Thursday, May 23, 2024

We do not have unity on doctrine even among conservative and traditionalist Catholics.

 

We do not have unity on doctrine even among conservative and traditionalist Catholics. When Archbishop Augustine di Noia o.p, Secretary of the Doctrine for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, officially and in public informed Brother Andre Marie micm, Prior of the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire,  to project the Catechism of the Catholic Church 847-848 (saved in invincible ignorance etc) as being exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Council of Florence 1441) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845,846) everyone should have pounced on him. They should have asked Di Noia for a correction. How can invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire be practical exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q, 27Q), the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX (ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church) and the Fourth Lateran Council 1215 on the dogma outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation ?  The mistake of Archbishop Di Noia and Bishop Libasci the bishop of Manchester in New Hampshire can still be read on the diocese website.- Lionel Andrades



 2024

Definition : fake premise, inference and conclusion and the rational premise, inference and conclusion.

 

The common fake premise is – invisible people are physically visible in 2024.

The common fake inference is – there are physically visible non Catholics in 2024 saved outside the Catholic Church without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.

So the conclusion; the expected false conclusion is that Vatican Council II is a rupture with the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church. This is a New Theology in the Church. It says outside the Church there is known salvation.

All this reasoning I call Cushingism. This process of bad reasoning is common among the Cushingite popes, cardinals and bishops.

The rational premise is – invisible people are invisible in 2024. Lumen Gentium 16 etc refer to hypothetical cases only.

The rational inference is – there are no physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church in 2024 without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.

The traditional and rational conclusion is that Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. There are no objective exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence (1441), the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q,27Q ) and the rest of Tradition.We are back to the old theology of the Roman Missal.

I call this reasoning Feeneyism.

Feeneyism and Cushingism, for me, refer to a way of thinking and not the two well known persons, Cardinal Richard Cushing and Fr. Leonard Feeney. 

I interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance with Feeneyism. Cardinal Richard Cushing and the popes from Pius XII interpreted them with Cushingism.

I interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism invisible cases of Lumen Gentium 16 etc are invisible in 2024). Pope Paul VI and the popes who followed used Cushingism ( invisible cases of Lumen Gentium 14 are physically visible in 1965-2024).

In the 1920s and 1930's the Catholic Church was Feeneyite. Today it is Cushingite.

-Lionel Andrades

Mary, Mother of the Church






















No comments: