The foreign embassies at the Vatican need to seek justice for Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano

 

The foreign embassies at the Vatican need to seek justice for Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano.An appeal could be made to the Russian, Italian, U.S and other embassies at the Vatican, to ask Pope Francis to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so honestly and so do justice for the former Italian nuncio to the USA.

Cardinal Fernandez interpreted Vatican Council II dishonestly during the trial of Archbishop Vigano and then accused the Archbishop of schism and excommunicated him.This is political. The foreign ambassies at the Vatican must call for justice for Archbishop Vigano.

The Vatican Office for Inter-religious dialogue is also misinforming non Catholics on Vatican Council II. Lumen Gentium 16 is not an exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the rest of Catholic Tradition.-Lionel Andrades

SEPTEMBER 15, 2024

It is Cardinal Fernandez who should be excommunicated for rejecting the Athanasius Creed and the dogma EENS, changing the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, re-interpreting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally and creating a false doctrinal rupture with the CDF before 1949.

 

It is important to reiterate that:

1.It is not obligatory for Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano  to accept Pope Francis as the pope when the pope does not affirm Vatican Council II ( AG 7, with Lumen Gentium 16 not being an exception) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845,846,1257 with 847-848 not being an exception).

2.It is not obligatory for Archbishop Vigano to accept Vatican Council II with Lumen Gentium 16 interpreted as visible exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). Lumen Gentium 16 refers to invisible cases in 1965-2024.

3. Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez and the other ecclesiastics at the Dicastry for the Doctrine for the Faith, Vatican, were not eligible to conduct the schism-trial, since they do not affirm the Athanasius Creed, which does not have any exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II. The DCF also does not accept the dogma EENS because of Lumen Gentium 16 being an alleged exception.This is public heresy. They have changed the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, when there is a reference to the baptism of desire.

The DCF does not have a continuity with the pre-1949, Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which affirms the Athanasius Creed and the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.

Cardinal Fernandez is in heresy and schism for not affirming the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms interpreted only rationally. It is the same for Pope Francis and the College of Cardinals.

It is Cardinal Fernandez  who should be excommunicated for rejecting the Athanasius Creed and the dogma EENS, changing the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, re-interpreting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally and creating a false doctrinal rupture with the CDF before 1949. He has been supporting the objective and factual error of the popes from Paul VI to Francis and so there is a new liberal theology in the Church. 

PUBLIC MORTAL SIN

It may be mentioned that for me, Pope Francis is the pope but he is in public mortal sin and so IS not in communion with Jesus and the Catholic Church. He is the pope for me, since there is no other pope. Mortal sins of faith take a person to Hell. He needs to end the scandal and receive absolution in the confessional.

I do not hold the position of Cionici, Barnhardt and other sedevcantists.

I also accept Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church but interpret them rationally unlike Pope Franics.- Lionel Andrades

It is Cardinal Fernandez who should be excommunicated for rejecting the Athanasius Creed and the dogma EENS, changing the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, re-interpreting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally and creating a false doctrinal rupture with the CDF before 1949.

 

It is important to reiterate that:

1.It is not obligatory for Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano  to accept Pope Francis as the pope when the pope does not affirm Vatican Council II ( AG 7, with Lumen Gentium 16 not being an exception) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845,846,1257 with 847-848 not being an exception).

2.It is not obligatory for Archbishop Vigano to accept Vatican Council II with Lumen Gentium 16 interpreted as visible exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). Lumen Gentium 16 refers to invisible cases in 1965-2024.

3. Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez and the other ecclesiastics at the Dicastry for the Doctrine for the Faith, Vatican, were not eligible to conduct the schism-trial, since they do not affirm the Athanasius Creed, which does not have any exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II. The DCF also does not accept the dogma EENS because of Lumen Gentium 16 being an alleged exception.This is public heresy. They have changed the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, when there is a reference to the baptism of desire.

The DCF does not have a continuity with the pre-1949, Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which affirms the Athanasius Creed and the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.

Cardinal Fernandez is in heresy and schism for not affirming the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms interpreted only rationally. It is the same for Pope Francis and the College of Cardinals.

It is Cardinal Fernandez  who should be excommunicated for rejecting the Athanasius Creed and the dogma EENS, changing the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, re-interpreting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally and creating a false doctrinal rupture with the CDF before 1949. He has been supporting the objective and factual error of the popes from Paul VI to Francis and so there is a new liberal theology in the Church. 

PUBLIC MORTAL SIN

It may be mentioned that for me, Pope Francis is the pope but he is in public mortal sin and so IS not in communion with Jesus and the Catholic Church. He is the pope for me, since there is no other pope. Mortal sins of faith take a person to Hell. He needs to end the scandal and receive absolution in the confessional.

I do not hold the position of Cionici, Barnhardt and other sedevcantists.

I also accept Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church but interpret them rationally unlike Pope Franics.- Lionel Andrades

O Lord with Wondrous Mystery

Pope Francis in his latest statement on all religions being paths to God is rejecting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church which state there is exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church.

 

Pope Francis in his latest statement on all religions being paths to God is rejecting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church which state there is exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church. While we know that hypothetical and invisible cases of LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II do not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla sales ( Council of Florence 1442), Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation. All) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( 846-outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation, 845-God the Father wants all people to be united in the Catholic Church. The Church is like the only Ark of Noah that saves in the flood).

Pope Francis is also rejecting the Athanasius Creed which says everyone needs to be Catholic for salvation from Hell. He is also putting aside all the Catechisms. It indicates that there is a Hell and that people are going there.

This is a break with the Apostles, the Church Fathers and the Magisterium of the Middle Ages.

We have to choose between, for example, Pope Pius X or Pope Francis - one of the two are in heresy and schism.  - Lionel Andrades

Bishop Strickland: To deny that Jesus is the only way to God the Father is heresy

---

'The only way to God the Father is through His Son Jesus Christ. To deny this is to deny the Catholic faith, this is called heresy,' wrote Bishop Strickland in response to Pope Francis.

 (LifeSiteNews) — Bishop Joseph Strickland has warned that denying Christ as the “only way to God” is a rejection of Catholicism and “is called heresy.”

Posting a short message on X/Twitter on Friday, Tyler’s emeritus Bishop Joseph Strickland gave what appears to be a public response to Pope Francis’ controversial comments earlier in the day about religious authenticity.

“This is what the Catholic Church teaches regarding the unicity of Jesus Christ,” wrote Strickland, linking to the Vatican’s August 2000 document Dominus Jesus.

“The only way to God the Father is through His Son Jesus Christ,” continued Strickland. “To deny this is to deny the Catholic faith, this is called heresy.”

“Please pray for Pope Francis to clearly state that Jesus Christ is the only Way. To deny this is to deny Him. If we deny Christ, He will deny us, He cannot deny Himself,” wrote Strickland in another social media post.

His comments come by way of a response to remarks made by Pope Francis in Singapore many hours earlier, when addressing an inter-religious group of young people.

The Great Vatican Council II Scam

 

The Great Vatican Council II Scam : Books are still being written with Lumen Gentium 16 interpreted as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the rest of Tradition.

If Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally books may not be able to be published and money would not come in. – Lionel Andrades

JULY 28, 2019

Roberto dei Mattei will not announce that he made a mistake on Vatican Council II all these years

Roberto de Mattei will still not tell Diane Montagne of LifeSitesNews that there are no personally known cases of being saved in invincible ignorance outside the Catholic Church and so he affirms extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) according to the 16th century Magisterium and misionaries. The baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) are not literal exceptions in 2019 to the strict interpretation of EENS. 

Nor does he announce that he and Christopher Ferrara,Fr. Nicholas Gruner and John Vennari and others  made a mistake when they interpreted EENS and Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases being non hypothetical. They were wrongly assumed to be personally known non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church.So now there are exceptions to EENS. Invisible people are exceptions.

He does not announce that he and Christopher Ferrara wrote books on Vatican Council II with this objective mistake. They interpreted the Council with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism; with the irrational premise instead of without it.

Rorate Caeili does not announce that Mattei and Ferrara's concept of Vatican Council II was based on a mistake. So it is false. It was the interpretation of Pope Paul VI .

The same mistake was made by Michael Davies, Atila Sinke Guimares and in recent times by Paolo Pascualucci.

The traditionalists today attend the Latin Mass and proclaim the New Ecclesiology and New Theology in public.It is the same as at Mass in the vernacular. It is a rupture with the Tridentine Mass of the 16th century.In the 16th century, BOD, BOB and I.I referred to hypothetical cases and not explicit exceptions to traditional EENS. At the Latin Mass today BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS. So they refer to known non Catholics saved outside the Church. Otherwise how could they be exceptions? This was the reasoning of the liberal theologians and the traditionalists over the last 50 years.
_______________________________

JULY 17, 2019

Mattei and Ferrara read Vatican Council II superficially and wrote books misleading Catholics ( Graphics) 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/07/mattei-and-ferrara-read-vatican-council.html

MAY 5, 2018

The truth has to be proclaimed by Roberto de Mattei for a rebirth of the Church during his lifetimehttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/05/the-truth-has-to-be-proclaimed-by.html

DECEMBER 14, 2017

No contradiction or correction from Roberto dei Mattei  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/12/no-contradiction-or-correction-from.html 

___________________________________________________________________ 

Professor de Mattei, who directs the magazine Radici Cristiane and the Corrispondenza Romana News Agency, has published countless articles and nearly 20 books. His latest has been recently translated into English – 

The Second Vatican Council – an Unwritten Story. 

Vatican II was a “historical turning point,” he told me. Some Council Fathers saw a more optimistic period in bloom. Others, more conservative, did not.  1

-Lionel Andrades

1

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/professor-roberto-de-mattei-explains-the-crisis-in-the-church-part-1-of-2