It’s unethical by secular standards for Bishop Robert
Barron and Dr. Larry Chapp to use a False Premise to interpret Vatican Council
II. I affirm Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise. I avoid the False
Premise.
Bishop Barron interprets Vatican Council II with the
Fake Premise emerges a liberal and then holds a talk with Jordan Peterson.
For Bishop Barron Lumen Gentium 16 contradicts the
dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius
IX (ecumenism of return to the Church/ outside the Church no salvation). For me
it does not contradict these Magisterial Documents. Since they always refer to
hypothetical and invisible cases in the present times (2022).There are no known
cases of non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church. So there are no
practical exceptions for Tradition. (Catechism of Pope Pius X, Athanasius Creed
etc).
At the Los Angeles Catholic Conference they were all
in general, interpreting Vatican Council II with the False Premise and so was
Bishop Barron. So there was a fake and artificial rupture with Tradition. -Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment