Bishop Athanasius Schneider agrees with me. Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez are in heresy and schism. There is no denial from the Italian Bishops Conference (CEI) and the US Bishops Conference (USCCB), the Vicar General and the Auxiliary bishops of Rome. There is no comment from the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Heart, Vatican.
This charge is made against them since they interpret
Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church with an irrational
premise to produce a heretical and schismatic conclusion. They do the same with
the Creeds and Catechisms.
There are no literal cases of the baptism of desire
said Bishop Schneider but for the DDF there are literal cases of the baptism of
desire otherwise the DDF would be affirming Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla
salus.
No one from the DDF will comment on this subject
otherwise they will be exposed.
So the trial for Archbishop Vigano, as expected, will
be held in secret. It will be private and he will be absent.
Similar trials will be held for the SSPX bishops and
Superior General and laymen Roberto dei Mattei, Taylor Marshall and Peter
Kwasniewski. Since they do not accept Vatican Council II (irrational).- Lionel Andrades
JUNE 26, 2024
Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez are in schism on Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and other Magisterial Documents, when they use the irrational and not rational premise, to produce a break with Tradition (EENS etc). There is no denial from Bishop Athanasius Schneider. He agrees with me.
Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez are in schism on Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and other Magisterial Documents, when they use the irrational and not rational premise, to produce a break with Tradition (EENS etc). There is no denial from Bishop Athanasius Schneider. He agrees with me.
In an interview Dr. Taylor Marshall he has said that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire. Marshall agreed with him. He confirmed that there are no explicit cases of Aquinas implicit baptism of desire.
But Bishop Schneider continues to interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as explicit cases, known people saved outside the Catholic Church in 1965-2024. Marshall does the same. This is the irrational interpretation of Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez. They confuse invisible cases of LG 14 (baptism of desire) as being visible exceptions for 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). They are all, Archbishop Carlo Vigano, included, confusing invisible cases as being visible people, in the present times. Then they conclude that the Council is a break with Tradition. Vigano rejects this interpretation and Fernandez and the liberals accept it. Both groups are in the same theological ship which does not have a rudder.
I too reject Vatican Council II (irrational) as does Vigano but I accept Vatican Council II (rational). The Council can only be interpreted honestly. We must not confuse LG 8 etc as being visible exceptions for Tradition (Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors. etc).
Fernandez is interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally like President Biden, the U.S State Department and the U.S Secretary of Education.There is no denial from the Rector of the Pontifical North American University, Rome and the American Rector of the Dominican University of St. Thomas Aquinas, Rome. President Biden and the U. S Administration are unethical.
There is now no denial also from the Paulist Fathers in Rome. Cardinal Fernandez and Pope Francis interpret the Council irrationally and thrust this dishonest version of the Council upon Archbishop Vigano, with the threats of excommunication and schism.It is Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez who really have made an objective error in public, which can be verified by anyone. - Lionel Andrades
JUNE 25, 2024
Bishop Athanasius Schneider should point out that it is Cardinal Victor Fernandez and Pope Francis who interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally and so are in schism
Bishop Athanasius Schneider is not honest when he says that Archbishop Vigano should not be excommunicated and does not speak the complete truth. Instead he should point out that it is Cardinal Victor Fernandez and Pope Francis who interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally and so are in schism.He has issued a statement posted on Gloria TV.
It is Pope Francis who needs to interpret Vatican Council II rationally; this is the only option he has.
It is those who do not accept Vatican Council II, rational, who are in schism and should be excommunicated, if they do not choose the rational and ethical option.
Bishop Schneider is sadly looking after his own status and does not want to affirm Vatican Council II rational and so affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, like the St. Benedict Centers, traditionalists in the diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire and Worcester, Mass, USA. He does not want to be called a Feeneyite. So he is interpreting the Council dishonestly like the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.
Similarly Mons. Giles Wach Prior General of the Institute of Christ the King, offers the Latin Mass while interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally. So the Council is a break with Tradition and the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal. He does not announce that the New Missal is flawed since it is based upon Vatican Council II, irrational.
Why must they all expect Archbishop Vigano to interpret LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, irrationally like Pope Francis and Bishop Schneider . Why should Catholics interpret the Council II, irrationally. With the rational interpretation there is no more liberalism in the Church.
If Tom Sawyer s.j editor of the magazine America and John Henry Westen,editor of Life Site News interpret Vatican Council II, rationally, they would be affirming the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the old theology, whether they like it or not.
Then the liberalism of Cardinal Fernandez will be obsolete. He will be in heresy and schism and will not be able to justify his liberalism with Vatican Council II, rational.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment