Tuesday, September 3, 2024

All the books on Vatican Council II written by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre are now obsolete. He interpreted the Council irrationally, with the red being an exception for the blue. Also all those articles and statements by Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano on Vatican Council II are now meaningless.

 

All the books on Vatican Council II written by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre are now obsolete. He interpreted the Council irrationally, with the red being an exception for the blue. Also all those articles and statements by Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano on Vatican Council II are now meaningless. We know that Vatican Council II interpreted rationally i.e. 'the red is not an exception for the blue' has a continuity with the pre-1949 Magisterium.  There is continuity with the middle Ages.

Over the last 15 years there has been a new discovery i.e., the red is not an exception for the blue. The passages marked in red are hypothetical and so do not contradict the orthodox and exclusivist passages marked in blue in Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the Catechism of Pope Pius X, Dominus Iesus etc. 

So  the Catholic Family News recent interview/statement of Archbishop Vigano by Matt Gaspers is behind times. The relevant questions were not put to the Italian archbishop.1

He stands excommunicated by Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez and Archbishop-elect John Joseph Kennedy who both interpreted the Council and the Catechism irrationally i.e. the red is an exception for the blue, during the schism trial. 

CFN Contributors:

1

https://catholicfamilynews.com/blog/2024/07/19/exclusive-abp-vigano-clarifies-his-position-following-ddf-ruling-part-i/


_____________________  

SEPTEMBER 3, 2024

The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) bishops, their Superior General, Bishop Athanasius Schneider, Roberto dei Mattei and Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, are still interpreting Vatican Council II with ‘the red being an exception for the blue’. There is no comment from the SSPX priests who offer the Latin Mass in Rome and at Albano, Italy.

 

The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) bishops, their Superior General, Bishop Athanasius Schneider, Roberto dei Mattei and Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, are still interpreting Vatican Council II with ‘the red being an exception for the blue’. There is no comment from the SSPX priests who offer the Latin Mass in Rome and at Albano, Italy.

Archbishop Vigano has praised Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre but both of them, Vigano and Lefebvre, did not interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechisms, with ‘the red not being an exception for the blue’. They both, though, were correct in rejecting Vatican Council II (irrational- the red is an exception for the blue).

If they have any questions they can e-mail me at this contact number:

lionelandrades10@gmail.com

 They can also meet me personally in Rome.

- Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/09/the-society-of-st.html




The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) bishops, their Superior General, Bishop Athanasius Schneider, Roberto dei Mattei and Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, are still interpreting Vatican Council II with ‘the red being an exception for the blue’. There is no comment from the SSPX priests who offer the Latin Mass in Rome and at Albano, Italy.

 

The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) bishops, their Superior General, Bishop Athanasius Schneider, Roberto dei Mattei and Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, are still interpreting Vatican Council II with ‘the red being an exception for the blue’. There is no comment from the SSPX priests who offer the Latin Mass in Rome and at Albano, Italy.

Archbishop Vigano has praised Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre but both of them, Vigano and Lefebvre, did not interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechisms, with ‘the red not being an exception for the blue’. They both, though, were correct in rejecting Vatican Council II (irrational- the red is an exception for the blue).

If they have any questions they can e-mail me at this contact number:

lionelandrades10@gmail.com

 They can also meet me personally in Rome.

- Lionel Andrades

The Doctrinal Committee of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) has been interpreting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church with ‘the red being an exception for the blue’. There is no comment or denial from Bishop Kevin Rhoades

 

The Doctrinal Committee of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) has been interpreting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church with ‘the red being an exception for the blue’. There is no comment or denial from Bishop Kevin Rhoades, a member of the Committee and bishop of Fort Wayne-Bend, Texas, where Aaron Seng of Tradivox worked in the Youth Section. Rhoades was also the former Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee.

He does not inform the media that in future he will interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechisms, with the hypothetical (red) passages not being practical exceptions for the orthodox (blue) passages. So ‘the red passages’ in Ad Gentes 7 do not contradict ‘the blue passages’ which say all need faith and baptism for salvation. All.

Also ‘the red passages ‘referring to invisible cases in 2024, do not contradict the Athanasius Creed and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So Vatican Council II (AG 7) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845-846) are Feeneyite. Since LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are no more exceptions. Ad Gentes 7 is the norm for salvation and there are no known exceptions for us human beings in 2024.- Lionel Andrades


SEPTEMBER 2, 2024

Bishop Kevin Rhoades a member of the Committee on Doctrine of the USCCB, like Aaron Seng, interprets the Catechisms irrationally, with 'the red being an exception for the blue'. Unlike the USCCB bishops, for me ‘the red is not an exception for the blue’.

 Bishop Kevin Rhoades a member of the Committee on Doctrine of the USCCB, like Aaron Seng, interprets the Catechisms irrationally, with 'the red being an exception for the blue'. Unlike the USCCB bishops, for me ‘the red is not an exception for the blue’.

Rhoades, the bishop of Forth Wayne-Bend, Texas, also interprets Vatican Council II irrationally, confusing hypothetical ( red) passages in LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being objective exceptions in the present times ( 2024) for the orthodox passages( blue) which support the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.

In the Vigano trial, the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican also interpreted Vatican Council II like Kevin Rhoades and his Curia.

Even the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) like Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, interpreted Vatican Council II like the liberals i.e. the red passages are practical exceptions for the blue orthodox ones. For me 'the red is not an exception for the blue'.

Cardinal Victor Fernandez and Archbishop-elect John Joseph Kennedy should have the integrity to admit that they made a mistake on Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms, during the trial for schism of Archbishop Vigano and his subsequent excommunication.

LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II like CCC 847-848 refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2024. So they are not exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors (ecumenism of return) and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).They also do not contradict Ad Gentes 7 (blue passages9 and CCC 845-846 (blue passages).

The continuing protests before the Nuncio’s office in Paris, against the closure of the Latin Mass (since Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally contradicts the old ecclesiology) must also protest, against the interpretation irrationally and not rationally, of Vatican Council II and the Catechisms, by all the bishops’ conferences. The whole Church must return to Tradition and not only those who reject Vatican Council II, irrational.

In Texas, Catholics are not obliged to interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechisms, irrationally and dishonestly like the bishop. The error needs to be exposed. It was because Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church were interpreted irrationally, the Fisher-More College was found wanting and the ecclesiology of the Latin Mass was considered obsolete.

It is illegal for the bishop to interpret Church Documents (Creeds, Councils, and Catechisms) irrationally and so lie to the people.

Also an injustice was done to Archbishop Vigano by the deceptive Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith. It is only when Church Documents (Vatican Council II etc) are interpreted rationally, that they are Magisterial and have continuity with the centuries-old teachings of the Catholic Church which do not change. Aaron Seng’s Tradivox is interpreted with Cushingism and so there is a rupture with the Magisterium of the Apostles and Church Fathers. He cannot claim that Cushingism is Magisterial.The familiar interpretation of Vatican Council II is now obsolete. - Lionel Andrades


Contact - Lionel Andrades 

Catholic layman in Rome

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com



________________________________________



COMMITTEE ON DOCTRINE

Chairman

Most Reverend Daniel E. Flores, Bishop of Brownsville

Members

Most Reverend Michael C. Barber, SJ, Bishop of Oakland

Most Reverend Richard G. Henning, Auxiliary Bishop of Diocese of Rockville Centre

Most Reverend Steven J. Lopes, Bishop of The Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter

Most Reverend James Massa, Auxiliary Bishop of Brooklyn

Most Reverend Robert J. McManus, Bishop of Worcester

Most Reverend Michael F. Olson, Bishop of Fort Worth

Most Reverend Kevin C. Rhoades, Bishop of Fort Wayne-South Bend

Bishop Consultants

Most Reverend William E. Lori, Archbishop of Baltimore

Consultants

John C. Cavadini, Ph.D., University of Notre Dame

Reverend Monsignor Michael Heintz, Ph.D., Mount St. Mary's University

Margaret Harper McCarthy, S.T.D., Pontifical John Paul II Institute, The Catholic University of America

Staff 

Reverend Ronald T. Kunkel, S.Th.D., Executive Director

Siobhan Verbeek, J.C.D., Director, Canonical Affairs

James LeGrys, Ph.D., Theological Advisor

Casey Brusnahan, Administrative Assistant

 https://www.usccb.org/committees/doctrine/who-we-are

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/09/bishop-kevin-rhoades-member-of.html

___________________________________________

AUGUST 31, 2024

Bishop Kevin C.Rhoades, the bishop of Fort Wayne Bend, Texas, USA and Aaron Seng, founder of Tradivox, interpret the Catechisms with ‘the red being an exception for the blue’ while for me ‘the red is not an exception for the blue’. They interpret the Catechisms irrationally. I choose to be rational and traditional. They choose irrational Cushingism. I choose rational Feeneyism.

 




Bishop Kevin C.Rhoades, the bishop of Fort Wayne Bend, Texas, USA and Aaron Seng, founder of Tradivox, interpret the Catechisms with ‘the red being an exception for the blue’ while for me ‘the red is not an exception for the blue’. They interpret the Catechisms irrationally. I choose to be rational and traditional. They choose irrational Cushingism. I choose rational Feeneyism.With a false premise and inference they produce a non traditional conclusion. With a rational premise and inference I go back to the old theology and traditional ecclesiology- Lionel Andrades



Aaron Seng is the president of Tradivox and general editor of the Catholic Catechism Index, a twenty-volume collection of traditional Catholic catechisms published by Sophia Institute Press.


I am in harmony with the Magisterium of the Apostles, Church Fathers and those of the Middle Ages. They do not have continuity with the Magisterium over the centuries before 1949.

AUGUST 30, 2024

The Catechism of the Catholic Church is Feeneyite . It must not be interpreted with irrational Cushingism for political reasons

 


 


III. THE CHURCH IS CATHOLIC 

The Church and non-Christians 

841

 

The Church's relationship with the Muslims. "The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind's judge on the last day."330 (Lionel : Hypothetically a Muslim can be saved. In reality we cannot know of any such case. So CCC 841 does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and neither CCC 845-846 ( Outside the Church there is no salvation)

330.

 LG 16; cf. NA 3.

360

842

 The Church's bond with non-Christian religions is in the first place the common origin and end of the human race:All nations form but one community. This is so because all stem from the one stock which God created to people the entire earth, and also because all share a common destiny, namely God. His providence, evident goodness, and saving designs extend to all against the day when the elect are gathered together in the holy city...331(Lionel: Yes salvation is open to all in general but to receive this salvation all need to enter the Catholic Church ( CCC 845-846, Dominus Iesus 20 , Ad Gentes 7 etc). 

331.

 NA 1.

28
856

843

 The Catholic Church recognizes in other religions that search, among shadows and images, for the God who is unknown yet near since he gives life and breath and all things and wants all men to be saved. Thus, the Church considers all goodness and truth found in these religions as "a preparation for the Gospel and given by him who enlightens all men that they may at length have life."332 ( Lionel: Yes. For salvation they must accept Jesus in the Catholic Church.( Ad Gentes 7, CCC 845-846 etc). Outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation.

332.

 LG 16; cf. NA 2; EN 53.

844

 In their religious behavior, however, men also display the limits and errors that disfigure the image of God in them:Very often, deceived by the Evil One, men have become vain in their reasonings, and have exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and served the creature rather than the Creator. Or else, living and dying in this world without God, they are exposed to ultimate despair.333

333.

 LG 16; cf. Rom 1:21, 25.

1219
30
953

845

 To reunite all his children, scattered and led astray by sin, the Father willed to call the whole of humanity together into his Son's Church. The Church is the place where humanity must rediscover its unity and salvation. The Church is "the world reconciled." She is that bark which "in the full sail of the Lord's cross, by the breath of the Holy Spirit, navigates safely in this world." According to another image dear to the Church Fathers, she is prefigured by Noah's ark, which alone saves from the flood.334 (Lionel: CCC 845 is saying outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation)

334.

 St. Augustine, Serm. 96,7,9:PL 38,588; St. Ambrose, De virg. 18 118:PL 16,297B; cf. already 1 Pet 3:20-21.

"Outside the Church there is no salvation" 

1257
161

846

 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers?335 Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.336 (Lionel: faith and baptism are necessary for salvation, membership in the Catholic Church with faith and baptism are necessary for salvation. In Heaven there are only Catholics. They are there with faith and baptism and without mortal sin on their soul. Outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation ( Council of Florence 1442 etc)

335.

 Cf. Cyprian, Ep. 73.21:PL 3,1169; De unit.:PL 4,509-536.

336.

 LG 14; cf. Mk 16:16Jn 3:5.

847

 This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church:Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience — those too may achieve eternal salvation.337 (Lionel : Those who do not know Christ and His Church and yet are saved are hypothetical cases. They are invisible people in 2024. So they are not practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Fourth Lateran Council  etc or CCC 845-846 or Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation).

337.

 LG 16; cf. DS 3866-3872.

1260

848

 "Although in ways known to himself God can lead those who, through no fault of their own, are ignorant of the Gospel, to that faith without which it is impossible to please him, the Church still has the obligation and also the sacred right to evangelize all men."338(Lionel: Those who are saved in invincibile ignorance are once again, hypothetical cases only. We cannot meet or see someone saved in ignorance. This can only be known to God. So being saved in ignorance is not an objective exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or CCC 845-846).The Catechism of the Catholic Church supports Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The Catechism is in harmony with the Catechisms of Trent, Baltimore, Pius X etc

338.

