MAY 18, 2021
Why should Catholics choose the progressivist and Lefebvrist interpretation of Vatican Council II with a false premise instead of mine without the fake premise ?
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/why-should-catholics-choose.html
MAY 17, 2021
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ? Pope Pius XII and the Holy Office(CDF) made an objective mistake. Pope Paul VI and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, made an objective error.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/why-should-catholics-choose-irrational.html
, MAY 17, 2021
Only the Catholic Church -Solamente la Chiesa Cattolica
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/only-catholic-church-solamente-la.html
JULY 19, 2017
Catholic theocracy- Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) essentialhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/repost-catholic-theocracy-vatican.html
MAY 4, 2015
Questions and Answers : Evangelizing with Vatican Council II
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/repost-evangelizing-with-vatican.html
MAY 17, 2021
In what way are you different from every one else?
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/in-what-way-are-you-different-from.html
MAY 17, 2021
I affirm Vatican Council II. It is my primary reference in the support of Tradition.I affirm Vatican Council II but I do not interpret it like the traditionalists or progressivists
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/i-affirm-vatican-council-ii-it-is-my.html
JUNE 28, 2019
Catholics today can attend the Novus Ordo Mass , be a member of the Charismatic Renewal, Focolares or Neo Cathechumenal Way, interpret Magisterial documents with the red not being an exception to the blue and he or she would be a traditionalist on Catholic doctrinehttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/repost-catholics-today-can-attend-novus.html
MAY 17, 2021
Who has taught you all this ?
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/who-has-taught-you-all-this.html
MAY 17, 2021
Vatican Council II according to the blog Eucharistandmission
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/vatican-council-ii-according-to-blog.html
MAY 17, 2021
We now know precisely how the hermeneutic of rupture or continuity with Tradition is created with Vatican Council II.So we can choose to interpret the Council not like Bishop Robert Barron and Massimo Faggioli or Archbishop Lefebvre, but, the blog EucharistandMission, Lionel's blog
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/we-now-know-precisely-how-hermeneutic.html
MAY 16, 2021
They don't know theology
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/they-dont-know-theology.html
MAY 16, 2021
In the registered municipalities of Rome, where there is a population of over 15,000 people, the parishioners could be asked to vote only for the political parties Forza Nuova, Militia Christi etc which affirm in public that Christ is King
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/in-registered-municipalities-of-rome.html
MAY 16, 2021
We now know how to switch the hermeneutic of continuity or rupture, on or off, at will.We have found the secret.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/we-now-know-how-to-switch-hermeneutic.html
MAY 16, 2021
Bishop Robert Barron is as obsolete as Archbishop Lefebvre on Vatican Council II. This is not observed by Massimo Faggioli whose books on the Council were written with the same false premise, inference and rational conclusion, common among the liberals and Lefebvrists
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/bishop-robert-barron-is-as-obsolete-as.html
MAY 15, 2021
Doctrinal issues for the Comitato dell Immacolata at Casalotti, Boccea Rome
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/these-are-doctrinal-issues-which-need.html
MAY 15, 2021
Catholic school students should not interpret Magisterial documents ( Vatican Council II, Catechisms and Creeds , EENS etc) with an irrational premise, inference and non traditional conclusion and consider this the teaching of the Holy Spirit
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/catholic-school-students-should-not.html
MAY 12, 2021
Douglas Bushman ( Augustine Institute, Colorado ) wrote a political piece on Vatican Council II recently for The Catholic World Report. He does not deny that he used a false premise, inference and conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II and so falsely projected the Council as a rupture with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) which he cannot support
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/douglas-bushman-augustine-institute.html
MAY 7, 2021
There is no denial from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.They agree with me!
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/there-is-no-denial-from-congregation.html
MAY 9, 2021
When Catholics use the blue passages, the Great Commission has no exceptions, EENS has no exceptions,Vatican Council II(AG 7) has no exceptions and the Catechism of the Catholic Church( 846-Outside the Church No Salvation and 1257 The Necessity of Baptism) has no exceptions
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/when-catholics-use-blue-passages-great.html
_______
_______
All the popes before Pius XII supported the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with BOD, BOB and I.I not referring to personally known non Catholics. So they were not exceptions to EENS. The popes could affirm EENS and BOD,BOB and I.I it was not either-or. They did not have to choose.Vatican Council II can be interpreted in the same way-in harmony with the popes and saints over the centuries on EENS
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/06/all-popes-since-pius-xii-supported.html
JUNE 17, 2019
The error was accepted by Archbishop Lefebvre, Cardinal Ottaviani, Michael Davies and the traditionalists of their time,for whom BOD, BOB and I.I were exceptions to EENS. Then they made the same mistake in their interpretation of Vatican Council II. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc were exceptions to EENS for them. The error can be read on line in one of the Letters to Friends and Benefactors written by Bishop Bernard Fellay.For him UR 3 was an exception to EENS
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/06/the-error-was-accepted-by-archbishop.html
JUNE 15, 2019
Lega members need to contact Cardinal Luiz Ladaria and write to Fr. Antonio Spadero: stop teaching the New Theology which is based upon a falsehood
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/06/lega-members-need-to-contact-cardinal.html
JUNE 12, 2019
Westminster offers new programs which re-interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and reject the traditional understanding of Mission and salvation
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/06/westminister-offers-new-programs-which.html
JUNE 11, 2019
The Church says that when I meet a non Catholic I know he or she is oriented to Hell
JUNE 11, 2019
For me the present two popes and the CDF are heretical and irrational. They violate the Principle of Non Contradiction. It is the same error made my the traditionalists and sedevacantists in the interpretation of Vatican Council IIhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/06/for-me-the-present-two-popes-and-cdf.html
An academic degree is being given by German theologians and the universities John Lateran and Regina Apostolorum, Rome to students who major in the writings of Pope Benedict, all interpreted with the false premise, inference and conclusion; the irrational red passages. This project is uethical and needs to be closed down. It is not Catholic
JUNE 10, 2019
CDF is heretical and irrational and the evidence is there on line___________________________
MAY 2, 2021
The Vatican Council II problem needs to be resolved by the Italian Education Ministry and the Vatican
The Italian Education Ministry needs to clarify that Vatican Council II can only be interpreted with the blue passages and not the red ones . LG 8,LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc can only be seen as hypothetical and theoretical in 2021. They are not practical examples of persons saved outside the Catholic Church.
What is subjective, speculative, theoretical and hypothetical cannot be taught to Catholic students as being the opposite i.e explicit, objective and practical.
It is dishonest to do this and yet it is being done through out Italy. The Vatican Council II problem needs to be resolved by the Vatican and the Italian Education Ministry.- Lionel Andrades
BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE
Fake premise
The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically visible cases in 1949-2021.
Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.They are examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
Fake conclusion
So they contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Pope Pius XII and the Holy Office(CDF) made an objective mistake.
BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE
Rational Premise
The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically invisible cases in 1949-2021
They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.They are not examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
Rational Conclusion
They do not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.They do not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.
__________
VATICAN COUNCIL II
Fake premise
Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium 14(Baptism of Desire), Lumen Gentium 16 (Invincible ignorance) etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.
Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.
Fake conclusion
Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Pope Paul VI and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, made an objective error.
VATICAN COUNCIL II
Rational Premise
Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium 14 and Lumen Gentium 16 in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.
Rational Conclusion
Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-L.A
______________________________________
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome,
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission
E-mail: lionelandrades10@ gmail.com
Tel:-
____________
https://www.miur.gov.it/
MAY 1, 2021
The German Catholic Bishops Conference and the German Ministry of Education, needs to clarify that Vatican Council II can only interpreted with the blue and passages and not the red ones. Every one must choose the rational option only
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/the-german-catholic-bishops-conference.html
MAY 1, 2021
Teachers of the Catholic religion, in public schools in Italy, use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and this is approved by the Italian Ministry of Education
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/teachers-of-catholic-religion-in-public.html
MAY 1, 2021
An academic degree is being given by German theologians and the universities John Lateran and Regina Apostolorum, Rome to students who major in the writings of Pope Benedict, all interpreted with the false premise, inference and conclusion; the irrational red passages. This project is uethical and needs to be closed down. It is not Catholic
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/an-academic-degree-is-being-given-by.html
MAY 13, 2021
Pope Francis had to close down the Franciscans of the Immaculate seminary and force the seminarians to study at the pontifical universities in Rome.There they had to interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms with the false premise, inference and non traditional conclusion.They had to accept this leftist, political interpretation of the Council .Now they teach it to others
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/pope-francis-had-to-close-down.html
No comments:
Post a Comment