Wednesday, September 4, 2024

Matt Gaspers editor Catholic Family News and traditionalists interpret the Catechism of Pope Pius X irrationally. They interpret this traditional catechism with 'the red being an exception for the blue'. I avoid this error.

 

Matt Gaspers editor Catholic Family News  and traditionalists interpret the Catechism of Pope Pius X irrationally. They interpret this traditional catechism with 'the red being an exception for the blue'. I avoid this error.


Catechism of the Pope Pius X : the red is not an exception for the blue

 


23 Q. In what does the Body of the Church consist?
A. The Body of the Church consists in her external and visible aspect, that is, in the association of her members, in her worship, in her teaching-power and in her external rule and government.

24 Q. To be saved, is it enough to be any sort of member of the Catholic Church?
A. No, to be saved it is not enough to be any sort of member of the Catholic Church; it is necessary to be a living member.

25 Q. Who are the living members of the Church?
A. The living members of the Church are the just, and the just alone, that is, those who are actually in the grace of God.

 27 Q. Can one be saved outside the Catholic, Apostolic and Roman Church?

A. No, no one can be saved outside the Catholic, Apostolic Roman Church, just as no one could be saved from the flood outside the Ark of Noah, which was a figure of the Church.

 

29 Q. But if a man through no fault of his own is outside the Church, can he be saved?
A. If he is outside the Church through no fault of his, that is, if he is in good faith, and if he has received Baptism, or at least has the implicit desire of Baptism; and if, moreover, he sincerely seeks the truth and does God's will as best he can such a man is indeed separated from the body of the Church, but is united to the soul of the Church and consequently is on the way of salvation

 

11 Q. Who are they who are outside the true Church?
A. Outside the true Church are: Infidels, Jews, heretics, apostates, schismatics, and the excommunicated.

12 Q. Who are infidels?
A. Infidels are those who have not been baptised and do not believe in Jesus Christ, because they either believe in and worship false gods as idolaters do, or though admitting one true God, they do not believe in the Messiah, neither as already come in the Person of Jesus Christ, nor as to come; for instance, Mohammedans and the like.

13 Q. Who are the Jews?
A. The Jews are those who profess the Law of Moses; have not received baptism; and do not believe in Jesus Christ.

14 Q. Who are heretics?
A. Heretics are those of the baptised who obstinately refuse to believe some truth revealed by God and taught as an article of faith by the Catholic Church; for example, the Arians, the Nestorians and the various sects of Protestants.

 Necessity of Baptism and Obligations of the Baptised

16 Q. Is Baptism necessary to salvation?
A. Baptism is absolutely necessary to salvation, for our Lord has expressly said: "Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God."

17 Q. Can the absence of Baptism be supplied in any other way?
A. The absence of Baptism can be supplied by martyrdom, which is called Baptism of Blood, or by an act of perfect love of God, or of contrition, along with the desire, at least implicit, of Baptism, and this is called Baptism of Desire.

18 Q. To what is the person baptised bound?
A. The person baptised is bound to always profess the faith and observe the Law of Jesus Christ and of His Church.




For them the hypothetical (red) passages being exceptions for the orthodox (blue) passages which support Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This is dishonesty among the traditionalists. They go for the Latin Mass and use a fake premise (invisible people are visible in 2024) to avoid being labeled Feeneyite on EENS. The Lefebvrists in general are Cushingites.

 


The Lefebvrists also interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally, like the USCCB Doctrinal Committee and the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. They make the same mistake with Vatican Council II  too.




 

Matt Gaspers would also be interpreting the Nicene, Apostles and the Athanasius Creed irrationally. He goes along with the objective error in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston. It was repeated by Pope Paul VI (1965). The same mistake was made by Archbishop Lefebvre and Coetus International. 

The ecclesiology of the Roman Missal is Feeneyite by correspondents of the CFN would interpret it with Cushingism.


-Lionel Andrades

 

 



SEPTEMBER 3, 2024

All the books on Vatican Council II written by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre are now obsolete. He interpreted the Council irrationally, with the red being an exception for the blue. Also all those articles and statements by Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano on Vatican Council II are now meaningless.

 

All the books on Vatican Council II written by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre are now obsolete. He interpreted the Council irrationally, with the red being an exception for the blue. Also all those articles and statements by Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano on Vatican Council II are now meaningless. We know that Vatican Council II interpreted rationally i.e. 'the red is not an exception for the blue' has a continuity with the pre-1949 Magisterium.  There is continuity with the middle Ages.

Over the last 15 years there has been a new discovery i.e., the red is not an exception for the blue. The passages marked in red are hypothetical and so do not contradict the orthodox and exclusivist passages marked in blue in Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the Catechism of Pope Pius X, Dominus Iesus etc. 

So  the Catholic Family News recent interview/statement of Archbishop Vigano by Matt Gaspers is behind times. The relevant questions were not put to the Italian archbishop.1

He stands excommunicated by Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez and Archbishop-elect John Joseph Kennedy who both interpreted the Council and the Catechism irrationally i.e. the red is an exception for the blue, during the schism trial. 

CFN Contributors:

1

https://catholicfamilynews.com/blog/2024/07/19/exclusive-abp-vigano-clarifies-his-position-following-ddf-ruling-part-i/


_____________________  

SEPTEMBER 3, 2024

The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) bishops, their Superior General, Bishop Athanasius Schneider, Roberto dei Mattei and Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, are still interpreting Vatican Council II with ‘the red being an exception for the blue’. There is no comment from the SSPX priests who offer the Latin Mass in Rome and at Albano, Italy.

 

The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) bishops, their Superior General, Bishop Athanasius Schneider, Roberto dei Mattei and Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, are still interpreting Vatican Council II with ‘the red being an exception for the blue’. There is no comment from the SSPX priests who offer the Latin Mass in Rome and at Albano, Italy.

Archbishop Vigano has praised Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre but both of them, Vigano and Lefebvre, did not interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechisms, with ‘the red not being an exception for the blue’. They both, though, were correct in rejecting Vatican Council II (irrational- the red is an exception for the blue).

If they have any questions they can e-mail me at this contact number:

lionelandrades10@gmail.com

 They can also meet me personally in Rome.

- Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/09/the-society-of-st.html

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/09/all-books-on-vatican-council-ii-written.html

The Lord Hears the Cry of the Poor | Psalm 34 (Hymn by John B Foley)