The Vigano trial and excommunication must remind us that the Holy Office/CDF/DDF had excommunicated Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops for not accepting Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally

 

The Vigano trial and excommunication must remind us that the Holy Office/CDF/DDF had excommunicated Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops for not accepting Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.

The Holy Office excommunicated Fr. Leonard Feeney in Boston for not interpreting the baptism of desire irrationally.

They have now excommunicated Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, for not accepting the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II as does Pope Francis. 

The irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Cushingite version of Vatican Council II allows Pope Francis to break communion with the popes over the centuries. They interpreted the baptism of desire rationally and so in a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, with no exceptions. 

So the pope is not in communion with the popes before 1949 on the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus etc. This is heresy and schism. Since Vatican Council II, (with LG 8,14,15,16 etc), we now know, are invisible cases in 2024. 

Invisible people cannot be visible exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors (ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church), Catechism of Pope Pius X (24 Q, 27Q).Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with this confusion and he wants Archbishop Vigano to do the same.- Lionel Andrades