The Congregation for the Laity and
the Congregation for the Evangelisation of Peoples is approved by the Left, so
the communities in Catanzaro, South Italy suppressed , could have got have got into trouble by rejecting Vatican Council II, interpreted with the fake premise, and gone back to Tradition ( Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc). This is even though they attend Holy Mass in Italian and not Latin.
So the two lay communities, including
consecrated women, would not be politically correct with the Left which approves the false premise, inference and conclusion in the
interpretation of Magisterial documents.So new salvation doctrines have been created which are approved by the
bishops, cardinals and Pope Francis.
The whole issue has been kept secret in
the Church and there are no details given out on the specific errors of the
communities, so that they could be avoided in future. An issue seems the New Evangelisation based upon the false premise.
Similarly a Charismatic group in Malta
was abruptly suppressed some months back, with no details
made in public.It could be assumed that their theology was not liberal and so
not legally correct with the Left.
Come to think of it, if they were really
inspired by the Holy Spirit, they would
not use the fake premise, inference and conclusion of Pope Francis and Pope Benedict.
The New Theology has been approved by
the ecclesiastics but it is not inspired by the Holy Spirit, since it is built
on a fake premise.So it cannot be Magisterial.The popes, since Pius
XII have over looked the error.
So the suppression of the two
communities of Catanzero,with details not given out, could be a sign of their
authenticity, as when for example, Padre Pio was silenced by the ecclesiastics,
officially.
The Decree against the lay communities,
approved by Pope Francis and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith(CDF),indicates, that all future approved, lay and religious communities,
will have to be Christocentric and not ecclesiocentric. They will have to break
with Catholic Tradition on faith and morals. They have to be anti-Christ, as
Christ and His Church was known to the Magisterium over the centuries.
Interestingly, the lay communities
suppressed accepted Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office(CDF)
1949, just like the ecclesiastics, liberals and traditionalists. The
theology of Vatican Council II is based upon the fake premise of the LOHO,
which creates the New Theology, used by even the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) and the
sedevancantists (CMRI,MHFM etc).This is unknown to them.So in a confused way
Bishop Bernard Fellay could say that the SSPX accepts 90% of Vatican Council II
and at the other times that the SSPX rejects the Council.No one would address
the issue of the fake premise which creates ‘the heremeneutic of rupture’ with
Tradition(Syllabus of Errors etc).
If the SSPX, FSSP and Franciscans of the
Immaculate address the issue of the fake premise and so reject the New
Theology, probably they too would be suppressed like the Movimento Apostolico
and Maria Madre della Redenzione.-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment