The Foundation Exsurge Domini assists consecrated Catholic religious who have been cancelled. These religious now have a new theological and doctrinal model, explained on this blog, Eucharist and Mission, to canonically, inform their bishop that they, the bishops, are in heresy and schism, when they choose to use the irrational and not rational model of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.Here it is. 1
This model is shown in this blog post: A cardinal in public heresy and schism is not authorized to conduct a trial on behalf of the DDF. He does not meet the juridical conditions. The DDF has not denied these specific charges posted on social media over the years
It can be used against the liberal and schismatic Dicastery for the Doctrine
of the Faith (DDF), and the local bishop, who supports political
liberalism and dissent against Jesus and His Mystical Body the Catholic Church, based upon Vatican Council II (irrational).
1. The DDF accepts Vatican Council II, irrational only and not Vatican Council II rational i.e. with LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc being hypothetical, physically invisible cases in 2024.So the DDF, like Pope Francis, is not in communion with the popes over the centuries, before 1949. There is no continuity.
2.The DDF, chooses the irrational premise, Cushingism, to interpret Magisterial Documents and the CDF before 1949 interpreted all Magisterial Documents only with the rational premise i.e. for example, the baptism of desire refers to a hypothetical case only.
3. So the CDF before 1949 was Feeneyite and the DDF today is Cushingite.
4. Cushingism, produces heresy and schism, irrespective of who uses it. So there can be a liberal or traditionalist, Cushingite.The DDF today is not the same, doctrinally and theologically, as the CDF before 1949. There is no continuity.
5.The DDF lacks authority and competence. It cannot interpret Magisterial Documents irrationally and be Magisterial.So it does not represent the pre-1949 CDF. There is also a break with the teachings of the Apostles and the Church Fathers.
6.The canonical conditions required for the trial do not exist.The plaintiffs are Cushingites and so are the judges.
These six points must be considered by canonists and presented to the local bishop and the DDF by cancelled priests.
Fr.
Alessandro M. Minutella, for example, and other cancelled priests, must demand
that Archbishop Corrado Lorefice, the archbishop of Palermo, appointed by Pope
Francis in 2015, must interpret Vatican Council II, only rationally. Once he
does this, he returns to the Tradition of the cancelled priests here.
Legally,
in the secular courts the Archbishop Lorefice, cannot continue to interpret LG
8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being physically invisible cases in
2024. He must admit that they are only hypothetical cases.
The Curia at Palermo, Italy must also interpret Magisterial Documents ( Creeds, Councils, Catechisms etc) with Feeneyism ( invisible people are invisible in 2024) and not Cushingism ( invisible cases are visible in 2024).
Similarly
in the USA, the Coalition for Cancelled Priests/ Alliance for Cancelled Priests
can approach the liberal USCCB by using the L.A interpretation of Vatican
Council II and Magisterial Documents.- Lionel Andrades
1
JULY 25, 2024
A cardinal in public heresy and schism is not authorized to conduct a trial on behalf of the DDF. He does not meet the juridical conditions. The DDF has not denied these specific charges posted on social media over the years
Before any schism trial is initiated the Catholic defendant must inform the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF), Vatican that 1) he accepts Vatican Council II rational and not Vatican Council II, irrational. 2) He accepts and interprets rationally all Magisterial Documents ( Creeds, Councils, Catechisms etc). 3) He is in communion with all the popes over the centuries before 1949, who were Feeneyite and not Cushingite.
The 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney, was Cushingite.
The Athanasius Creed, when it was issued, was Feeneyite i.e there were no exceptions for the de fide teaching on all needing to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation. There were no defacto exceptions, no visible-on-earth exceptions.
The DDF must be informed that it is the understanding of the defendant that the DDF is in heresy and schism since 1) the DDF accepts Vatican Council II, irrational only and not Vatican Council II rational i.e. with LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc being hypothetical, physically invisible cases in 2024.So the DDF, like Pope Francis, is not in communion with the popes over the centuries, before 1949. There is no continuity.The DDF, chooses the irrational premise, Cushingism, to interpret Magisterial Documents and the CDF before 1949 interpreted all Magisterial Documents only with the rational premise i.e. for example, the baptism of desire refers to a hypothetical case only. So the CDF before 1949 was Feeneyite and the DDF today is Cushingite.
Cushingism, produces heresy and schism, irrespective of who uses it. So there can be a liberal or traditionalist, Cushingite.
The DDF today is not the same, doctrinally and theologically, as the CDF before 1949. There is no continuity. The DDF lacks authority and competence. It cannot interpret Magisterial Documents irrationally and be Magisterial.So it does not represent the pre-1949 CDF. There is also a break with the teachings of the Apostles and the Church Fathers.
The canonical conditions required for the trial do not exist.The plaintiffs are Cushingites and so are the judges.
A cardinal in public heresy and schism is not authorized to conduct a trial on behalf of the DDF. The Secretaries and other members of the DDF do not meet the juridical conditions mentioned above.
The DDF has not denied these specific charges posted on social media over the years.-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/07/before-any-schism-trial-is-initiated.html
https://exsurgedomine.it/ https://exsurgedomineusa.org/
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment