Vatican Council II is traditional. So from where does Archbishop Corrado Lorefice, the Archbishop of Palermo, Italy, get his liberalism? When Fr. Alessandro M. Minutella is traditional, he is in line with Vatican Council II (rational/ traditional/Feeneyite).

 

Vatican Council II is traditional. So from where does Archbishop Corrado Lorefice, the Archbishop of Palermo, Italy, get his liberalism?

When Fr. Alessandro M. Minutella is traditional, he is in line with Vatican Council II (rational/ traditional/ Feeneyite).

Since the Council can only be rational and Feeneyite, the Archbishops excommunications based upon the liberalism of Vatican Council II (irrational) is political Left.  - Lionel Andrades

MAY 20, 2024

Vatican Council II rational supports Fr. Alessandro M. Minutella and not Bishop Corrado Lorefice of Palermo and Fr. Vaughn Treco and not Bishop Steven J.Lopes of the Anglican Ordinariate.

 

Vatican Council II ( rational) is political. The liberalism comes from the irrational premise. So when traditionalists are excommunicated in the name of Vatican Council II, it is political.

The Council interpreted rationally, supports the traditionalists and not the liberal left bishops.

Vatican Council II rational supports Fr. Alessandro M. Minutella and not Bishop Corrado Lorefice of Palermo and Fr. Vaughn Treco and not Bishop Steven J.Lopes of the Anglican Ordinariate.

 MAY 20, 2024

Definition : fake premise, inference and conclusion and the rational premise, inference and conclusion.

 

The common fake premise is – invisible people are physically visible in 2024.

The common fake inference is – there are physically visible non Catholics in 2024 saved outside the Catholic Church without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.

So the conclusion; the expected false conclusion is that Vatican Council II is a rupture with the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church. This is a New Theology in the Church. It says outside the Church there is known salvation.

All this reasoning I call Cushingism. This process of bad reasoning is common among the Cushingite popes, cardinals and bishops.

The rational premise is – invisible people are invisible in 2024. Lumen Gentium 16 etc refer to hypothetical cases only.

The rational inference is – there are no physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church in 2024 without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.

The traditional and rational conclusion is that Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. There are no objective exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence (1441), the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q,27Q ) and the rest of Tradition.We are back to the old theology of the Roman Missal.

I call this reasoning Feeneyism.

Feeneyism and Cushingism, for me, refer to a way of thinking and not the two well known persons, Cardinal Richard Cushing and Fr. Leonard Feeney. 

I interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance with Feeneyism. Cardinal Richard Cushing and the popes from Pius XII interpreted them with Cushingism.

I interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism ( invisible cases of Lumen Gentium 16 etc are invisible in 2024). Pope Paul VI and the popes who followed used Cushingism ( invisible cases of Lumen Gentium 14 are physically visible in 1965-2024).

In the 1920s and 1930's the Catholic Church was Feeneyite. Today it is Cushingite.

-Lionel Andrades

Mary, Mother of the Church

https://onepeterfive.com/treco-interview/ https://ordinariate.net/bishop-lopes

- Lionel Andrades