The DDF is asking Catholics to accept Vatican Council II with LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc, being visible exceptions for the past ecclesiocentrism and Tradition in general. These are ‘facts’. The DDF contradicts ‘the law’. Canon Law expects all juridical persons, like bishops, rectors etc, to affirm the Athanasius, Nicene and Apostles Creed, understood only rationally and so traditionally. The DDF is not doing this. This is a ‘public fact’.

 

Archbishop Vigano must change his approach over the next 60 days in which he has to appeal. Instead of another ‘broadside’ based upon Tradition, he must talk in terms of Vatican Council II rational and irrational.Vatican Council II, irrational, is the measuring rod being used by the DDF.It makes what he writes on Tradition obsolete.

The DDF is asking Catholics to accept the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (CDF/DDF) to the Archbishop of Boston. It irrationally interpreted invisible cases of the baptism of desire as being visible exceptions for traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Church Councils.

The DDF is asking Catholics to accept Vatican Council II  with LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc, being visible exceptions  for the past ecclesiocentrism and Tradition  in general. These are ‘facts’. The DDF contradicts ‘the law’. Canon Law expects all juridical persons, like bishops, rectors etc, to affirm the Athanasius, Nicene and Apostles Creed, understood only rationally and so traditionally. The DDF is not doing this. This is a ‘public fact’. - Lionel Andrades