Monday, September 2, 2024

Bishop Kevin Rhoades a member of the Committee on Doctrine of the USCCB, like Aaron Seng, interprets the Catechisms irrationally, with 'the red being an exception for the blue'. Unlike the USCCB bishops, for me ‘the red is not an exception for the blue’.

 Bishop Kevin Rhoades a member of the Committee on Doctrine of the USCCB, like Aaron Seng, interprets the Catechisms irrationally, with 'the red being an exception for the blue'. Unlike the USCCB bishops, for me ‘the red is not an exception for the blue’.

Rhoades, the bishop of Forth Wayne-Bend, Texas, also interprets Vatican Council II irrationally, confusing hypothetical ( red) passages in LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being objective exceptions in the present times ( 2024) for the orthodox passages( blue) which support the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.

In the Vigano trial, the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican also interpreted Vatican Council II like Kevin Rhoades and his Curia.

Even the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) like Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, interpreted Vatican Council II like the liberals i.e. the red passages are practical exceptions for the blue orthodox ones. For me 'the red is not an exception for the blue'.

Cardinal Victor Fernandez and Archbishop-elect John Joseph Kennedy should have the integrity to admit that they made a mistake on Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms, during the trial for schism of Archbishop Vigano and his subsequent excommunication.

LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II like CCC 847-848 refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2024. So they are not exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors (ecumenism of return) and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).They also do not contradict Ad Gentes 7 (blue passages9 and CCC 845-846 (blue passages).

The continuing protests before the Nuncio’s office in Paris, against the closure of the Latin Mass (since Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally contradicts the old ecclesiology) must also protest, against the interpretation irrationally and not rationally, of Vatican Council II and the Catechisms, by all the bishops’ conferences. The whole Church must return to Tradition and not only those who reject Vatican Council II, irrational.

In Texas, Catholics are not obliged to interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechisms, irrationally and dishonestly like the bishop. The error needs to be exposed. It was because Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church were interpreted irrationally, the Fisher-More College was found wanting and the ecclesiology of the Latin Mass was considered obsolete.

It is illegal for the bishop to interpret Church Documents (Creeds, Councils, and Catechisms) irrationally and so lie to the people.

Also an injustice was done to Archbishop Vigano by the deceptive Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith. It is only when Church Documents (Vatican Council II etc) are interpreted rationally, that they are Magisterial and have continuity with the centuries-old teachings of the Catholic Church which do not change. Aaron Seng’s Tradivox is interpreted with Cushingism and so there is a rupture with the Magisterium of the Apostles and Church Fathers. He cannot claim that Cushingism is Magisterial.The familiar interpretation of Vatican Council II is now obsolete. - Lionel Andrades


Contact - Lionel Andrades 

Catholic layman in Rome

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com



________________________________________



Committee on Doctrine

Chairman

Most Reverend Daniel E. Flores, Bishop of Brownsville

Members

Most Reverend Michael C. Barber, SJ, Bishop of Oakland

Most Reverend Richard G. Henning, Auxiliary Bishop of Diocese of Rockville Centre

Most Reverend Steven J. Lopes, Bishop of The Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter

Most Reverend James Massa, Auxiliary Bishop of Brooklyn

Most Reverend Robert J. McManus, Bishop of Worcester

Most Reverend Michael F. Olson, Bishop of Fort Worth

Most Reverend Kevin C. Rhoades, Bishop of Fort Wayne-South Bend

Bishop Consultants

Most Reverend William E. Lori, Archbishop of Baltimore

Consultants

John C. Cavadini, Ph.D., University of Notre Dame

Reverend Monsignor Michael Heintz, Ph.D., Mount St. Mary's University

Margaret Harper McCarthy, S.T.D., Pontifical John Paul II Institute, The Catholic University of America

Staff 

Reverend Ronald T. Kunkel, S.Th.D., Executive Director

Siobhan Verbeek, J.C.D., Director, Canonical Affairs

James LeGrys, Ph.D., Theological Advisor

Casey Brusnahan, Administrative Assistant

 https://www.usccb.org/committees/doctrine/who-we-are


At the trial for Archbishop Vigano they interpreted Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms with ' the red not being an exception for the blue'. This is confirmed by everyone. This is a judicial issue. They have calumniated and defamed the Italian Archbishop. An apology from the Vatican is due.

 

At the trial for Archbishop Vigano they interpreted Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms with 'the red not being an exception for the blue'.This is confirmed by everyone.This is a judicial issue. They have calumniated and defamed the Italian Archbishop.An apology from the Vatican is due. - Lionel Andrades