CDF is heretical and irrational and the evidence is there on line

Michael Voris went to the St.Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA and the message was LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc  in Vatican Council II are not exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).He also would tell Fr. Jonathan Morrris l.c,a few years back, that there are no exceptions to EENS.But the Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Archbishops Morandi and Di Noia, in their correspondence with Brother Andre Marie MICM, consider the Catechism of the Catholic Church(n.847-848 on invincible ignorance) contradicting 16th century EENS.There are exceptions for them.

So Michael Voris and the St. Benedict Center would be in heresy for the CDF. Since the CDF, like the liberal theologians, since Pope Pius XII, consider BOD, BOB and I.I 1 as being exceptions to EENS.This is Tradition for the CDF and the present two popes.

Tradition, for the CDF,  is accepting that BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS.This is the norm. Tradition for the CDF is not accepting that BOD, BOB and I.I is in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS and not in contradiction.

Before Pope Pius XII the Church knew that hypothetical cases are just hypothetical.There was no confusion on the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I).

So assuming Michael Voris is considered a heretic by the new CDF Dicastery what would he say ?

He could say that the Vatican is not allowing him to affirm his religion; his Catholic beliefs.Since the CDF irrationally interprets Vatican Council II and EENS and expects him to do the same. They want a non traditional,innovative interpretation and conclusion.

Voris does not repeat the irrationality the CDF.It is the same with the SBC.

Invisible cases in 2019, referenced in LG 9, LG 16, UR 3, CCC 847-848 cannot be exceptions to the strict and traditional interpretation of EENS.This is false reasoning.It  is not Catholic. Michael Voris is not obliged to follow it.Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, USA,needs to affirm Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents in harmony with centuries-old interpretation of EENS- to be Catholic.

The CDF and Bishop Libasci cannot imply that the past popes and saints are not Catholic any more.

Bishop Libasci must not be allowed to reject the Church Fathers, the medieval popes and the Church Councils on EENS, to create a new version of EENs - and then call himself a Catholic.This would be deceptive.

Similarly on moral issues, John Henry Weston, the Editor in Chief at LifeSitesNews, has produced videos on Pope Francis teaching heresy.A supporter of heresy is a heretic.

If Weston is not considered a Catholic by the CDF, he will have to show how the present ecclesiastics at the Vatican, have changed the teaching on morals- but also on faith and salvation.

Also on faith and salvation. Since the evidence for heresy on faith and salvation is there on the Internet.The proof is there in the Letter of the Holy Office(1949).The evidence is also there in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission and Vatican Council II itself.A false premise and inference was used to change traditional understanding on EENS and the proof is there in the text of Vatican Council II.It is there in black and white.The evidence is there on line.-Lionel Andrades

1

BOD(Baptism of Desire).

BOB(Baptism of Blood),

I.I ( Invincible ignorance)