With Vatican Council II interpreted with
the Rational Premise the German Catholic ecclesiastics come back to the 16th century Church on a
faith-issue : exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. They also will have
to return to the morals of that time, like homosexual unions being a sin, which
are not contradicted by Vatican Council II( rational ).Cardinal Marx can no
more say that the Council is a break with Tradition.All the books, articles and
theological journals in Germany wrongly interpreted the Council with the False
Premise.
They have to agree with Bishop
Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall who said that there are
no explicit cases of the baptism of desire(BOD) and being saved in invincible
ignorance(I.I).There are no explicit and literally-known cases of a non
Catholic saved with St. Thomas Aquinas’ implicit baptism of desire.This is a
given. It is something obvious.Even the German bishops will agree.
So when the German ecclesiastics, priests and lay people admit this in public, they also would be saying that hypothetical cases of LG 14( case of the catechumen) are not a practical break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) as it was known to the saints and martyrs in Germany over the centuries.In principle, LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc are always theoretical and speculative only in 2021.So there is nothing in the text of the Council to contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( an ecumenism of return) and the Catechism of Pope Pius X, 24Q,27Q( other religions are not paths to salvation and their members need to convert into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell).So when it is a return to Tradition on Catholic faith it is also a return to Tardition on Catholic morals.There is nothing in the Council-text which contradicts traditional morals.
SYNODAL PATH HAS NOT SUPPORT IN VATICAN COUNCIL II
The German Synodal Path has no
support in Vatican Council II on faith and morals.The Council cannot be blamed
in general. It has a Specific Error which can be avoided.Then there is a return
to Tradition with no new theology.
Bishop Athanasius Schnedier and Dr.
Taylor Marshall have found that Specific Error in Vatican Council II.They know
what causes the break with Tradition.It is the False Premise.This was not known
to the German cardinals and bishops.The Council Fathers( Rahner, Ratzinger etc)
used the False Premise of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop
of Boston(LOHO) and Pope Paul VI did not correct the mistake.
Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member, but it is necessary that at least he be united to her by desire and longing.- Letter of the Holy Office 1949
Why is it not necessary to be a member when for centuries the dogma EENS has said that it was necessary ? Since the Letter assumes there are practical exceptions of being saved with the baptism of desire.But it was common sense for centuries that there were no objective cases of the catechumen being saved without the baptism of water and instead with only the desire.So what was invisible was projected as being visible.This was the False Premise. It gave birth to the New Theology which says outside the Church there is known salvation in the present times, so there are exceptions to EENS etc.
UNETHICAL INTERPRETATION OF EENS
Why must Catholics in Germany choose the
unethical and dishonest interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS when a
rational and traditional alternative is there ? It is a mortal sin of faith to
change the understanding of the Creeds and the dogma EENS.
It is the premise which creates a
continuity or break with Tradition, irrespective if you are conservative or
liberal,a pope, cardinal or bishop.This was not known at the German
universities and seminaries. The books and articles were written with the False
Premise.
Now in Traditionis Custode, Pope Francis
chose the False and not Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and to
make it a condition to offer the Latin Mass.
For Pope Francis and the German bishops there are
exceptions for EENS, the Syllabus etc. So they imply that there are physically
visible exceptions to EENS etc in the present times.But invisible people cannot
be practical exceptions to the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church.It
is a fact of life that there are no physically visible examples of salvation
outside the Church in 2021.So now we have two interpretations of Vatican
Council II in Germany.One is with the False Premise ( invisible cases are
physically visible in the present times) and the other is with the Rational
Premise ( invisible cases are invisible).This is a fact that the Church in
Germany will have to acknowledge.It is a reality that the German episcopy has
to face.-Lionel Andrades
OCTOBER 5, 2021
In Germany the Catholics who support homosexual marriages could affirm Vatican Council II and interpret it with the Rational Premise and not the False Premise. Then they return to the faith-teachings of the 16th century.In the past homosexual unions were always mortal sins.
In Germany the Catholics who support homosexual marriages could affirm Vatican Council II and interpret it with the Rational Premise and not the False Premise. Then they return to the faith-teachings of the 16th century.In the past homosexual unions were always mortal sins.
With Vatican Council II interpreted rationally the German Catholics would be saying outside the Church there is no salvation( Ad Gentes 7) and there are no exceptions to AG 7 in hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc and neither are there any practical exceptions to AG 7 in Germany in 2021.
So the Catholic Church would be saying that all non Catholics are oriented to Hell without ‘faith and baptism’(AG 7). This is a faith teaching.
In the 16th century gay marriages were mortal sins of morals.This still is a moral teaching of the Catholic Church.Homosexual unions are sin.
The Church has not changed when Vatican Council II is interpreted with the Rational Premise.
Cardinal Marx justifies the German Synodal Way with a break with Tradition for him, when Vatican Council II is interpreted with the common false premise.With the Rational Premise he will return to 16th century Germany.-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment