Cardinals Kasper, Koch, Semeraro, Sean O’Malley and other liberals are in schism – but so are conservative cardinals Burke and Sarah- since Vatican Council II can morally only be interpreted rationally, then the Council is not a break with Tradition. Presently the cardinals reject the past exclusivist ecclesiology, Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athanasius Creed in the name of exceptions created by Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally

 

Cardinals Kasper, Koch, Semeraro, Sean O’Malley and other liberals are in schism – but so are conservative cardinals Burke and Sarah-  since Vatican Council II can morally only be interpreted rationally, then the Council is not a break with Tradition. Presently the cardinals reject the past exclusivist ecclesiology, Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the Athanasius Creed in the name of exceptions created by Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally i.e. by confusing invisible cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14) etc as being visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church in the present times and so objective exceptions for the past teaching on the Church having exclusive salvation.

Five cardinals who do not affirm Vatican Council II rational, the same as the liberal cardinals.

In this way they have rejected de fide teachings in the name of Vatican Council II. They have claimed that since the Council was 'a revolution', doing away with the dogma EENS, it was a precedent to make major changes in the Church in other areas, example, divorce, Holy Communion for the re-married, a new Mass etc.

It is schism when these cardinals reject Traditional Mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church with no known exceptions.For cardinals Sarah and Burke there are exceptions. They are Cushingites and not Feeneyites. 

          Cushingism produces heresy and schism irrespective of who uses it

It is schism when they reject the Athanasius Creed because of alleged exceptions in Vatican Council II.

These cardinals must affirm traditional teachings of the Catholic Church and choose to interpret Vatican Council II only rationally.

- Lionel Andrades

Lionel Andrades

Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.

 Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?

Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

Twitter : @LionelAndrades1