We know what the Siin Fein position on Palestine is but what is their
stand on Vatican Council II rational and irrational? This religious issue is
now political. Are their members allowed to intentionally interpret Vatican
Council II irrationally and so dishonestly to please the Zionists?
King Charles at his coronation only pledged to support Protestant
England. Sectarian. Fundamentalist? Fascist?There was no mention of
Catholicism. England will maintain its Protestant and not Catholic identity.King
Charles, like his father, is also the head of Scottish Masonry.He protects them.
Westminster was once Catholic. The king and queen of England was
Catholic.Before Henry VIII and Martin Luther, England was Catholic and the
universal Church believed in the Eucharist according to the Apostles and the
Catholic Church Fathers,
Could Sein Fein ask that Catholic churches be returned to the Catholic Church?
This is a problem closer to home than that of the Palestinians.
THE BIBLE
The Bible used by the Protestants originated with the Catholic Church. The
Catholic Church approved the manuscripts which make up the Bible. Also the
liturgy used by the Protestants, originated with the Catholic Church. It comes
from the time of Constantine. The Protestant concept of the Holy Trinity comes from a church Council of the Catholic Church.
But in Britain, Catholics are not allowed to proclaim their Faith because
of the Jewish Left privations.It is the same in Rome.
The Irish seminaries in Rome and the English seminaries in Britain do not
accept Irish students to the religious life, if they interpret Vatican Council
II, rationally and so affirm Tradition. It is the same at the pontifical universities
and seminaries in Rome. It is the same with teachers and professors. Catholic professors are
approved by the bishop. Only those professors are approved who interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. This is political Left issue.
May be Sinn Fein could move in.
-Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 11, 2024
New political and religious opening for Sinn Fein
Since Vatican Council II (rational) supports the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) upon which was based the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political legislation, Sinn Fein can now have a Catholic government supported by the Archdiocese of Dublin and the Catholic Church in general.
Vatican Council II is no more liberal on Protestantism and other religions since there is nothing in the Council-text to contradict the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors. LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II are always invisible and not visible cases, in our human reality.
Sinn Fehn, which is the largest political party in Ireland, can work towards the non separation of Church and State, to save the maximum souls from going to Hell. Outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation (CCC 845,846).
They must oppose the Archdiocese of Dublin when they intentionally interpret Vatican Council II, irrationally,like the Masons. They then claim that the Council is ‘a new revelation ‘and ‘a new revolution’ in the Church. The archbishop deceptively confuses what is invisible as being visible and then supports the nontraditional conclusion. Faith, morals, mission etc are changed with this deception.
We are back to the traditional moral teachings of the Church of St. Alphonsus Liguori, which are not contradicted by Vatican Council II.
Cardinal Vincent Nichols in England chooses the irrational, Zionist interpretation of Vatican Council II which must be corrected by Sinn Fein.
It has to be clear that Judaism and Islamism are not paths to salvation.This is the teaching of the Catholic Church according to Magisterial Documents, including Vatican Council II, interpreted rationally. This is not just a political and ideological view.
So the migrants must know what the Church teaches. The Church is saying non Catholic migrants are going to Hell unless they enter the Catholic Church with ‘faith and baptism’ (AG 7).
Sinn Fehn rejects Vatican Council II,irrational ( LG 14 refers to physically visible cases in 2024) and not Vatican Council II, rational ( LG 16 refers to an invisible person in 2024).Morally, only Vatican Council II, rational can be chosen by all.
So the Catholic Church in Ireland and Sinn Fehn return to the ecclesiology of the times of the Papal States in Europe and the Irish missionaries in the Middle Ages. Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the times of St. Patrick and St. Isidore.- Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 10, 2024
With Vatican Council II interpreted rationally the theology and doctrines of the Catholic Church return to that of 1905 when Sinn Fein was founded in Ireland.
With Vatican Council II interpreted rationally the theology and doctrines of the Catholic Church return to that of 1905 when Sinn Fein was founded in Ireland. Sorca Clarke TD is the present Education spokesman for Sinn Fein and she should demand that the Irish Bishops Conference only interpret Vatican Council II honestly and so in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Catholic Tradition before 1947 is not contradicted by Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
Norma Foley of the political party Fianna Fail is the Minister for Education at Dublin. She needs to announce that LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only. They refer to invisible people in 2024. This will be enough to take the Catholic Church back to Tradition.
The Archbishop of Dublin interprets LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as referring to physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church in 1965-2024. So they become objective exceptions for the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the rest of Tradition as it was known to Sinn Fein in 1905 to 1949.
It means that the Catholic Church is today saying, officially, according to Magisterial Documents ( Creeds, Councils, Catechisms ) interpreted only rationally that the members of the Orange Order and Protestant and Masonic organizations need to enter the Catholic Church for salvation from Hell.- Lionel Andrades
https://www.sinnfein.ie/sorca-clarke
AUGUST 9, 2024
In Ireland at Catholic schools, during religion classes and for Confirmation and First Holy Communion classes children must be taught to interpret Church Documents rationally and honestly : Norma Foley is the Minister for Education in Ireland
Norma Foley is the Minister for Education in Ireland and she must know that there is a controversy on Vatican Council II. There are two versions of the Council. The Ministry of Education uses the irrational and dishonest one. It is the same with the Archdiocese of Dublin. Even the Archbishop-elect from Dublin, John Joseph Kennedy at the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, makes the same objective mistake.
In religious education in Ireland, students must be taught to interpret Vatican Council II only rationally i.e LG 8, 14,15,16,UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical cases only .They refer to physically invisible cases in Ireland in 2024. We cannot see or meet someone saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire. If any one was saved outside the Church as such, it could only be known to God.
So LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are not practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church) and the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q,27Q-outside the Church there is no salvation). An exception must exist. It must be visible in our human reality. Invisible people cannot be visible exceptions for Catholic Tradition.
So the Catholic Church would be saying today, as it did for centuries, that Mohammad died without 'faith and baptism'( Ad Gentes 7), outside the Church there is no salvation (CCC 845,846) and all need to be members of the Church to avoid Hell ( Council of Florence 1442) and that in Heaven there are only Catholics ( Ag 7, CCC 845,846, CDF, Notification of Fr. Jacques Dupuis sj, 2001 etc).
This is the official position of the Catholic Church in Dublin according to Magisterial Documetns ( Creeds, Councils, Catechisms, only when they are interpreted rationally i.e by not confusing what is invisible as being visble).
The Archbishop of Dublin confused what is invisible as being visble. So LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are objective examples of salvation in 1965-2024, visible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church. So not everyone needs to enter the Catholic Church for the Archbishop and Pope Francis. This was the error of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston with reference to Fr. Leonard Feeney (LOHO). The 1949 LOHO issued during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII, confused invisible cases of the baptism of desire as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
The excommunication of Fr. Leonard Feeney was lifted by Pope Paul VI. The priest chose to recite the Athanasius Creed which says all need to enter the Catholc Church Church for eternal salvation from Hell.He died a faithful member of the Catholic Church with a bishop present for his funeral Mass.
The Archdiocese offices in Dublin have been contacted via e-mail but they refuse to comment. It is the same with the Vatican.
The Ministry of Education in Dublin, must ask the Archdiocese to be ethical on Vatican Council II and the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms and to stop interpreting them irrationally.
Also at Catholic schools, during religion classes and for Confirmation and First Holy Communion classes children must be taught to interpret Church Documents rationally and honestly. - Lionel Andrades
https://www.fiannafail.ie/tds/norma-foley
https://www.gov.ie/en/organisation/department-of-education/
Posts
