Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters liberalism was based on an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.The National Catholic Reporter had two books reviewed, which interpreted Vatican Council II with the superficial and false reasoning.The books were authored by Paul Lakeland and Fr. Jared Wicks sj.

Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters liberalism was based on an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.The National Catholic Reporter  had two books reviewed, which interpreted Vatican Council II with the superficial and false reasoning.
 
The books were authored by Paul Lakeland and Fr. Jared Wicks sj.

Photos of mirage/illusion

 

There have been no reports or comments  on the NCR, or by Lakeland and Wicks, disagreeing with me. Since their errors was based on an objective fault.It  was not a theory or philosophy .We know that there are no physically visible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church for us human beings. So there are no 'physical bodies' in time and space, which could be examples of salvation outside the Church. So there are no visible exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) or EENS as it was interpreted by St. Francis Xavier, St. Robert Bellarmine and St. Ignatius of Loyola.But for Faggioli and Winters, Vatican Council II contradicts EENS. So there are visible and known exceptions to EENS. Otherwise how could the Council contradict the past ecclesiology and Feeneyite EENS? 
This was also the false reasoning of Wicks and Lakeland.
This is the common interpretation of Vatican Council II, which is the basis of the liberalism of Faggioli and Winters.However we are now aware of the error. So we can reject books and authors which make this error.

Interestingly Faggioli and Winters, have not written on this subject for some time now.-Lionel Andrades