It is in the interest of Archbishop
Carlo Maria Vigano to inform the French Catholics about Vatican Council II rational and irrational.
Since he can use this information for his defense in the trial. During the appeal-time,
he can also present this information on social media in his defense.
1. It is obligatory for all popes,
cardinals and bishops to interpret Vatican Council II only rationally and not
irrationally. Presently Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez interpret the
Council irrationally, to produce a break with Tradition. This is dishonest. The
irrational premise and inference produce the first class heresy and schism,
which has spread through the whole Church.
2. The pope is only Magisterial when he interprets Vatican Council II and the
Creeds, Councils and Catechisms rationally. How can the Holy Spirit teach
Catholics to interpret rationally and so as a break with the Magisterium of the
past? With Vatican Council II, rational, he would be in harmony with the popes
over the centuries who interpreted the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms only rationally.
3. Pope Francis as the pope is obliged to
interpret Vatican Council II rationally only
and so pull down Amoris Laetitia, Traditionis Custode, Fiducia Supplicans etc.
Since he issued these papal documents based upon Vatican Council II irrational and so liberal. He needs to return to
traditional faith, morals and mission. Since this is the only option he has
with Vatican Council II, rational.
Archbishop Vigano can make all this known
on his website. The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith can appoint a
lawyer as before. He will complete the formalities. The lawyer must discuss
Vatican Council II rationally and not irrationally. The rational interpretation
is a discovery over some 15 years. This was not known in 1965 by even
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. – Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment