Cardinal Fernandez and Msgr. Kennedy at the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, are enforcing the New Theology of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston (LOHO) and Vatican Council II ( irrational- LG 16 is visible in 2024).Those who do not accept this liberalism are labeled schismatic and excommunicated.

 

Cardinal Fernandez and Msgr. Kennedy at the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, are enforcing the New Theology of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston (LOHO) and Vatican Council II ( irrational- LG 16 is visible in 2024).Those who do not accept this liberalism are labeled schismatic and excommunicated.

 Over the centuries schism referred to innovation in faith and morals and a rupture with the  centuries old Magisterium. Now schism refers to not accepting the liberalism in theology and doctrine, of  Pope Francis. So not accepting the liberalism which comes from the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, is not being in communion with him and the hierarchical Church. The hierarchical Church though over the centuries was orthodox but now it is liberal, non-traditional, heretical, and schismatic..

So those who are accused of schism by the DDF must note this well. The DDF follows the New Theology of the 1949 LOHO and Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. So Tradition is made obsolete. There are alleged practical exceptions for the past ecclesiocentrism.

So it is obligatory for the DDF that all Catholics interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally.

Over the last 15 years we have discovered how Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally.It is the same for all the Catechisms, Creeds and Councils.They can be interpreted rationally and this is not known to people.

At the Placquet Deo Press Conference when Cardinal Ladaria as Prefect of the CDF was asked if the Church still taught it is has superiority in salvation. He projected Lumen Gentium 8 (subsist it) as an exception. In other words it was a practical exception, a visible example of salvation outside the Church.

-Lionel Andrades

MARCH 4, 2019

SSPX does not affirm traditional Catholic theology on other religions and Christian communities

The Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) on their website(USA/ General House) has three reports on the Document signed by Pope Francis with their comments on Fraternity but with no comment saying that Islamism like other religions is not a path to salvation according to Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Dominus Iesus and pre-Vatican Council II Church-documents.
 

The  SSPX has also not responded to reports on this blog which state that because of their Cushingite theology, they really support an ecumenical Christ and a Christian Theology of Religious Pluralism.
 

There has been no denial since the SSPX do not want to affirm the traditional Feeneyite theology. This can be seen in their silence on the Abu Dhabi meeting.
 

Also when Cardinal Ladaria issued Placquet Deo and said that Lumen Gentium 8 was an exception to the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church on it having the superiority and exclusiveness in salvation, there was no SSPX comment.
 

According to Catholic theology, unknown to majority of Catholics, the Muslim suicide bomber like Muslims in general are oriented to Hell, since they die without ' faith and baptism'( AG 7, CCC 846).

-Lionel Andrades

 
 

 







 
 


   



  
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/catholics-can-start-saying-that-fr.html?m=1

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 30, 2019

CDF delegation meet Asian Bishops in Thailand : new doctrines on salvation presented

A delegation of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) met in Thailand from Jan. 15-18 with representatives of the Asian bishops conference(Fabc).It was organized by the Fabc 'office for theological questions'.The Vatican delegation included the cardinal-prefect Luiz Ladaria,Archbishop Joseph Augustine di Noia, the Adjunct Secretary of the CDF, Fr. Herman Geissler,E.S.O  the head of the CDF office for doctrine and other  officials of the CDF.According to L'Osservatore Romano 1   Archbishop Di Noia spoke on the recent letter Placquet Deo 2 and some aspects of 'Christian salvation' and its implications in Asia.

At various sessions of the conference, the bishops of Asia at the Bangkok Pastoral Center,discussed  the functions of the doctrinal commission in the service of the faith with Cardinal Ladaria.Cardinal Tagle and Archbishop Di Noia spoke on the significance of 'Christian salvation' in the midst of new challenges in Asia.There was also a talk on evangelisation in the Asian context.

For me it is clear that the Asian bishops were informed that the Church has rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) after Vatican Council II.Since invisible and hypothetical cases mentioned in Vatican Council II's LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc were interpreted as objective and known non Christians saved outside the Church. This was confirmed at the Placquet Deo Press Conference when Cardinal Ladaria saw LG 8( subsists in / elements of sanctification and truth) as referring to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church. In this way LG 8 becomes an  exception to EENS.
The Asian bishops were told that they all had to continue to accept the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) as being magisterial.Even though LOHO assumed invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOD),  and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are visible exceptions to traditional EENS. So this is the new doctrine approved at the Placquet Deo Press Conference.
About a week before the conference, Archbishop Di Noia  and the Curia in the Diocese of Manchester,USA informed the St. Benedict Center(SBC), in New Hampshire, that when they interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church in harmony  with the strict interpretation of EENS,it  was unacceptable.
Brother Andre Marie MICM,Prior, at the SBC had quoted  the past popes and Church Councils, the Church Fathers, Vatican Council II(AG 7), Catechism of Catholic Church(846) and Dominus Iesus(20) in support of the centuries-old interpretation of EENS, which his community holds.3
He was saying that the blue passages in Magisterial documents are in harmony with the strict interpretatiion of EENS and the past exclusive ecclesiology and the red passages do not contradict the blue passages  but they refer to hypothetical and theoretical possibilities only and not practical and literal exceptions to EENS.4
The Asian bishops are already interpreting the red passages in magisterial documents as being exceptions to the orthodox blue passages, which affirm exclusive salvation, there being only Catholics in Heaven and most people on earth being oriented to Hell, since they lack faith and baptism (AG 7).
The Vatican delegation was creating new doctrines on salvation with an irrational and heretical theology, which is politically correct with the Left-who represent Satan.
-Lionel Andrades

1.
Vie creative per testimoniare il Vangelo in Asia,p.8,
Jan.19,2019.


 2
Placiut Deo (3)
Placuet Deo (2)
Placuet Deo and Bishop Robert Barron (2)
Placuit Deo (38)
 
 3.
 January 13, 2019

False concept of being 'Catholic' legally being forced upon the St. Benedict Center and Catholics in Manchester,USA 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/false-concept-of-being-catholic-legally.html

JANUARY 11, 2019

The CDF wants Catholic religious communities and lay movements to accept heresy and sacrilege otherwise canonical prohibitions will be placed upon them

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-cdf-wants-catholic-religious.html

 

4.

JANUARY 28, 2019

In Magisterial documents the red is not an exception to the blue, the red does not contradict the blue : with the blue there is a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition (16th- century extra ecclesium nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, past exclusivist ecclesiology etc) 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/in-magisterial-documents-red-is-not.html

THURSDAY, MARCH 31, 2022

Hans urs Balthazar did not know that Vatican Council II could be interpreted with a Fake or Rational Premise.

Hans urs Balthazar did not know that Vatican Council II could be interpreted with a Fake or Rational Premise. He did not know that there were two possible interpretations of the Council and the conclusion would be different. It would be either for or against Tradition (Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc).

He chose the irrational interpretation and produced a liberal theology.

The prefects of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the popes did not correct him objective and factual mistake.

-Lionel Andrades

Lumen Gentium 16, 24-hours, throughout the year, always refers to a hypothetical and invisible case. How could it contradict the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius X, the dogma EENS and the Athanasius Creed which Bishop Barron rejected before Shapiro ?

The U.S bishops like Bishop Robert Barron use a False Premise to reject Tradition. They are intellectually dishonest. Unlike the U.S bishops, the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) does not accept Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise.

In this video Bishop Barron says that he did not tell Ben Shapiro that he needed to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation and justifies himself by citing Lumen Gentium 16 ( being saved in invincible ignorance).But Lumen Gentium 16, 24-hours, throughout the year, always refers to a hypothetical and invisible case. How could it contradict the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius X, the dogma EENS and the Athanasius Creed which Bishop Barron rejected before Shapiro ? - Lionel Andrades

 MARCH 30, 2022

Bishop Robert Barron is intellectually dishonest. He openly uses a False Premise to create a rupture with traditional ecclesiocentrism of the Church. This was also done by Cardinal Luiz Ladaria at the Placquet Deo, Press Conference

Bishop Robert Barron is intellectually dishonest. He openly uses a False Premise to create a rupture with traditional ecclesiocentrism of the Church. This was also done by Cardinal Luiz Ladaria at the Placquet Deo, Press Conference, when he was asked by a reporter of the Associated Press,if the Church still teaches that it had a superiority on salvation. This response is not the Gospel teaching (John 3:5, John 16:16).

Bishop Barron is creating division in the Catholic Church with the False Premise and was attacking other Catholics on social media who do not accept his liberalism.

In this new politically correct with the Left video(above), Bishop Barron supports first class heresy ( rupture with the Creeds and Catechisms) when he interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise. This is not magisterial. Since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake. This is human error which is there in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO) and Pope Paul VI’s 1) accepting the LOHO, 2) accepting the LOHO being referenced in Vatican Council II (LG 16) and 3) then concluding that there is known salvation outside the Catholic Church, in the present times. So there are also practical exceptions for extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, Athanasius Creed etc. So then there is a rupture with the Magisterium of the 16^th century which affirmed the strict interpretation of EENS.

The rupture with EENS by Bishop Barron is created by projecting the baptism of desire(LG 14) and invincible ignorance(LG 16), as being objective exceptions for EENS. In other words, what is invisible in 1965-2022 has to be misunderstood as being visible. Then with the false inference Magisterial Documents are rejected.

Bishop Robert Barron is intellectually dishonest, when he does not use a Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and then support the strict interpretation of EENS, as held by St. Thomas Aquinas. In this video he presents Lumen Gentium as an exception for EENS. In other words, there are visible cases of LG which contradict EENS.(See the video-time 10.05 and then 26:25).He then calls this a development of doctrine. First comes with the false premise ( visible cases of Lumen Gentium 16) and then the 'development'.  - Lionel Andrades

______________________________________________

MARCH 29, 2022

Future bishops in the USA could be Scholastic. There is no other choice. Since Vatican Council II interpreted rationally supports the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

 

 The Congregation for Bishops,Vatican recommends the name of bishops for the pope to decide but ultimately it is the pope who will decide. Cardinal Blaise Cupich and Cardinal Joseph Tobin among others, decides who will be a bishop. Politically they are centre-left says John Allen jr, at Crux. They would be moderate and progressive. They will decide who are the future bishops.

But they are still interpreting Vatican Council II with the Irrational and not Rational Premise. There is only one choice. It makes the Council traditional. It supports the past exclusivist ecclesiology.

So all future bishops in the USA could be Scholastic. There is no other choice. Since Vatican Council II interpreted rationally supports the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.  -Lionel Andrades

__________________________________

MARCH 29, 2022

Bishop Barron presents Larry Chapp without mentioning that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with a Rational Premise and the Council will be Traditional supporting the past exclusivist ecclesiology

 

MARCH 28, 2022

The first commandment of God is: I am the Lord thy God; thou shalt not have strange gods before Me.

 

-Lionel Andrades

MARCH 27, 2022

'The Red is not an Exception to the Blue' changes everything in our interpretation of Vatican Council II

 

___________________

MARCH 27, 2022

A video needs to be produced showing the difference in the interpretation of Vatican Council II with the 1) Fake Premise, False Inference and Non Traditional Conclusion and 2) with the Rational Premise, Rational Inference and Traditional Conclusion. The graphics are available on this blog.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/03/a-video-needs-to-be-produced-showing.html

___________________________________________

   

  

____________________________

_____________________

________________________________________________________

MARCH 12, 2022

Is the German Synodal Way legal?

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/03/is-german-synodal-way-legal_12.html

1 Athanasius Creed

2.Nicene Creed

3.Apostles Creed

____________________________________

OCTOBER 1, 2021

With the irrational premise of the Red Right Hand Side Column, the Athanasius Creed is changed : Popes, Cardinals and Bishops use the irrational column

 

                                                                                                                            -Lionel Andrades

 OCTOBER 1, 2021

Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall chose the Blue Left Hand Side Rational Column to interpret the Baptism of Desire (LG 14). The Ecclesia Dei communities can also interpret Vatican Council II rationally ( Graphics )

                                                                                               

 

                                                                               

_________________________________________________

 WE HAVE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF 

VATICAN COUNCIL II : YOURS AND MINE

Lionel Andrades

Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial. Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?

Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

___________________