Thursday, July 11, 2024

It is in the interest of Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano to inform the French Catholics about Vatican Council II rational and irrational. Since he can use this information for his defense in the trial. During the appeal-time, he can also present this information on social media in his defense.

 

It is in the interest of Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano to inform the French Catholics about Vatican Council II rational and irrational. Since he can use this information for his defense in the trial. During the appeal-time, he can also present this information on social media in his defense.

1. It is obligatory for all popes, cardinals and bishops to interpret Vatican Council II only rationally and not irrationally. Presently Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez interpret the Council irrationally, to produce a break with Tradition. This is dishonest. The irrational premise and inference produce the first class heresy and schism, which has spread through the whole Church.

2. The pope is only Magisterial when he interprets Vatican Council II and the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms rationally. How can the Holy Spirit teach Catholics to interpret rationally and so as a break with the Magisterium of the past? With Vatican Council II, rational, he would be in harmony with the popes over the centuries who interpreted the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms only rationally.

3. Pope Francis as the pope is obliged to interpret Vatican Council II rationally only and so pull down Amoris Laetitia, Traditionis Custode, Fiducia Supplicans etc. Since he issued these papal documents based upon Vatican Council II irrational and so liberal. He needs to return to traditional faith, morals and mission. Since this is the only option he has with Vatican Council II, rational.

Archbishop Vigano can make all this known on his website. The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith can appoint a lawyer as before. He will complete the formalities. The lawyer must discuss Vatican Council II rationally and not irrationally. The rational interpretation is a discovery over some 15 years. This was not known in 1965 by even Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.  – Lionel Andrades

Archbishop Vigano could help the French people know about Vatican Council II rational and irrational. It would also help in his appeal at the trial

 

It is in the interest of Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano to inform the French Catholics about Vatican Council II rational and irrational. Since he can use this information for his defense in the trial. During the appeal-time, he can also present this information on social media in his defense.

1. It is obligatory for all popes, cardinals and bishops to interpret Vatican Council II only rationally and not irrationally. Presently Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez interpret the Council irrationally, to produce a break with Tradition. This is dishonest. The irrational premise and inference produce the first class heresy and schism, which has spread through the whole Church. This point must be brought up at the trial.

2. The pope is only Magisterial when he interprets Vatican Council II and the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms rationally. 

How can the Holy Spirit teach Catholics to interpret rationally and so as a break with the Magisterium of the past? 

With Vatican Council II, rational, he would be in harmony with the popes over the centuries who interpreted the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms only rationally.

At the trial it must be pointed out that when the pope is Magisterial on Church Documents he can accept the traditional pope.

3. Pope Francis as the pope is obliged to interpret Vatican Council II rationally only and so pull down Amoris Laetitia, Traditionis Custode, Fiducia Supplicans etc. He has issued these papal documents based upon Vatican Council II irrational and so liberal. He needs to return to traditional faith, morals and mission. Since this is the only option he has with Vatican Council II, rational. Then he can be acceptable as a pope .

Archbishop Vigano can make all these points  known on his website. It will also be made known to Catholics at large. 

The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith can appoint a lawyer as before. He will complete the formalities. The lawyer must discuss Vatican Council II rationally and not irrationally. Since it decides if Catholics can accept Pope Francis and the pope. The pope will also be in communion with the popes over the ages on doctrine and theology.So Catholics can be in communion with Pope Francis, Vatican Council II ( rational) and the Magisterium over the centuries. They can also do away with the liberal Church Documents and 'the reforms' based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally by confusing what is invisible as being visible.

Lumen Gentium 16 ( being saved in invincible ignorance) is always hypothetical. LG 16 refers to an invisible person in 2024 and so is not a practical exceptions for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). Things have changed in the Catholic Church.

 The rational interpretation is a discovery over some 15 years.The details can be read on this blog Eucharist and Mission ( Lionel's blog). This was not known in 1965 by even Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.  – Lionel Andrades

JULY 11, 2024

The cardinals and archbishop’s in France are responsible for the leftist elections victory.

 


The political Left won the elections in Francis since the Catholic population was not told that the mainstream Church was in heresy and schism, for interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally- the result was a  Church which was liberal and not traditional and so not supporting the right wing political parties.

If the Catholic Church was traditional – based upon Vatican Council II rational, then Catholics could affirm Magisterially, that outside the Church there is no salvation( AG 7, CCC 845,846 etc) and proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political activity, with the separation of the Church and the Leftist state and the non separation of the Church and the Catholic State.

Now the people follow Vatican Council II irrational and so are enslaved to leftist teachings, like the separation of Church and State.

The cardinals and archbishop’s in France are responsible for the leftist elections victory.

-       Lionel Andrades


David Parkes - A Story of Healing and Conversion

Fr Leon Pereira - I date my conversion to the day I first heard about Medugorje

The cardinals and archbishop’s in France are responsible for the leftist elections victory.

 




The political Left won the elections in Francis since the Catholic population was not told that the mainstream Church was in heresy and schism, for interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally- the result was a  Church which was liberal and not traditional and so not supporting the right wing political parties.

If the Catholic Church was traditional – based upon Vatican Council II rational, then Catholics could affirm Magisterially, that outside the Church there is no salvation( AG 7, CCC 845,846 etc) and proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political activity, with the separation of the Church and the Leftist state and the non separation of the Church and the Catholic State.

Now the people follow Vatican Council II irrational and so are enslaved to leftist teachings, like the separation of Church and State.

The cardinals and archbishop’s in France are responsible for the leftist elections victory.

-       Lionel Andrades