When the error was pointed out to them over a year back through this blog there was no response.There was no press statement from them even though it was posted on the Internet and copies sent to Albano and other traditionalists.Otherwise the Fraternita Sacerdotale San Pio X are quick to respond to reports.
Now there is silence. It is calculated silence.
Their position on Vatican Council II is now a political one without citations available from the text of the Council. It is clear that they have no doctrinal or factual support, for their position.They have used an irrational premise and inference, like the rest of the Church, to interpret Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents.
-Lionel Andrades
The Council of Trent, Mystici Corporis, Quanta Cura etc are interpreted by Albano, with a peculiar reasoning. They assume people in Heaven are visible on earth in the present times.Then it is inferred that these invisible cases are exceptions to the 'strict interpretation' of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So the Council of Trent, Mystici Corporis etc become a break with the traditional interpretation of the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. This is an error since there is no connection between the dogma on salvation and being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire.Theoretical cases cannot be exceptions. This was the original mistake made by the Italian Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani in 1949.
This connection was further made by the liberal theologians, the Jesuits in Boston and Cardinal Richard Cushing , the Archbishop of Boston. It was supported by the secular media and Pope Pius XII did not issue a correction. The SSPX Italy and Econe accept it until today.It is irrational. Yet this is how they interpret doctrine.
Lumen Gentium 16 and Unitatitis Redintigratio 3 for example , are neutral .If one assumes that they refer to persons visible, known seen in the flesh, who are in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water, then LG 16 and UR 3 become a break with the centuries old interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.(EENS)
If one assumes that these cases are invisible for us, and known only to God, then LG 16 and UR 3 do not contradict the traditional Feeneyite version of EENS. Vatican Council II is not a break with the Syllabus of Errors and the dogma.
The SSPX Italy has chosen the irrational alternative and so wrongly condemns Vatican Council II and Fr.Leonard Feeney of Boston, when the fault is with their interpretation. Their theology becomes fantasy since it is based on a factual error, that of being able to see people in Heaven.
Fr.Pierpaolo Petrucci in heresy? http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/frpierpaolo-petrucci-in-heresy.html
July 5, 2015
Fr.Pier Paolo Petrucci, the SSPX District Superior acts as if all is normal
Fr.Pier Paolo Petrucci, the SSPX District Superior acts as if all is normal
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/frpier-paolo-petrucci-sspx-district.html
Fr. Pier Paolo Petrucci, SSPX District Superior,Italy keeps silent over this issue for over a year : no clarification http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/06/fr-pier-paolo-petrucci-sspx-district.html
JUNE 29, 2015 Fr. Pier Paolo Petrucci, SSPX District Superior,Italy keeps silent over this issue for over a year : no clarification
FEBRUARY 5, 2014
If Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct or wrong, still imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3) and the baptism of desire are not explicit for us : no clarification still from SSPX Italy http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/02/if-frleonard-feeney-was-correct-or.html
Bishop Fellay has said that doctrinal questions must be clarified. SSPX USA should clarify this issue. Did Marchetti make an objective error?
http://eucharistandmission. blogspot.it/2015/02/bishop- fellay-has-said-that- doctrinal.html
February 3, 2015
blogspot.it/2015/02/this-is- error-from-pontificate-of- pope.html
February 3, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment