ISSR Ecclesia Mater, Rome Vicariate theology course irrational and political

 

Father Paolo Scarafoni is the coordinator of a theology course for the laity organized by the Rome Vicariate in which they interpret Vatican Council II, irrationally and politically.

For the ISSR Ecclesia Mater at the Pontifical University John Lateran, the course will be ‘councilor and synodial’. They mean LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church in 1965-2024. So they become objective exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.

This is dishonestly. They need to legally clarify that LG 8,14,15,16 etc, refer to hypothetical cases only. So they never ever were exceptions for the apostolic teaching on salvation.

The baptism of desire never was an exception for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus, since the baptism of desire always refers to an invisible case on earth. There is an objective mistake in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney.- Lionel Andrades

https://www.ecclesiamater.org/CategoryPage.aspx?cat=13

A training program in preparation for the Jubilee 2025 has been launched in India based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and politically.

 

A training program in preparation for the Jubilee 2025 has been launched in India based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and politically.- Lionel Andrades

https://www.vaticannews.va/en/church/news/2024-08/india-bishops-ccbi-jubilee-diocesan-training-program.html

Archbishop-elect Joseph Kennedy does not accept the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (with no exceptions), the Athanasius Creed (with no exceptions) and the Syllabus of Errors (with no known exceptions for an ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church).He also changes the understanding of the Nicene-Constantinople Creed. This is first class heresy. It is also schism with the Magisterium over the centuries.

 

Archbishop-elect Joseph Kennedy does not accept the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (with no exceptions), the Athanasius Creed (with no exceptions) and the Syllabus of Errors (with no known exceptions for an ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church).He also changes the understanding of the Nicene-Constantinople Creed. This is first class heresy. It is also schism with the Magisterium over the centuries. He can no more cite exceptions in Vatican Council II for the past ecclesiocentrism. Hypothetical and invisible cases in 2024 of Lumen Gentium 16 etc are not practical exceptions. An exception must exist in our reality. We cannot see or meet someone saved outside the Church without ‘faith and baptism’ (AG 7).

There has been no denial from Kennedy or the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, in spite of so many reports on social media.

 The trial of Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano was invalid in the sense that there is no doctrinal and theological continuity with the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith before 1949. They interpreted all Magisterial Documents (Creeds, Catechisms etc) with the rational premise (invisible cases are invisible) and the DDF chooses the irrational premise (invisible cases are visible in the present times). So in the past they were traditional and today they are liberal.

Archbishop –elect Kennedy is not saying that he affirms the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus like the missionaries of the 16^th century.

He is not saying that his understanding of the Nicene Creed is, “I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sin, it is one known baptism the baptism of water’. Instead it is “I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins and they exclude the baptism of water and so I am not a Feeneyite”.

No one from the DDF affirms the Catholic faith in public. There is no clarification.

Instead Archbishop Augustine di Noia, former Secretary of the DDF (CDF) wrote a letter to Brother Andre Marie mcim, Prior, Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire in the Diocese of Manchester, NH. He wanted the SBC to interpret invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire (CCC 847-848) as being known exceptions for the dogma EENS and CCC 845-846(Outside the Church No Salvation).

He also did not permit the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary to take an Oath or affirm their Catholic Faith, by reciting the Athanasius Creed, as did Fr. Leonard Feeney in Boston.

So how can the DDF in public heresy and schism conduct a trial for schism?  How can they have held a trial of Archbishop Vigano while interpreting Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents irrationally and so deceptively?

I affirm EENS, the Athanasius Creed, and the Syllabus of Errors with no known exceptions. I personally cannot know of any exceptions. This would be something known only to God.

I affirm Ad Gentes 7 in Vatican Council II with Lumen Gentium not being an exception.

I affirm the Catechism of the Catholic Church 845-846 (outside the Church no salvation) with CCC 847-848 (invincible ignorance etc) not being exceptions.  - Lionel Andrades