The Vatican websites in general have a mistake in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.

The Vatican websites in general have a mistake in the interpretation  of Vatican Council II. There are articles and reports in different languages, which confuse what is invisible as being visible.They do not make the implicit-explicit,subjective-objective distinction. They use this mistake to reject Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). So there is a rupture with EENS as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.There is a rupture with the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.

There is big trouble ahead.

Every article on the Council, carries a mistake.The Council can be interpreted with hypothetical cases just being hypothetical and then there is no rupture with the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed and the Catechism of Pope Pius X on outside the Church there is no salvation.

Even though there are hundreds of reports on this issue on my blog Eucharist and Mission there is no comment from the Vatican Press Office.

The Vatican has to inform writers of new books on the Council, to not use an irrational premise to create a non traditional conclusion and then project the Council as a new revelation in the Church, or a development.

They also need to apologize for the existing mistake which caused so much confusion in the Church.

Hundreds of religious vocations were also lost after 1965  when Pope Paul VI interpreted  the Council irrationally, even though there was a rational choice.

-Lionel Andrades