I
have been speaking to priests along the churches on Via Prenestina, Rome. They
all agree that LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, and GS 22 etc refer to
hypothetical cases only. They refer to invisible people in 2024. So the Council has a continuation with Tradition ; with the Athanasius Creed and the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus (with no exceptions). So for me, they are saying that
Cardinal Fernandez and Msgr. Kennedy of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the
Faith, Vatican, made an objective error in the trial for schism and the
excommunication of Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano. They interpreted LG
8,14,15,16 etc as being physically visible cases. So Vatican Council II was a
break with Tradition and they then brought liberalism into the Church, which
the Archbishop had to accept to be in communion with Pope Francis and to avoid
the schism charge.
I
have spoken to Fr. Paulo at the church Sant Agapito, Rome and Fr. Francesco and
Fr. Martin at the church San Leone 1, also along Via Prenestina. They agree
with me. LG 8 etc can only be hypothetical.
Now
if Cardinal Fernandez says the same then he affirms the past ecclesiocenrtrism.So he denies the Faith. This is schism.
Presently
the Oath against Modernism would have a different version of Msgr.Kennedy since
he confuses what is invisible as being visible and them makes liberal conclusions.
Archbishop Vigano has already said that the DDF is in heresy and schism. This has not been denied by the DDF. They have also not responded to my e-mails sent to the Vatican Press Office and that of Communications.
- Lionel Andrades
Posts
