Cardinal
Raymond Leo Burke could be excommunicated since he does not accept Vatican
Council II (irrational) and ‘the reforms’, so he is not in communion with Pope
Francis.
Pope
Francis also interprets Vatican Council II irrationally like Cardinal Burke but
the former accepts the non traditional conclusion and the latter rejects it.
With
Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally heresy and schism emerges and so
Pope Francis cannot be in communion with the popes before 1949.
Neither
Pope Francis nor Cardinal Burke interpret Vatican Council II rationally, i.e.
with Feeneyism.
Before
1949 the popes interpreted the Creeds, Councils, Catechisms and First
Commandment rationally, i.e. with Feeneyism (invisible cases are
invisible, the baptism of desire refers to an invisible person).But today Pope
Francis and the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF), Vatican,
interpret them irrationally, i.e with Cushingism (invisible people in the
present times are visible, the baptism of desire refers to a visible case of
salvation outside the Catholic Church).
Pope Francis, Cardinal Fernandez and Cardinal Burke, accept the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (CDF/DDF) to the Archbishop of Boston, which is Cushingite.The 1949 LOHO has always been Cushingite and has brought the New Theology, into the Catholic Church.
The
liberalism of the DDF comes with Cushingism.Those who do not accept Church
Documents with Cushingism, could be declared schismatic and then excommunicated
The
DDF is so bold as to project liberalism as orthodoxy and those Catholics who do
not accept it are labeled schismatic and excommunicated.
They
justify this liberalism with Vatican Council II (irrational) which creates
exceptions for the past ecclesiocentrism, the teaching on the Catholic Church
having exclusive salvation.
When
what is invisible is confused as being visible I call it Cushingism, I repeat.
When what is invisible is seen as being invisible only, I call it Feeneyism.LG
8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II can be interpreted with
Feeneyism or Cushingism and of course the conclusion will be different.
Pope
Francis interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism and I choose Feeneyism.
Cardinal Burke also interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism, but rejects
the non traditional conclusion and does not seem to know about Vatican Council
II (rational), the Council interpreted with Feeneyism.
Pope
Francis and Cardinal Fernandez are not going to interpret Vatican Council II
rationally since it would then mean that they affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla
salus (EENS). EENS has no exceptions in the text of Vatican Council II,
interpreted rationally. LG 16 etc are not exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.
It
would also mean that Pope Francis and the DDF accept the Athanasius Creed.
Since LG 16 etc are not practical exceptions for this Creed which says all need
to enter the Church and be Catholic, to avoid eternal damnation.
So
with the rational interpretation of Magisterial Documents, including Vatican
Council II, the pope and the DDF would become Feeneyite. This is politically
incorrect with the Left and the cleric can be suspended or laicized.
So
to avoid being excommunicated Cardinal Burke has to accept Vatican Council II
interpreted irrationally. He also has to accept the accompanying ‘reforms’ and
also future ‘reforms’ in the name of the Council (irrational).
DEFENSE AGAINST LIBERAL DDF
1.To put up a defense against the liberal and schismatic DDF, Cardinal Burke must announce the obvious i.e. LG 8,14,15,16,UR3, NA2,GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical cases.They are invisible people in 2024.
2.He must then ask Pope Francis and the DDF to make the
same announcement. This is the moral thing for all Catholics, they must interpret
Vatican Council II only rationally.
3.It will also indicate if the DDF accepts the dogma EENS and the Athanasius Creed which is no more contradicted by Vatican Council II. It will also be known if they are in heresy and schism or have accepted Catholic orthodoxy.
The
announcement will expose the DDF. They can no more use Vatican Council II,
irrational to reject de fide teachings. The Council no more contradicts the
Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the old Catechisms
on there being exclusive salvation in Jesus’ Mystical Body, the Catholic
Church.
Changing
the interpretation of the Creeds with Cushingism i.e. by choosing an irrational
premise (invisible people are visible in the present times), results in heresy
and schism with the popes over the centuries, before 1949.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