 AG 7; cf. Heb 11:61 Cor 9:16.

 AUGUST 30, 2024

For Aaron Seng and Tradivox, the passages in red contradict the passages in blue. But for me they do not. For me the passages in red are hypothetical cases. They are invisible people in 2024.

 "Outside the Church there is no salvation" 

846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers? Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body: 

Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.

 847 This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church: 

Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation.

848 "Although in ways known to himself God can lead those who, through no fault of their own, are ignorant of the Gospel, to that faith without which it is impossible to please him, the Church still has the obligation and also the sacred right to evangelize all men."

-Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848 



For Aaron Seng and Tradivox, the passages in red contradict the passages in blue. But for me they do not. For me the passages in red are hypothetical cases. They are invisible people in 2024.

But for Aaron and the traditionalists and liberals in general, the passages in red are non hypothetical cases. They would have to objective and known non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church for them to be exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the orthodox passages in blue. An invisible person cannot be an exception. Someone has to be there in our reality, he has to be present to be an exception.  - Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/08/for-aaron-seng-and-tradivox-passages-in.html



______________________________________ 

 AUGUST 30, 2024

Catechism of the Pope Pius X : the red is not an exception for the blue

  


23 Q. In what does the Body of the Church consist?

A. The Body of the Church consists in her external and visible aspect, that is, in the association of her members, in her worship, in her teaching-power and in her external rule and government.

24 Q. To be saved, is it enough to be any sort of member of the Catholic Church?

A. No, to be saved it is not enough to be any sort of member of the Catholic Church; it is necessary to be a living member.

25 Q. Who are the living members of the Church?

A. The living members of the Church are the just, and the just alone, that is, those who are actually in the grace of God.

 27 Q. Can one be saved outside the Catholic, Apostolic and Roman Church?

A. No, no one can be saved outside the Catholic, Apostolic Roman Church, just as no one could be saved from the flood outside the Ark of Noah, which was a figure of the Church.

 

29 Q. But if a man through no fault of his own is outside the Church, can he be saved?

A. If he is outside the Church through no fault of his, that is, if he is in good faith, and if he has received Baptism, or at least has the implicit desire of Baptism; and if, moreover, he sincerely seeks the truth and does God's will as best he can such a man is indeed separated from the body of the Church, but is united to the soul of the Church and consequently is on the way of salvation

 

11 Q. Who are they who are outside the true Church?

A. Outside the true Church are: Infidels, Jews, heretics, apostates, schismatics, and the excommunicated.

 

12 Q. Who are infidels?

A. Infidels are those who have not been baptised and do not believe in Jesus Christ, because they either believe in and worship false gods as idolaters do, or though admitting one true God, they do not believe in the Messiah, neither as already come in the Person of Jesus Christ, nor as to come; for instance, Mohammedans and the like.

 

13 Q. Who are the Jews?

A. The Jews are those who profess the Law of Moses; have not received baptism; and do not believe in Jesus Christ.

 

14 Q. Who are heretics?

A. Heretics are those of the baptised who obstinately refuse to believe some truth revealed by God and taught as an article of faith by the Catholic Church; for example, the Arians, the Nestorians and the various sects of Protestants.

 Necessity of Baptism and Obligations of the Baptised

16 Q. Is Baptism necessary to salvation?

A. Baptism is absolutely necessary to salvation, for our Lord has expressly said: "Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God."

 

17 Q. Can the absence of Baptism be supplied in any other way?

A. The absence of Baptism can be supplied by martyrdom, which is called Baptism of Blood, or by an act of perfect love of God, or of contrition, along with the desire, at least implicit, of Baptism, and this is called Baptism of Desire.

 

18 Q. To what is the person baptised bound?

A. The person baptised is bound to always profess the faith and observe the Law of Jesus Christ and of His Church.

  

https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/catechism-of-st-pius-x-1286



In the Catechism of Pope St. Pius X the passages in red are hypothetical  and so are not practical exceptions for the passages in blue which are orthodox and support the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Ad Gentes 7 in Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church 845-846.

Aaron Seng at Tradivox and Peter Kwasniewski at Whispers of Restoration would be wrongly interpreting the red as being an exception for the blue. So the conclusion is non traditional, irrational and heretical and schismatic.

- Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/08/23-q.html



___________________________________   

AUGUST 4, 2022

The hypothetical passages in Red do not contradict the orthodox pasages in blue which support Feeneyite EENS : the Red is not an exception to the Blue