Friday, August 2, 2024
So they made him an archbishop.
Archbishop John Joseph Kennedy, a priest from the liberal diocese of Dublin, Ireland had a difficult
job. He may have complained.
1.He
had to defend Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.
2.He
had to defend the liberalism, heresy and schism produced by Vatican Council II
interpreted irrationally.
3.He
had to accuse Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano of being in schism for not
accepting all this ‘thrash’ ; the liberalism which comes with the use of a fake
premise and inference to interpret the Council.
4.He
had to support Pope Francis who is not in communion with the popes of the past
before 1949 because he accepted the objective error in the 1949 Letter of the
Holy Office which was repeated in 1965 at Vatican Council II and he did not interpret LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, rationally.
5.He
had to support the excommunication of Archbishop Vigano who was going back to
Tradition and not accepting the new liberal doctrines which come from Vatican
Council II, interpreted irrationally and not rationally…
So they made him an archbishop.
-Lionel
Andrades
The Vigano trial and excommunication must remind us that the Holy Office/CDF/DDF had excommunicated Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops for not accepting Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally
The
Vigano trial and excommunication must remind us that the Holy Office/CDF/DDF
had excommunicated Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops for not
accepting Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.
The
Holy Office excommunicated Fr. Leonard Feeney in Boston for not interpreting
the baptism of desire irrationally.
They have now excommunicated Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, for not accepting the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II as does Pope Francis.
The irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Cushingite version of Vatican Council II allows Pope Francis to break communion with the popes over the centuries. They interpreted the baptism of desire rationally and so in a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, with no exceptions.
So the pope is not in communion with the popes before 1949 on the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus etc. This is heresy and schism. Since Vatican Council II, (with LG 8,14,15,16 etc), we now know, are invisible cases in 2024.
Invisible people cannot
be visible exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS and the Syllabus
of Errors (ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church), Catechism of Pope Pius
X (24 Q, 27Q).Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with this confusion and he wants Archbishop Vigano to do the same.- Lionel Andrades
If we interpret LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being hypothetical cases, then Pope Francis, and Cardinal Fernandez are in heresy and schism. Since they do not accept the Athanasius Creed etc which are then not contradiced by Vatican Council II, LG 8 etc being only htypothetical
If
we interpret LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being hypothetical cases,
then Pope Francis, and Cardinal Fernandez are in heresy and schism. Since they do
not accept the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the
Syllabus of Error, which are not contradicted by Vatican Council II, which has invisible
and hypothetical cases of LG 8 etc.
- Lionel Andrades
Posts
