Sunday, September 15, 2024

The foreign embassies at the Vatican need to seek justice for Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano

 


The foreign embassies at the Vatican need to seek justice for Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano.An appeal could be made to the Russian, Italian, U.S and other embassies at the Vatican, to ask Pope Francis to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so honestly and so do justice for the former Italian nuncio to the USA.

Cardinal Fernandez interpreted Vatican Council II dishonestly during the trial of Archbishop Vigano and then accused the Archbishop of schism and excommunicated him.This is political. The foreign ambassies at the Vatican must call for justice for Archbishop Vigano.

The Vatican Office for Inter-religious dialogue is also misinforming non Catholics on Vatican Council II. Lumen Gentium 16 is not an exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the rest of Catholic Tradition.-Lionel Andrades


SEPTEMBER 15, 2024

It is Cardinal Fernandez who should be excommunicated for rejecting the Athanasius Creed and the dogma EENS, changing the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, re-interpreting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally and creating a false doctrinal rupture with the CDF before 1949.

 

It is important to reiterate that:

1.It is not obligatory for Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano  to accept Pope Francis as the pope when the pope does not affirm Vatican Council II ( AG 7, with Lumen Gentium 16 not being an exception) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845,846,1257 with 847-848 not being an exception).


2.It is not obligatory for Archbishop Vigano to accept Vatican Council II with Lumen Gentium 16 interpreted as visible exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). Lumen Gentium 16 refers to invisible cases in 1965-2024.

3. Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez and the other ecclesiastics at the Dicastry for the Doctrine for the Faith, Vatican, were not eligible to conduct the schism-trial, since they do not affirm the Athanasius Creed, which does not have any exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II. The DCF also does not accept the dogma EENS because of Lumen Gentium 16 being an alleged exception.This is public heresy. They have changed the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, when there is a reference to the baptism of desire.

The DCF does not have a continuity with the pre-1949, Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which affirms the Athanasius Creed and the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.

Cardinal Fernandez is in heresy and schism for not affirming the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms interpreted only rationally. It is the same for Pope Francis and the College of Cardinals.

It is Cardinal Fernandez  who should be excommunicated for rejecting the Athanasius Creed and the dogma EENS, changing the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, re-interpreting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally and creating a false doctrinal rupture with the CDF before 1949. He has been supporting the objective and factual error of the popes from Paul VI to Francis and so there is a new liberal theology in the Church. 

PUBLIC MORTAL SIN

It may be mentioned that for me, Pope Francis is the pope but he is in public mortal sin and so IS not in communion with Jesus and the Catholic Church. He is the pope for me, since there is no other pope. Mortal sins of faith take a person to Hell. He needs to end the scandal and receive absolution in the confessional.

I do not hold the position of Cionici, Barnhardt and other sedevcantists.

I also accept Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church but interpret them rationally unlike Pope Franics.- Lionel Andrades

It is Cardinal Fernandez who should be excommunicated for rejecting the Athanasius Creed and the dogma EENS, changing the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, re-interpreting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally and creating a false doctrinal rupture with the CDF before 1949.

 

It is important to reiterate that:

1.It is not obligatory for Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano  to accept Pope Francis as the pope when the pope does not affirm Vatican Council II ( AG 7, with Lumen Gentium 16 not being an exception) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845,846,1257 with 847-848 not being an exception).


2.It is not obligatory for Archbishop Vigano to accept Vatican Council II with Lumen Gentium 16 interpreted as visible exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). Lumen Gentium 16 refers to invisible cases in 1965-2024.

3. Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez and the other ecclesiastics at the Dicastry for the Doctrine for the Faith, Vatican, were not eligible to conduct the schism-trial, since they do not affirm the Athanasius Creed, which does not have any exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II. The DCF also does not accept the dogma EENS because of Lumen Gentium 16 being an alleged exception.This is public heresy. They have changed the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, when there is a reference to the baptism of desire.

The DCF does not have a continuity with the pre-1949, Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which affirms the Athanasius Creed and the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.

Cardinal Fernandez is in heresy and schism for not affirming the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms interpreted only rationally. It is the same for Pope Francis and the College of Cardinals.

It is Cardinal Fernandez  who should be excommunicated for rejecting the Athanasius Creed and the dogma EENS, changing the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, re-interpreting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally and creating a false doctrinal rupture with the CDF before 1949. He has been supporting the objective and factual error of the popes from Paul VI to Francis and so there is a new liberal theology in the Church. 

PUBLIC MORTAL SIN

It may be mentioned that for me, Pope Francis is the pope but he is in public mortal sin and so IS not in communion with Jesus and the Catholic Church. He is the pope for me, since there is no other pope. Mortal sins of faith take a person to Hell. He needs to end the scandal and receive absolution in the confessional.

I do not hold the position of Cionici, Barnhardt and other sedevcantists.

I also accept Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church but interpret them rationally unlike Pope Franics.- Lionel Andrades

O Lord with Wondrous Mystery