There must not be a Cushingite bishop, cardinal and pope.The Missal of Pope Paul VI is heretical and schismatic because of what it does not say; what it omits.Similarly because of what it does not say, Redemptoris Misso and Dominus Iesus are Cushingite.

 

                                                                                        Roman Missal

The Missal of Pope Paul VI is Cushingite. It is based upon Vatican Council II, irrational.  The Roman Missal is Feeneyite. It interprets the baptism of desire etc with Feeneyism.The interpretation is rational. So in the Roman Missal there are no exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the Athanasius Creed.

The Latin Mass is Feeneyite because of the Roman Missal. Traditionalists can be Feeneyite or Cushingite it is important to note. Before 1949 Tradition was Feeneyite. There was no Cushingism, no liberalism. The Novus Ordo Mass is a break with Tradition because of Vatican Council II, Cushingite.

If the Roman Missal was used at the Novus Ordo Mass then the Novus Ordo Mass would also become Feeneyite. It would be as traditional as the Latin Mass with the Roman Missal.

So the basic issue still is Vatican Council II, Cushingite or Feeneyite, irrational or rational. How do you interpret Vatican Council II, with Cushingism or Feeneyism? Do you want the hermeneutic of rupture by using the Cushingite Missal of Pope Paul VI or do you want the hermeneutic of continuity with the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of Pope Pius X with the Roman Missal.

A Catholic cannot be a Cushingite since Cushingism changes the understanding of the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms. It produces heresy when it suggests invisible people are visible exceptions in the present times,  for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. It is heretical and schismatic.

There must not be a Cushingite bishop, cardinal and pope.

The Missal of Pope Paul VI is heretical and schismatic because of what it does not say; what it omits.

Similarly because of what it does not say, Redemptoris Misso and Dominus Iesus are Cushingite. It is because invisible cases are being confused as being visible, they are not Feeneyite, they cannot affirm the past ecclesiocentrism, which was simple and clear before 1949.- Lionel Andrades

JULY 28, 2024

Vatican asks Dominican Order to stay with Cushingism only

 

It specifies that the Mass readings for each day will be those of the current Roman lectionary, and that all the prefaces of the Paul VI Missal will be used for Masses according to the Vetus Ordo.

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2024/07/new-front-in-liturgy-wars-rome-requires.html#more

The Missal of Pope Paul VI is Cushingite while the Roman Missal used with the Latin Mass is Feeneyite.

The New Missal omits the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus which is made obsolete by Vatican Council II, irrational. Vatican Council II, irrational follows the error in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney.

It seems as if Vatican Council II was called to make the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, of the Church Councils, which did not mention any exceptions-obsolete.

The excommunication of Fr. Leonard Feeney was maintained for some 19 years. It was not lifted in 1962-1965. Also Pope Pius XII and Pope John XXIII did not correct the mistake in the 1949 LOHO. It confused invisible cases of the baptism of desire as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

It is from the 1949 LOHO that the New Theology comes from us. The LOHO is Cushingite. Until today no pope has corrected the mistake.It is from LOHO that we get the liberalism in the Church which was approved in a big way at Vatican Council II when the pope interpreted the Council, irrationally and not rationally. -Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/07/vatican-asks-dominican-order-to-stay.html