When the Dominicans came to Dublin 800 years ago they
interpreted the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms rationally but today the
Archbishop of Dublin and Archbishop-elect Kennedy of the Dicastery for the
Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican interpret them irrationally and dishonestly. There
is no continuity with the past CDF/Holy Office before 1947. So the DDF was not eligible to conduct the
trial of Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano a traditionalist. The DDF does not
represent the Tradition of the Dominicans 800 years ago. Neither does the DDF
represent Vatican Council II interpreted rationally and so is not a rupture with
the Dominicans of the Middle Ages. - Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 6, 2024
When the Dominicans came to Dublin 800 years ago they interpreted the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms rationally but today the Archbishop of Dublin interprets them irrationally and dishonestly.
When the Dominicans came to Dublin 800 years ago they interpreted the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms rationally but today the Archbishop of Dublin interprets them irrationally and dishonestly.
Archbishop Farrell – Letter to the Order of Preachers on 800th anniversary
ARCHBISHOP DERMOT FARRELL
LETTER TO THE ORDER OF PREACHERS
ON THE 800TH ANNIVERSARY OF THEIR ARRIVAL IN IRELAND
As the Dominicans in Ireland mark the eight hundredth anniversary, both of their arrival among us, and of the birth of Saint Thomas Aquinas, I write to reflect on the Dominican contribution to the life of the Church in Dublin, and, most of all, to express my appreciation for the constancy, courage, and vitality of the Order’s witness to the faith in Ireland.
John Troy OP, Archbishop of Dublin from 1786 to 1823
Eight Centuries of Proclamation and Mission
-Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 5, 2024
The Archdiocese of Dublin, Ireland agrees with me. They interpret the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms dishonestly and that this was the religious formation of all the priests, including Fr. John Joseph Kennedy, Archbishop-elect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican
AUGUST 5, 2024
The Archdiocese of Dublin, Ireland agrees with me. They interpret the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms dishonestly and that this was the religious formation of all the priests, including Fr. John Joseph Kennedy, Archbishop-elect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.
The Archdiocese of Dublin, Ireland agrees with me. They interpret the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms dishonestly and that this was the religious formation of all the priests, including Fr. John Joseph Kennedy, Archbishop-elect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.
They also agree that LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, refer to hypothetical cases. They are invisible people in 2024. So LG 8,LG 14,LG 16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II do not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of Pope Pius X.
Presently Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition (Athanasius Creed, EENS etc) since LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are interpreted by the diocese as being physically visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church and so practical exceptions for the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed etc, in 2024.This is irrational and dishonest but it produces a rupture with the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms. They confuse the baptism of desire (LG 14) as being a visible case and then accept EENS with exceptions,the Athanasius Creed with exceptions, the Catechism of Pope Pius X in which 29C (being saved in invincible ignorance ) is an exception for 24C and 29C ( outside the Church there is no salvation).
SUMMARY
1.They interpret LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS etc irrationally, confusing what is invisible as being visible and then producing a non traditional liberal conclusion,which is a fake.
2.They interpret the Nicene ,Apostles and Athanasius Creed with this error.
3.The interpret the dogma EENS of the Council of Florence 1442 with this same error.
4.They interpret all the Catechisms with this error.
So they are irrational and dishonest in general. - Lionel Andrades
https://dublindiocese.ie/appointment-of-monsignor-kennedy-as-archbishop/
____________________________
AUGUST 3, 2024
I affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism interpreted rationally and they do not. I affirm the de fide teachings of the Church and they do not .
I accept the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of Pope Pius X. Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez and the college of cardinals and bishops do not do this.
I accept Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted irrationally, i.e. LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS etc are hypothetical cases. They refer to invisible people in 2024. So they are not objective exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS etc. Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez do not accept Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. They only accept Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally.
I have mentioned this over the years and there is no denial from any one. They agree with. The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vaticaan supposts public heresy and schism.
Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez interpret LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2,GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II irrationally and so there are exceptions for the Athanasius Creed etc.This is unethical.
So I affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism interpreted rationally and they do not.
I affirm the de fide teachings of the Church and they do not .
- Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/08/so-i-affirm-vatican-council-ii-and.html
AUGUST 3, 2024
I have mentioned this over the years and there is no denial from any one. They agree with. The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vaticaan supports public heresy and schism.
I accept the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of Pope Pius X. Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez and the college of cardinals and bishops do not do this.
I accept Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally, i.e. LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS etc are hypothetical cases. They refer to invisible people in 2024. So they are not objective exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS etc. Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez do not accept Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. They only accept Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally.
I have mentioned this over the years and there is no denial from any one. They agree with. The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vaticaan supports public heresy and schism.
-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/08/i-have-mentioned-this-over-years-and.html
AUGUST 4, 2024
Archbishop Dermot Farrell has not asked Archbishop-elect Kennedy to interpret the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms honestly. He himself does not do so.
Archbishop Dermot Farrell, the archbishop of Dublin has congratulated Archbishop-elect John Joseph Kennedy on his appointment as Archbishop for the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican and has not asked him to interpret the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms rationally, since he himself does not do this and does not expert this of his priests.
Canonically how can the bishops, rectors, superiors and other juridical persons in Dublin carry on like this?
The archbishop of Dublin's understanding of Church; salvation, Hell, mortal sin, inter- faith marriage, divorce, traditional mission etc is in a rupture with St. Patrick, St. Isidore and the Irish missionaries over the centuries.
Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke, Archbishop Carlo Vigano, Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Roberto dei Mattei do not object to all this since they too interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and dishonestly like Archbishop Farrell.
OBJECTIONS FOR CARD. BURKE'S MASS
There should be canonical objections, for example, against Cardinal Burke and the FSSP priests, offering Holy Mass at the FSSP church, Santissima Trinita dei Pellegrini, Rome.They are interpreting the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms dishonestly.
