Many or most of the young people at the Latin Mass at the SSPX St. Catherine
of Siena chapel in Rome, on Sunday mornings, interpret Vatican Council II
irrationally to avoid the Anti Semitic charge, which could affect their career,
finances, marital relations etc. They need the rupture with Tradition, to be
politically correct with the Left and the liberals. So the Fellay-Kasper
interpretation of Vatican Council II, even though heretical and schismatic,
keeps life comfortable for them. It is good for business dealings, travel etc. If
they interpreted LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2 GS 22 etc, rationally, the
police will monitor their activity. For then they would be affirming the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) which affirmed the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), with no exceptions.
So publically they have the same values as Catholics who go for the
Novus Ordo Mass in Rome.
At the SSPX chapel they call themselves traditionalists but their
theology is the same at the liberals i.e. there is a rupture with Feeneyite
extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of
Pope Pius IX (ecumenism of return etc). There is a rupture since they interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, irrrationally. So fake exceptions are created for Feeneyite EENS and the Fourth Lateran Council.
They also interpret Vatican Council II (LG 8,14, 16 etc) irrationally and unethically. It is dishonesty for political reasons.
Neither the priest nor laity at the SSPX chapel is saying that they
affirm:-
1) The First Lateran Council (1215) on the dogma EENS and
2) Invisible cases of LG 8, LG 154, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc.
It is the same at churches with Mass in Italian, English or Filipina.
Both groups today, at the Latin and Novus Ordo Mass, could say that they affirm
1) Physically visible cases of LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, and GS 22 etc.
2) so they contradict the Fourth Lateran Council, on EENS, with no exceptions.
- Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment