in 2021.This is something
obvious.It is commom sense.Invisible cases in real life are not practical
exceptions for EENS. If in a box of oranges there is an apple, the apple is an
exception not only because it is different but because it is there in that box.
So the Syllabus of
Errors with the exclusivist ecumenism
and ecclesiocentric inter-religious dialogue, or mission, has no exception among invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc,
in Vatican Council II. There is no break with the past ecclesiocentrism of the
Catholic Church.There are no objective examples of salvation outside the
Church, without faith and baptism in 1965-2021.
The norm for salvation
is faith and baptism and if there is an exception it can only be known to God. There is no
extraordinary means of salvation known to us human beings. Since physically we
cannot meet or see someone saved with the baptism of desire, baptism of blood
or invincible ignorance etc.
We cannot say that there
were 20 cases of the baptism of desire last year and 10 cases of persons who
were saved in invincible ignorance the previous year.
So with the Rational Interpretation of Vatican Council II( LG 8, LG 16 etc are invisible) and the Irrational Interpretation ( LG 8, LG 16 etc are visible) we have two interpretations of the Council and so the different pastoral approaches since the theology is new ( with exceptions) or old ( without exceptions) and the doctrine is new ( outside the Church there is salvation) or old (outside the Church there is no salvation).-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment