Cantarella, a traditionalist has been the only person who has understood me all these years and has expressed herself well on traditionalists forums.Here are some excellent observations of Cantarella I just stumbled upon, while hoping to find a photo on Cushingism.
I notice that the pro-SSPX Administrator of the blog says that he is going to hide her views.He of course banned me a few years back since I contradicted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.He could not understand the difference between Feeneyism and Cushingism as a philosophy and theology.He could not see how there was an objective mistake made in the Letter of the Holy Office, which violates the Principle of Non Contradiction and it was made magisterial by the liberals and Masons.Cantarella immediately understood this some four or five years back.She straight away had an insight into it.
-Lionel Andrades
« on: August 23, 2014
All the Cushingites believe in "subsistence" ecclesiology.
What are Cushingites?
+Richard
Cushing was the Archbishop of Boston during the controversy of the
Saint Benedict Center. Here is some information about him: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Cushing
Cushing
by the 1960's was an ecumenist who openly prayed with Protestants.
Some on this forum who deny Catholic teaching on Baptism of Desire and
Baptism of Blood use the term "Cushingite" to describe those of us who
defend the Catholic teaching.
Those of us who defend the
Catholic teaching are not supporters of Cusihing or his ecumenical
ideas, and we also know that Cushing is a sideshow, as it was was
Cushing, but the Holy Office in a letter approved by Pope Pius XII that
corrected the doctrinal error of the Feeneyites.
They have been
corrected about the fact that using this term to describe us is a
dishonest tactic, but continue to so. Let the readers who can see this
clearly decide.
________________________________________
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2014
Cushinghites are people that
share the modernist error of liberal Richard Cushing.
Cushinguites say
that there can be known souls saved in invincible ignorance or
baptism
of desire, contradicting the ex cathedra thrice defined Extra Ecclesiam
Nulla Salus dogma that says that only Catholics go to Heaven.
By
saying that everyone need not enter the Catholic Church for salvation
because there are some that can be saved in false religions, (a Jew can
be
saved as a Jew, a Muslim as a Muslim, a Hindu as a Hindu, without
converting explicitly to Catholicism) the Cushinguites throw out the
window Cantate Domino, Florence, Trent, and even Vatican
Council II (Ad
Gentes 7)!.
If
anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary
for baptism
and thus twists into some metaphor the words
of our Lord Jesus Christ"
Unless a man be born again of
water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let
him be anathema.
_______________
« Reply #4 on: August 23,
2014, 11:23:39 PM »
0
0
That is irrelevant.
Cushingism is the name of the error
that is professed by everyone
that believes there are known exceptions
to Extra Ecclesiam Nulla
Salus (this is, that there are known souls that
are saved via implicit
desire without even an explicit belief in the
Christian truths). They
assume this is a reality, a known exception, as
we could ever see
the dead, forgetting that God Himself has revealed only ONE
BAPTISM. There is only one baptism and that of water that we
humans know of.
The conciliar Popes have all been cushinguites.
If a person
believes that non - Catholics can be saved, then that person
has succumbed to the Cushingite error which contradicts
EENS, was
carried over to Vatican II Council,
and has not been corrected yet.
Cushingism
leads to the error of believing that BOD and
invincible ignorance are
actually de fide, instead of
hypothetical, and it degenerates without
fail in
universalism and indifferentism, which ends up
in the Prayer at
Assisi.
That is what is meant by the general adjective of
"cushingite".
________________________________
« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2014, 12:23:41 AM »
0
0
Cushinghites
are people that share the modernist error
of liberal Richard Cushing.
Cushinguites say that there
can be known souls saved in invincible
ignorance or
baptism of desire, contradicting the ex cathedra
thrice
defined Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus dogma
that says that only Catholics
go to Heaven.
By saying that everyone need not enter the
Catholic Church for salvation because there
are some that can be saved
in false religions,
(a Jew can be saved as a Jew, a Muslim as a Muslim,
a
Hindu as a Hindu, without converting explicitly to
Catholicism) the
Cushinguites throw out the window
Cantate Domino, Florence, Trent, and
even
Vatican Council II (Ad Gentes 7)!.
« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2014, 12:23:41 AM »
0
0
Cushinghites
are people that share the modernist error of liberal Richard Cushing.
Cushinguites say that there can be known souls saved in invincible
ignorance or baptism of desire, contradicting the ex cathedra thrice
defined Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus dogma that says that only Catholics
go to Heaven.
By saying that everyone need not enter the
Catholic Church for salvation because there are some that can be saved
in false religions, (a Jew can be saved as a Jew, a Muslim as a Muslim, a
Hindu as a Hindu, without converting explicitly to Catholicism) the
Cushinguites throw out the window Cantate Domino, Florence, Trent, and
even Vatican Council II (Ad Gentes 7)!.
Ambrose:
That's not what the Holy Office taught.
_________________________________
The
letter of 1949 claims that there are known exceptions
to the EENS dogma which has been defined by three
Church Councils. The known exceptions are supposed
to be the souls who die "invincible ignorant" of the True
Faith and are saved through subjective and ambiguous
"implicit desire
via last minute BOD".
This letter is also a straighforward and
blant rejection
of the Nicene Creed "I believe in one baptism for the
forgiveness of sin" which refers to water Baptism only,
the sacrament
that has been revealed by God Himself.
It is being implied in this
letter that there are three or
more known baptisms:water, desire, blood
etc.
Unfortunately, Vatican II curia - Novus Ordo,
sedevacantists such
as CMRI, and even SSPX
priests such as Fr.Francois Laisney are guilty of
the same faulty reasoning.
As said before, it seems that that
the "traditionalists"
can only point out to the errors in Vatican II but
cannot really provide an alternative since they act
unaware of the
Cushing Heresy (invincible ignorance
-> denial of EENS) which is the
cause of those
errors.
The EENS dogma (as all Catholic dogmas)
is to
be understood as solemnly declared, professed,
and taught since
the creation of the
Church, without any change of meaning.
Pope
Pius IX, Vatican Council, Session 3,
Chapter 4, #14,ex cathedra:
"Hence, too, that
meaning of the sacred dogmas is ever to be
maintained
which has once been declared by
Holy Mother Church, and there must never
be
any abandonment of this sense under the pretext
or in the name of a
more profound
understanding."
Pope
Pius IX, Vatican Council, Session
3, Canon 4, ex cathedra:
"If anyone
says that it is possible that at
some time, given theadvancement of
knowledge, a sense may be assigned to the
dogmas propounded by the
church which
is different from that which the church has
understood and
understands: let him be anathema."
Cushinguism
is an actual ERROR based on the modernist
new doctrine of salvation
made in the USA. The
Archbishop of Boston and the liberal Jesuits there
gave us the novel concept of an exceptional way of
salvation: through
"invincible ignorance" while in "false
religion". This objective error
was spread in the Catholic
Church and carried over Vatican II. It is the
main basis
for liberalism and dissent in the Church.
If
anyone says that true and natural water is not
necessary for baptism
and thus twists into some
metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ"
Unless a man be born again of water and the
Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let
him be anathema.
https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=4007409004435288027#editor/target=post;postID=7271516895868257910
https://www.cathinfo.com/index.php?pretty;board=28;topic=33451.0
No comments:
Post a Comment