Saturday, July 20, 2024
Is the DDF competent to judge ?
The Creeds were Feeneyite before 1949 but today are Cushingite for the
Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF), Vatican. So is the DDF competent
to conduct trials for schism? Vatican Council II interpreted rationally does
not contradict Tradition. It is not a break with Tradition.
First Holy Communion and Confirmation Preparation Classes were Feeneyite before 1949 but today are Cushingite. They were Cushingite for Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict. They are Cushingite today for Pope Francis and Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez.Is the DDF competent to judge ?.
The sun was spinning at Trevignon and a statue was weeping blood and this was not supernatural for the DDF. What is the DDF's definition of 'supernatural' ?
The bishop of Trevignon interprets the Creeds etc irrtationally and then creates a false break with Tradition. He must be a Feeneyite on Magisterial Documents to be able to judge. The Apostles and Church Fathers were Feeneyite i.e invisible people were invisible.This issue is not being touched by the leftist media in Italy which is critical of Gisella Cardia and supports Cushingism i.e invisible cases are visible, so Lumen Gentium 16 refers to a physically case of a non Catholic saved outside the Catholic Church in 1965-2024.
They do not report that the bishop at Trevignon, like Cardinal Fernandez interprets Vatican Council II, politically.
Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano’s schism -trial and excommunication for not accepting the liberalism of the pope, created with Vatican Council II, irrational, is political.
Tradition was and is Feeneyite.
Cardinal Fernandez Prefect of the DDF, and Msgr. Kennedy, Secretary, are Cushingite and do not deny this public.
How can they put traditionalists on trial for not accepting the
liberalism of Vatican Council II, interpreted only irrationally? They must
first accept the Council interpreted rationally and so magisterially and then claim competence to judge on doctrine and theology.
A traditionalist, Sister Maria Philomena micm, is the Director of the
St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom, St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire. She
interprets Vatican Council II and the baptism of desire rationally. She is a
Feeneyite on EENS and Vatican Council II and so would also interpret the
Creeds and Catechisms rationally. She accepts the Athanasius Creed, Feeneyite-only.
She could canonically appeal against the Cushingite bishop of
Manchester, NH, Bishop Peter Libasci who is a Cushingite on the Creeds etc. The
diocese of Manchester is a suffragan of the Archdiocese of Boston. Cardinal
Sean O’Malley, the Archbishop of Boston is a Cushingite. He interprets the Athanasius Creed with Cushingism. So he too is heretical
and schismatic on Church Documents, like Bishop Libasci. Cushingism creates heresy and schism irrespective of who uses it, a liberal or conservative Catholic.
If she does not appeal now and correct the situation and clarify her position as a traditional who goes for the Latin Mass and accepts Vatican Council II, tomorrow Cardinal
Fernandez and Msgr. Kennedy could accuse her religious community, the Slaves of the
Immaculate Heart of Mary, of being schismatic and worthy of excommunication.
- Lionel Andrades
https://www.countdowntothekingdom.com/it/controversy-european-media-assails-gisella-cardia/
Veneration of the Holy Cross at Medugorje - 19/7/2024
Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez have an obligation to only interpret Vatican Council II rationally, to be Magisterial.They cannot try traditionalists for schism, while they both interpret Vatican Council II dishonestly and non magisterially.
Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez have an obligation to only interpret Vatican Council II rationally, to be Magisterial. They cannot choose a false premise (invisible people are visible-Cushingism) to make Vatican Council II a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athanasius Creed and then reject the doctrines and theology of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, before 1949. They cannot try traditionalists for schism, while they both interpret Vatican Council II dishonestly and non magisterially.
- Lionel Andrades
The College of Cardinals in the past was Feeneyite but today they are Cushingite. The CDF/DDF before 1949 was Feeneyite. Today they are Cushingite.
The College of Cardinals in the past was Feeneyite but
today they are Cushingite. The CDF/DDF before 1949 was Feeneyite. Today they
are Cushingite.
The Latin Mass in the past was Feeneyite. Today it is
Cushingite.
The Roman Missal was Feeneyite but the New Missal is
Cushingite.
At First Holy Communion and Confirmation preparation
classes in the past they were Feeneyite but today they are Cushingite.
- Lionel Andrades
How can the DDF claim it represented the traditional CDF at the Vigano trial ? Is it competent ? Before 1949 the CDF and the popes affirmed the Athanasius Creed and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with no known exceptions) but the DDF and Pope Francis reject these two Church Documents, which are not contradicted by Vatican Council II( Feeneyite-rational).
Before 1949 for the CDF/DDF the Creeds, Church Councils and Catechisms and First Commandment of Moses was Feeneyite. Today it is Cushingite.
In other words the Creeds, Councils, Catechisms and First Commandment were interpreted rationally with what was invisible as being invisible only. Today they are interpreted irrationally i.e. what is invisible is confused was being invisible only.
https://x.com/carlomvigano?lang=en
So in the schism trial of Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, how
can the DDF claim it represents the CDF? It really is not competent.
Before 1949 the CDF and the popes affirmed the Athanasius Creed and the
dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with no known exceptions) but the DDF and
Pope Francis reject these two Church Documents, which are not contradicted by
Vatican Council II( Feeneyite-rational).- Lionel Andrades
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