A.I interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, and GS 22 etc rationally. They are invisible cases for me. B. But Cardinal Burke and Archbishop Farrell interpret LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc irrationally. LG 8, 16 etc are physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church. So they both reject the Athanasius Creed, with no exceptions. They support a new Athanasius Creed, which has exceptions in 2024.In this way they do not affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) but produce a new EENS which has exceptions. There are visible and not invisible cases of the baptism of desire, for them, which are exceptions for EENS. This was the mistake in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston.
So why is Cardinal Burke permitted to offer Holy Mass in Rome with the FSSP priests and why is Archbishop Farrell allowed to offer Holy Mass in Dublin ? Rejecting the Creeds or changing its interpretation is first class heresy. This is schism with the pre -1949 Magisterium.
They both are in a rupture with the pre-1949 popes on the Athanasius Creed, extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence 1442 etc, the Catechism of Pope Pius X( 24Q, 27Q - with exceptions), the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church, with known exceptions)etc, etc.
Cardinal Burke does not want to correct others on this specific issue. But he should, personally and publically, affirm the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church. He must affirm EENS with no exceptions and the Athanasius Creed with no exceptions. He must affirm only Vatican Council II with LG 8, 16 etc not being an exception for Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation. He must publicy announce that the Catechism of the Catholic Church, with CCC 847-848 (saved in invisible ignorance etc) not being an exception for CCC 845-846 (outside the Church there is no salvation).
TRADITIONALISTS DO NOT WANT TRADITION
Roberto dei Mattei does not want to affirm the Athanasius Creed (with no exceptions) and Feeneyite EENS (with no known exceptions in 2024), since he does not want to be labeled Anti Semitic etc. It is the same with Michael Matt, Peter Kwasniewski and Taylor Marshall who do not really want the Church to return to Tradition - it is too expensive for them. With the common error there is personal gain, for them. So they all support mortal sins of faith. In this way John Henry Westin stays at LifeSite News. Peter and Michael Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery, NY, maintain their tax exempt status. Christopher Ferrara and EWTN are part of the same ‘network gone wrong’. Bishop Schneider interprets Vatican Council II like the Synod bishops in Germany. Archbishop Vigano wants to keep the liberalism in the Church? Even the SSPX bishops and priests want a tension-free life. Louis Verrecchio says he has a family to support.- Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 3, 2024
In this heretical and schismatic condition Archbishop-elect John Joseph Kennedy from Dublin, Ireland will have his Episcopal ordination.
I accept the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of Pope Pius X. Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez and the college of cardinals and bishops do not do this.
I accept Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted irrationally, i.e. LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS etc are hypothetical cases. They refer to invisible people in 2024. So they are not objective exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS etc. Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez do not accept Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. They only accept Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally.
I have mentioned this over the years and there is no denial from any one. They agree with. The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vaticaan supposts public heresy and schism.
Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2; GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II irrationally and so there are exceptions for the Athanasius Creed etc. This is unethical.
So I affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism interpreted rationally and they do not.
I affirm the de fide teachings of the Church and they do not.
They are interpreting the baptism of desire (BOD) irrationally. I do not make this mistake. So they have changed the interpretation of the Nicene Creed ( I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sin and they exclude the baptism of water and I am not Feeneyite) and the Apostles Creed ( I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church which today teaches that there is known salvation outside the Church in the present times, visible people saved without faith and baptism while before 1949 the Apostles Creed was understood as saying the Holy Spirit teaches the church that outside the Church there is no salvation, there is no known salvation.
To change the understanding of the Creeds is first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths. This is schism with the pre-1949 popes and Magisterial over the century. They interpreted the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms rationally and so morally.
In this heretical and schismatic condition Archbishop-elect John Joseph Kennedy from Dublin, Ireland will have his Episcopal ordination.- Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 2, 2024
So they made him an archbishop.
Archbishop John Joseph Kennedy, a priest from the liberal diocese of Dublin, Ireland had a difficult job. He may have complained.
1.He had to defend Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.
2.He had to defend the liberalism, heresy and schism produced by Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.
3.He had to accuse Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano of being in schism for not accepting all this ‘thrash’ ; the liberalism which comes with the use of a fake premise and inference to interpret the Council.
4.He had to support Pope Francis who is not in communion with the popes of the past before 1949 because he accepted the objective error in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office which was repeated in 1965 at Vatican Council II and he did not interpret LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, rationally.
5.He had to support the excommunication of Archbishop Vigano who was going back to Tradition and not accepting the new liberal doctrines which come from Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally and not rationally…
So they made him an archbishop.
-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/08/so-they-made-him-archbishop.html
_____________________________________________________
AUGUST 2, 2024
The Vigano trial and excommunication must remind us that the Holy Office/CDF/DDF had excommunicated Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops for not accepting Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally
The Vigano trial and excommunication must remind us that the Holy Office/CDF/DDF had excommunicated Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops for not accepting Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.
The Holy Office excommunicated Fr. Leonard Feeney in Boston for not interpreting the baptism of desire irrationally.
They have now excommunicated Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, for not accepting the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II as does Pope Francis.
The irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Cushingite version of Vatican Council II allows Pope Francis to break communion with the popes over the centuries. They interpreted the baptism of desire rationally and so in a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, with no exceptions.
So the pope is not in communion with the popes before 1949 on the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus etc. This is heresy and schism. Since Vatican Council II, (with LG 8,14,15,16 etc), we now know, are invisible cases in 2024.
Invisible people cannot be visible exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors (ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church), Catechism of Pope Pius X (24 Q, 27Q).Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with this confusion and he wants Archbishop Vigano to do the same.- Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/08/the-vigano-trial-and-excommunication.html
Posts
